Standings:
1.) Draper 33-12 (1-8 upset)
1.) Schweinfurth 33-12 (1-8 upset)
3.) Hoying 31-14 (2-7 upset)
4.) Seeberg 30-15 (3-6 upset)
One consequence to Urban building his entire Ohio State staff out of past and future head coaches is that you start seeing former Buckeyes everywhere. The opponent of the week is the architect of two terrific (and one terrible) Buckeye defenses, and the sine qua non of a successful Rutgers season. Elsewhere, the top contenders in three of the other four Power 5 conferences (Florida State, you're excused until December) face opportunities to seize strangeholds on their respective conference races, or open the door to that sweet sweet November chaos.
Hoying: Who would have thought that Kansas State's mid-September matchup against Missouri would turn out to be such a clash of conference heavyweights? That one was decided by a last second 61-yard field goal, which I don't see happening this week as Texas's kicker hasn't converted from beyond 50 yet this year (no Dicker the Kicker to save you this time). This is the week that we find out if Texas is truly back or if Quinn Ewers has been papering over a thin team that can't handle adversity. The Longhorns darn near let Oklahoma beat them twice as they barely pulled out of a nosedive against Houston the following week. The same Houston that KSU just obliterated seven days ago. With Ewers still out with a bum shoulder, it'll be up to freshman QB Maalik Murphy to command the UT offense, and while BYU posed no threat to his coming out party last week, that was BYU. K-State is the reigning Big 12 champs, and they're not about to let one of the SEC turncoats steal the last Power 5 crown the league has to offer. The Wildcats put Texas's red zone woes on full display as they inch closer to a title defense. KSU: 28--UT: 23
Hoying: A month or so ago I wondered when Georgia was going to wake up and start taking this season seriously. The answer was "right then" as they steamrolled Kentucky and haven't looked back since. I may have also said that Kentucky might have been the best team left on Georgia's regular season schedule, which looks like weapons-grade stupidity at this point. Georgia now kicks off a three game slate of ranked opponents, any of which is good enough to take down the Dawgs on any given day, but which also provide a path for Georgia to vault to #1 in the Playoff rankings with wins over all three (until The Game, that is). Missouri is the first up, a team with a great underrated QB in Brady Cook buy not much run game to speak of. That hasn't limited the Tigers much so far (other than dooming them with a late pick six against LSU) but Georgia's vulnerability is on the ground, not through the air. Cook has been a difference maker on the ground as well in Mizzou's last two wins but I think he'll find the Georgia D a bit beyond his skill to solve. Georgia's not invincible but they aren't stumbling this week. Mizzou: 17--UGA: 34
Seeberg: The worst part about this matchup is that after the Bulldogs win, Missouri will still be ranked and it will be a quality win even when Missouri loses again, inevitably, and falls from the rankings entirely *heavy sigh*. UGA cruises. Mizzou: 17--UGA: 34
Hoying: So I know that after Oklahoma's loss to Kansas last week there's about 13 teams tied for the Big 12 lead, and technically Oklahoma State is one of them. But the stink of losing to South Alabama (USA! USA!) by twenty-six doesn't wash off