Week 10: Super Smash Football Melee

Standings
1. Draper (30-9, 1-8 upset)
2. Schweinfurth (29-10, 0-9 upset)
3. Seeberg (27-12, 5-4 upset)
4. Hoying (26-13, 1-8 upset)

Now that we've finally hit November, the back-loaded schedules are starting to pay off. No more stretching for a terrible 4th game to pick: feast your eyes on an 8-pack of barn-burners of such variety that one of us might actually pick a different team to win!

Oklahoma Sooners @ Oklahoma State Cowboys
Draper: Always love some good Bedlam.  After the initial CFP top 25 release sees the Sooners at number 5 (unexpectedly to those that don't pay attention), Boomer Sooner is on top of the world! (Right where Mike Gundy and the Pokes want them).  OU had to have spent most of last week patting themselves on the back being ahead of OSU in the initial rankings, but Mason Rudolph has to be foaming at the mouth to knock that stupid grin off of Mayfield's bro-face.  Between the lines, these teams have different styles but have been winning the same way.  I expect the home crowd and the pounding paddles to make the difference clearing one of the roadblocks out of the Buckeyes' way in a shootout.  OU: 38--OkSt: 45
Hoying: Not counting UCF QB Mckenzie Milton, JT Barrett is now the the #2 most efficient QB in America, sandwiched between Baker Mayfield at #1 and Mason Rudolph at #3. So who's got the advantage here? It's hard to say. These teams are both offensive juggernauts with middling defenses. Each struggled against Texas and one or two other average conference foes. This one could come down to...coaching? Lincoln Rhyme is having a great first-year campaign at the Sooners' helm, but this isn't Mike Gundy's first rodeo. The Cowboys finally break free and continue on the path toward the most pointless championship game in all of sports, the round robin rematch. OU: 38--OkSt: 41
Schweinfurth: I am actually surprised Bedlam is this week. But alas, it is upon us. Oklahoma's defense has been hot garbage since holding Ohio State in check week 2 (I call that prepping all summer). It also appears that defenses have figured out Mike Gundy's high powered Cowboy offense but seemed to right that wrong last week. I am really not sure who to go with on this because both teams have been so good on offense and so, so bad on defense. I'll take the Pokes at home. Maybe Baker Mayfield can figure out how the CFP works after the game. OU: 42--OkSt: 49
Seeberg:  Oklahoma feels somewhat like a yo-yo state in regards to its two preeminent college football programs.  The Cowboys scored just 13 in beating Texas but seemed to right their offense last week, crushing West Virginia.  The Sooners, meanwhile, were practically anointed national champs after dismantling OSU in the 'Shoe before looking downright pedestrian for four weeks straight (loss to ISU, three 1-possession wins over unranked teams).  This definitely feels like a flip-a-coin matchup, but I'm guessing the Sooners pour it all out to win this one, then don't have enough left in the tank against TCU next week, probably because Mayfield will wear his arm out trying to plant another flag.  OU: 42--OkSt: 34  

Penn State Nittany Lions @ Michigan State Spartans
Draper: Some have called this the most beautiful trophy in all of sport...well, one has called it that (Franklin has to have something to talk about).  Both of these teams come off disappointing week 9 losses at 2 different ends of the spectrum.  PSU lost in heartbreaking fashion to the Buckeyes in a pseudo-elimination game (or is it?) and the Spartans went and doinked the season away vs. Northwestern to enhance Pat Fitzgerald's B1G COY resume.  That being said, Penn State is simply the far superior team and will be much angrier.  I don't think the loss to the Buckeyes will lead to a let down by the Lions, but rather a resurgence.  PSU big.  PSU: 38--MSU: 10
Hoying: The battle for the Land Grant Trophy is renewed, at the start of November rather than the end for some reason (see also early November Bedlam above). Michigan State's zombie-like shambling was good enough for the likes of incompetent teams like Michigan and Minnesota but could not withstand the withering triple overtime assault of the Northwestern Wildcats. The Buckeyes have shown that a team with offensive talent can move the ball on what seemed like an impenetrable Penn State front, but Sparty's been scoring about 21 points per game in B1G play, and that's including 14 points scored on the short field in OT last week. If the Nittany Lions come out frothing at the mouth (like their rabid mascot), they have a good shot to notch their third shutout of the season. MSU's stat correction stretch continues. PSU: 27--MSU: 3
Schweinfurth:  I'll be honest, this game shouldn't be close if Penn State is all they are supposed to be. Michigan State has has a lot of trouble running the ball and the Nittany Kitties are pretty ticked off after that JT Barrett throat punch. I don't see Barkley putting up over 100 yards but McSorely should do enough for the win here. PSU: 31--MSU: 10
Seeberg:  Penn State is good and angry.  Michigan State is...okay, though also likely angry after losing in triple OT to Northwestern.  Advantage?  Penn State.  This one might get ugly.  PSU: 38--MSU: 13 

Clemson Tigers @ North Carolina State Wolfpack
Draper: Can the Wolfpack summon the power of the full moon once again to take down the Tigers in Raleigh? NC State has been a really fun team to watch all year with Ryan Finley at the helm and a very talented defensive line. The problem? The Clemson defensive line is simply nasty.  Honestly, Clemson has probably the 2nd or 3rd most dominant roster in the NCAA right now in terms of athletes.  Dabo also knows that the loss to Cuse closed the door on any room for error.  This is a statement game for the Tigers to retake ownership of the ACC and I think they do it in a big way.  Clem: 27 -- NCST: 13
Hoying: Getting blown out by Notre Dame is a disappointment for NC State, but all of their (realistic) goals are still in front of them. Beat Clemson and the Atlantic division is all but assured. The Wolfpack have popped onto the radar after wins over Florida State (bad) and Louisville (also bad) but are in terrible danger of being exposed if everything goes pear-shaped on them for the second week in a row. Clemson hasn't exactly been humming along but their defense has been superb. The most points they've allowed all season is 27 (when they lost their starting QB and only scored 24 themselves). Before the season, this might have looked like a trap game before the Tigers host Florida State next week, but somehow I don't see Clemson being caught looking ahead right now. Clem: 27--NCSU: 16
Schweinfurth: Clemson's only loss came to Syracuse, on the road, on a Thursday night, when their starting QB got hurt. All of those circumstances add up to an upset loss. That's not going to happen here. These are two great defenses, but Clemson has the better athletes. This game should be close all the way. Watch if you like low scoring games. Clem: 17--NCSU: 13
Seeberg:  Clemson still has everything in front of them after seemingly falling off the radar by losing to Syracuse of all teams.  NC State won't catch them off guard this season like last year, where the Wolfpack would have beaten the Tigers if they had possessed even a borderline competent kicker.  Sorry to all my friends in Raleigh.  Clem: 34--NCSU: 17

Stanford Cardinal @ Washington State Cougars
Draper: Stanford looked like a complete shell of themselves vs the might of Oregon State.  Bryce Love didn't suit up for that game which shows me that the Cardinal are a one man team.  Can the evil genius Mike Leach crack the code and hold Bryce Love to fewer than 10 yards per carry?  Look at the Cougars schedule and you'll see that the 2 oops games happened on the road.  I'm gonna roll with my guy in Pullman and expect some evil pirate magic.  Maybe the Cougars will play Stanford football and pull this one out! Stan: 28--WSU: 31
Hoying: One team likes to run. One team likes to throw, and can't stop the run. I think we saw this movie last week, and I think it ended with Arizona QB Khalil Tate running wild and the Cats running up the score on the Cougars. It was fun to imagine Washington State as a contender for...something...for a while, but they're safely fading back into obscurity, and a healthy dose of Bryce Love looking for Heisman campaign redemption should speed them on their journey. Or Love won't play and Stanford will get stomped. Whatever. Stan: 38--WSU: 30
Schweinfurth: Washington State has followed the Mike Leach blueprint to a T this year. Win early games by a lot and draw all the voters in...and then bomb out. Look, Leach is a great offensive mind and his Air Raid system is hard to stop...unless your QB throws 5 picks. Yea, that happened. I don't see Stanford pulling a Cal and embarrassing the Cougs, but turnovers kill here. Stan: 30--WSU: 17
Seeberg:  Let's see what we have here.  Crazy Mike Leach-led club in full freefall mode?  Check.  Leading Heisman candidate, Stanford's Bryce Love, back?  Well, we don't know, as he is a game-time decision.  Stanford struggled mightily with Pac-12 bottom-feeder Oregon State in his absence, but my guess is a team led by Bryce Love at about 85% is still good enough to beat the pretender Cougars.  Stan: 24--WSU: 16

Louisiana State Tigers @ Alabama Crimson Tide
Draper: This reeks of Coach O return to Earth.  LSU reached a new low losing to Troy at home on homecoming, then rebounded nicely to beat Auburn and Florida.  But then we have Bama and Nick Saban.  There is a major talent disparity between these teams (unlike the more level playing field under much of the Miles era.  Bama is going to play a little angry after being demoted (justifiably) to the 2 line in the CFP rankings.  I have a feeling Saban and the Tide will remind the committee (and LSU) where the real power in the SEC resides.  Another day at the office against an overrated LSU squad.  LSU: 10--Bama: 27
Hoying: Back in the late aughts, this game used to have bilateral BCS championship hunt ramifications. Now it just provides an annual illusory opportunity for LSU to score a big win and jump back into relevance, an opportunity they invariably squander. Alabama has won six straight in this series, though only 2 in blowout fashion. LSU's done a nice job of lucking into wins over juggernauts like...Florida...and losing to Sun Belt teams, while Alabama has been blowing out (bad) team after (bad) team. The best team the Tide have faced, Texas A&M, managed to hang within one possession of Alabama, and it's not outside the realm of possibility that a slightly more talented team could spring the upset. Even FSU was only down 10-7 before their season blew out its knee in the third quarter. I just don't think Coach O and friends have their act together quite tightly enough to make it happen. LSU: 14--Bama: 24
Schweinfurth: It looks like everyone has forgotten how bad LSU was at the start of the year. I mean they were talking of firing Coach O after like 4 games. The SEC has two good teams and a lot of overrated teams. Bama falls in the former category. LSU: 10--Bama: 31
Seeberg:  I know, I know, this is a "big" game.  Except I literally trust nobody in the SEC outside of 'Bama and Georgia.  If the Tide lose a game to a team that lost to Troy (and lost nearly a $1 mil game check in the process) the transitive property of college football- and the imperialism map- will look flat-out insane.  No chance that happens.  LSU: 17--Bama: 35

Virginia Tech Hokies @ Miami Hurricanes
Draper: I'm trying to figure out if this game has mattered since there was a Vick under center for VT (Michael or Marcus).  Miami has been leading a charmed life this season but the only team with a modicum of talent they've faced was FSU and they had the game lost until the Noles kindly handed them the win.  I don't know much about VT but they've had a more taxing schedule.  Yeah, Clemson took their toll, but wins over West Virginia and BC (yes, that BC) are better than the Canes have on the resume this year.  Home game for the Canes, but no one cares.  Virginia Tech pulls off a big win in Little Havana.  VT: 20 -- Miami: 17
Hoying: Is it time for the Big East championship already? Will any of our readers get that dated reference? Anyway, this game is meaningful for both teams in the first time in forever. The last time Miami was in a title chase in November they got utterly pantsed by Famous Jameis and co. Can we look forward to a similar exposure here? All signs point to yes, except that Miami keeps finding ways to pull out absurd endings. Teams like this are itching to get tagged, unless they don't. I have a feeling the losses may start coming in bunches, but I'm going to hold off until the Hurricanes' water breaks. VT: 15--Miami: 16
Schweinfurth: Miami is severely inflated this year. TWO last second wins already. Does anyone remember those Mark Richt coached Georgia teams? They were always good and then choked in big games. Virginia Tech is no slouch and I believe this will be relatively low scoring. Bud Foster's D shows up big and makes a play to win it, probably a pick of a lob to the sideline. VT: 21--Miami: 17
Seeberg:  Miami just keeps finding ways to win, which is both a positive and a negative.  Beating UNC- you know, that 1-8 powerhouse- by a whopping 5 points is sad...and Virginia Tech beat them by 52.  I was surprised how low the Hokies were in the initial playoff rankings, but it's clear the committee valued resume over the eye test.  Va Tech hasn't beaten anybody, but that'll change by the end of this weekend.  Hokies big.  VT: 38--Miami: 17

Arizona Wildcats @ USC Trojans
Draper: Rich Rod? Good? I don't know about that, but Khalil Tate is just chewing up opposing defenses like crazy. They just took down the Cougs in impressive fashion, but that puts them on the radar of 'teams to not take for granted'.  The Trojans have been the second most disappointing team this year, but the athletes in LA are a different class than those in Tuscon.  USC may have pooped the bed in their two losses to Notre Dame and Washington State, but the Irish have shown to be more than a mirage, and the Cougs, well they aren't terrible.  USC isn't setting the world on fire, but I think they'll be able to put the Cats in their place.  Another year, another non-Arizona Rose Bowl.  USC: 38 -- Zona: 27
Hoying: Just when it seemed like Rich Rod was going to be fired (again), the Zone-a read has been reperfected behind the steady arm and crazy legs of Heisman dark horse Khalil Tate. Not since the days of Pat White and Steve Slaton (or maybe JT and Zeke) have D-ends across America been so confused. Play to your strengths, I suppose, which means USC is pretty much screwed after going all-in on turnover machine Sam Darnold. As for defense, the last great rushing team the Trojans faced was...Notre Dame??? Gulp. USC: 38--Zona: 45
Schweinfurth: I have no faith in Sam Darnold. Seriously, go back and look at my previous posts. The dude is a turnover machine. Not good when you are on the road against a dominant run team. Khalil Tate has turned the Wildcats around this year (and probably saved Rich Rod's job). I look for Darnold to throw at least 1 pick and maybe even a pick 6. USC goes down again. USC: 38--Zona: 42
Seeberg:  Hmm, a Rich Rod-led squad against the Trojans.  Man this feels like ND vs. UM where I just wish everybody could lose.  The Wildcats' "signature" win was a stomping of Washington State last week while USC manhandled Stanford earlier this year.  I just don't trust Sam Darnold as much as I did at the start of the year, but I trust Zona's D even less.  First to 50 might win, but I'll curb those expectations just slightly.  USC: 49--Zona: 38

THE Ohio State University Buckeyes @ Iowa Hawkeyes
Draper: Iowa wants this game played in the teens but do they have the horses to slow down the Buckeye offense.  JT and Company have seemed to figure some things out vs. the Lions and I expect them to continue to improve.  The road environment in Kinnick isn't a day at the park, but the 3:30 kickoff is a God-send.  Weird things happen in Iowa City after dark (ask PSU this year--almost-- and Michigan last year.  The Buckeye defensive line should hold Akrum Wadley in check.  So long as the offense can crack 20, I feel pretty good (even with the hot mess of the kickoff unit).   How will JT handle the acclaim (he's used to everyone saying he sucks)?  I expect 250 through the air, 100 on the ground from Dobbins, 75 from Barrett, and 50 from Weber with at least 4 sacks from the rushmen.  The Hawkeyes have a decent defense, but the Buckeye offense is simply too much.  Iowa "waves" goodbye to their chance at a huge win and Ferentz inks another 5 year deal after the keeping the game withing 30.  OSU: 38 -- Iowa: 10
Hoying: Well, we've now seen the Buckeyes slice and dice one of the B1G's elite offenses, hanging 39 on Penn State. Unfortunately, they have to do it again. Iowa has given up more than 20 points exactly once in conference play, to Penn State. Granted, the other offenses the Iowa has faced are such firecrackers as Michigan State, Illinois, Minnesota...this week will be a bit of a stiffer challenge. On the other side of the ball, Iowa features a tiny running back and an immobile pocket passer. The D Line is going to feast. Ohio State is hitting its groove, but let's not forget 2014, when JT etc. conquered Michigan State and then underwhelmed a bit for the rest of November. As long as the Buckeyes don't win the coin toss and defer, they should be OK in this one. OSU: 31--Iowa: 10
Schweinfurth: Let's go back to the Penn State game for Iowa. They played an elite defense and looked miserable. They really didn't move the ball much outside of a few desperation drives. And now, here waltzes in one of, if not the best, defensive line in the nation. That big, fast, and on a mission to destroy stationary QBs. Oh hi Nathan Stanley. Please put on this extra padding because you will probably get mauled. Let me air this as well. Everyone wants to complain about the quick screens and outs to the sidelines from the OSU offense. Two of those 4th quarter TDs DON'T happen if OSU doesn't show that early. Go watch the safeties and linebackers bite on those two plays. It's a total set up. Yes, you will see more of those passes, but they will be accompanied by some shots down the middle of the field. Johnnie Dixon will have another feast if all works out. This game isn't at night, which helps, but Iowa is still a tough place to play. This game isn't flashy, but it's a win. OSU: 38--Iowa: 10
Seeberg:  The scheduling gods may have actually done the Buckeyes a solid here, making this a 3:30 game instead of a night contest.  Maybe Urban's complaining helped?  In any event, Ohio State beat three opponents last Saturday (Penn State, Ohio State's kickoff team, and the refs), so just one team should be pretty easy, right?  Not so fast.  Iowa plays some seriously boring, ball control offense, and even the most prepared/well-coached squad imaginable is likely to let down at least somewhat after that massive victory.  I expect the Bucks to start slow- though not in such a disastrous fashion as against the Nits- before asserting themselves from mid-2nd quarter on.  Expect a workman, Wisconsin-like win.  Let the RBs eat please!  OSU: 35--Iowa: 13

Upset Special
Draper: Indiana over Wisconsin
Hoying: South Carolina over Georgia
Schweinfurth: Wake Forest over Notre Dame
Seeberg:  Texas over TCU

Grading the Bucks: Week 8 — Penn State

After some time to digest, it’s time to examine the results of the epic clash from last Saturday.  I think most are now ready to join me on the JT bandwagon.  I’ll welcome you back with open arms as long as you apologize :).

Offense: A-
Welcome home Mr. Barrett.  You are finally getting some recognition that you have richly deserved.  Yes, the offense started slow, but boy did they show up when it counted.  I’m very disappointed with Parris Campbell as he still hasn’t figured out how to be more than an athlete (fantastic speed/athletic skills, but he's not a wide receiver yet), but the rest of the receiving corps was quite good.  The star of the show was under center and he delivered.  He did have a mishandled handoff that seemed to be the death knell (all you naysayers on twitter told me the game was over...), but the leadership and poise he showed even when the chips were down was incredible.  The O-line was a major bright spot as they held up very well against a very good PSU defense.  Running backs have also continued to plug away impressively.  It all centers around the signal caller, and that is why they shined.  Did anyone forget that PSU was the number one scoring defense? No longer!

Defense: A
Ok, wait a minute. A defense gives up 38 points and gets...an A? How does that work? I must be getting soft.  Let’s be honest: the opening kickoff return wasn’t their fault, and the first TD was the result of a fumble and an absolutely PERFECT pass and catch (watch the replay--no defense for that), not to mention another stupid kickoff return to the 21.  Ask Saquon Barkley what he thinks about this defense.  Other than a 36 yard TD run (which was nice) the Bucks held Mr. October Heisman to about 21 inches per carry and he went backwards in the 4th. The defensive line was SPECTACULAR as we’ve touted all year.  Again, with all that went wrong, this unit kept the Buckeyes alive and delivered.  The secondary got a little chewed up by Gisecki, but that was it.  McSorley—Nothing, Barkley—Nothing but 1 run good run.  I’d take that any day. Oh yeah, let’s not forget the Touchception in there and another interception called back on an extremely questionable DPI.  With everything going wrong, the defense kept the hope alive.

Special Teams: DRUNK
Now things get interesting.  I dodged the question up top but I’ll answer it here.  The kickoff unit gets a freaking ZERO.  That was worse than an F.  I said nothing makes me more angry than kicks out of bounds...and now I’m on team ‘kick it out of bounds so I don’t have to see this crap’.  It was a total embarrassment of kicking and coverage that it looked like a 1920s Vaudeville act.  BUT one thing no one wants to mention: the rest of the special teams units were actually excellent.  2 made FG (seems pedestrian, but Nuremberger delivered in when everything else was crumbling), kickoffs routinely returned to the 35+ by OSU, no punts returned (guess how many yards the Bucks have given up this YEAR on punt returns?  ZERO), and how soon we forget the blocked punt.  I was dumpster firing early, but the special teams weren’t that bad! (But yes, the kickoff unit was actually worse than you remember).

Coaching: A-
This was primarily a psychological award.  Keeping a team believing they could win after the first haymaker (kickoff return) and the second one (fumble and quick score) is no small task.  The offensive schemes were weird to say the least early on with the return of the pass to the flat but it did help spread out the defense to make that sweet underbelly of the middle of the field open.  JT is a master of carving up the middle of the field with the short to midrange passing game and it was set up nicely.  There was a bit of desperation going for the 4th down early on, but I think it was really a coin flip.  The coaches gambled and lost (on a superb PSU tackle on KJ Hill).  That's ok.  You need to believe in the call and I know the coaches wouldn't apologize.  It wasn't an easy call, but I don't think there was a wrong decision in that situation.

Overall: A
Epic comeback against a hated team in conference that (oh by the way) was the number 2 team in the nation.  It wasn't perfect, but the grit/resolve this team showed was undeniable.  The talent is there and if they put it all together, look out.  Best defensive line in America, reloaded secondary, amazing running backs, improving wide receivers, very good O-line, and a trigger man with all the intangibles, and yes, the physical and mental ability no matter what the haters say (JT--MY GUY)--this team could be special. Just keep climbing that ladder.

Annual Playoff Freakout

Another fall, another playoff chase for the men of the scarlet and gray. For the 3rd time in 4 years, Ohio State debuted outside the Committee's top 4, at #6. And you know what that means for Buckeye Nation. The sky is falling! The Committee's going to leave us out again!

For those of you keeping score at home, you may remember that the one year in which Ohio State actually started in the top four was the one year in which Ohio State did not make the playoff (2015). In the other two years of the playoff, the Buckeyes premiered at #16 and finished at #4 (2014) and premiered at #6 (hint, hint) and finished at #3 (2016).

But that was then, and this year there's a new rogues' gallery for Ohio State to navigate. How dire are our prospects? Let's dive in.

The Obvious Problem (undefeated teams)

There may be 5 teams currently ranked ahead of the Buckeyes, but only #1 Georgia and #2 Alabama still have unblemished records. Waiting in the wings are #9 Wisconsin and #10 Miami, also unsullied. And the Committee has never left out an undefeated Power 5 team (sorry, #18 UCF), though it's not outside the realm of possibility, judging by the way undefeated 2014 Florida State finished behind two one-loss teams. The good news is that as long as the Buckeyes take care of business, only 2 of these 4 usurpers can finish without a loss. Georgia and Alabama are on a collision course for the SEC Championship, and Wisconsin is just itching for another 59-0 beatdown in Indianapolis at the hands of the Silver Bullets. So, at worst, we're looking at 13-0 Alabama and 13-0 Miami. That leaves at least 2 spots remaining for one-loss teams.

With this in mind, let's assess each team's threat to finish ahead of Ohio State:

#1 Georgia / #2 Alabama
The SEC champion is in, unless they somehow have 2 losses (not likely). What if both teams are 12-0 going into the SEC championship? Would the loser have a shot at making the playoff? Possibly, but it would be hard to justify putting a 12-1 non-champion ahead of a 12-1 Big Ten champion Ohio State with wins over Penn State and Wisconsin. One (but not both) of these teams will take one playoff spot.

#3 Notre Dame / #4 Clemson / #10 Miami / #13 Virginia Tech
Miami is the common link here, scheduled to play Virginia Tech and Notre Dame over the next 2 weeks, and possibly Clemson in the ACC Championship. An undefeated Miami would clearly get in ahead of Ohio State, but that's close to a best-case scenario for the Bucks, as the Canes would have to knock out the other 3 teams to make it happen. More problematic would be Notre Dame winning out and Clemson winning the ACC. It's hard to see Clemson falling past the Buckeyes if they win out and pick up wins over NC State, South Carolina, and the winner of Miami and VT. Fair or unfair, 31-0 is hard to erase from people's minds. As for VT, if they win out they'll score a win over Miami and probably avenge their loss to Clemson in the title game. Would that outdo Ohio State wins over Penn State, Michigan, Michigan State, and Wisconsin? Doubtful, but it might depend on how Wisconsin looks down the stretch.

Notre Dame is the real wild card. They already have a sterling resume, with wins over USC, NC State, and Michigan State, and they can pick up wins over Miami and Stanford as well, but they don't have the opportunity to pick up a conference championship or a 12th win. I still don't see a good opportunity for Ohio State to jump them, although Notre Dame's quality opponents are going to be tested down the stretch, starting with this weekend.

In short, fear Clemson and Notre Dame winning out. Miami winning out would solve more problems that it creates, and Virginia Tech isn't a real threat (probably)

#5 Oklahoma / #8 TCU / #11 Oklahoma State
The good news here is that all these teams play each other due to the round robin nature of the Big 12, and each team has a loss already. Add in the pointless superfluous title game, and there won't be more than one one-loss team leaving this conference alive. Oklahoma is obviously the biggest threat, due to the head-to-head win over Ohio State (the only good non-conference win of any of these three). The survivor of this trio will have some nice quality wins over the other 2, but the rest of the Big 12...kind of sucks. TCU already has a win over Oklahoma State and they still trail the Buckeyes in the initial rankings. A Cowboy win in Bedlam this weekend, though it would weaken Ohio State's resume a bit, would likely solve the Big 12 problem. Otherwise, Oklahoma could throw a wrench into the works.

#7 Penn State / #9 Wisconsin
If Ohio State wins out, it'll have wins over both of these teams and a better overall resume than both. Root for both of them to keep winning.

#12 Washington
Washington's schedule is, to be charitable, lacking, and it has no prospect of improving in any meaningful way.

So really, Ohio State only has to realistically fear 4 other teams in the playoff chase: the SEC champion, Notre Dame, Clemson, and Oklahoma. What are the odds that ALL of the latter 3 win out? Not good.

Keep calm and just win. 

Rankings and Heisman Ballots - After Week 9

Rankings, as always, are based on what teams have done so far, not how we believe they will finish. Leave us a comment and tell us who ain't played nobody, Pawwwwwwwwl.

Let's Go Bucks Index
1a. Alabama
1b. Georgia
3a. Notre Dame
3b. Ohio State
5. Wisconsin
6. Clemson
7. Miami
8. Oklahoma
9. Penn State
10. TCU
11. Oklahoma State
12. Virginia Tech
13. Iowa State
14. Washington
15. UCF
16. USC
17. Auburn
18. Mississippi State
19. Michigan State
20a. Arizona
20b. NC State
20c. Stanford
23a. LSU
23b. Washington State
25. Memphis 

Others receiving votes: NC State, South Carolina, South Florida, Michigan

Let's Go Bucks Index
1. JT Barrett (QB--Ohio State)
2a. Bryce Love (RB--Stanford)
2b. Baker Mayfield (QB--Oklahoma) 



Draper

Top 25
1. Georgia
2. Alabama
3. Notre Dame
4. Ohio State
5. Clemson
6. Wisconsin
7. Oklahoma
8. TCU
9. Penn State
10. Miami
11. Oklahoma State
12. Virginia Tech
13. Iowa State
14. Washington
15. USC
16. Mississippi State
17. LSU
18. Auburn
19. NC State
20. UCF 
21. Arizona
22. Washington State
23. Michigan State
24. Stanford
25. Memphis

Heisman Ballot
1. Baker Mayfield (QB: OU)
2. J. T. Barrett IV (QB: OSU)
3. Saquon Barkley (RB: PSU)


Hoying

Top 25
1. Georgia
2. Alabama
3. Wisconsin
4. Miami
5. Notre Dame
6. Clemson
7. Ohio State
8. Penn State
9. TCU
10. Oklahoma
11. UCF
12. Virginia Tech
13. Oklahoma State
14. Iowa State
15. Auburn
16. Mississippi State
17. Michigan State
18. Memphis
19. Washington State
20. USC
21. South Carolina
22. Washington
23. NC State
24. LSU
25. Arizona

Heisman Ballot
1. Baker Mayfield (QB--Oklahoma)
2. JT Barrett (QB--Ohio State)
3. Bryce Love (RB--Stanford)


Schweinfurth

Top 25
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. Oklahoma
4. OSU
5. Notre Dame
6. Miami
7. Clemson
8. TCU
9. Penn State
10. Wisconsin
11. Oklahoma State
12. Washington
13. USC
14. Iowa State
15. N. C. State
16. UCF
17. Virginia Tech
18. Stanford
19. Arizona
20. Michigan State
21. Washington State
22. LSU
23. Memphis
24. Mississippi State
25. Michigan

Heisman Ballot
1. J.T. Barrett, QB Ohio State
2. Bryce Love, RB Stanford
3. Saquon Barkley, RB Penn State

Seeberg

Top 25
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. Ohio State
4. Wisconsin
5. Notre Dame
6. Clemson
7. Virginia Tech
8. Miami
9. Oklahoma
10. Penn State
11. Oklahoma State
12. Washington
13. Iowa State
14. TCU
15. Auburn
16. UCF
17. USC
18. Stanford
19. NC State
20. Mississippi State
21. Arizona
22. Michigan State
23. South Florida
24. Memphis
25. LSU

Heisman Ballot
1.) Bryce Love, RB Stanford
2.) J.T. Barrett, QB Ohio State
3.) Josh Adams, RB Notre Dame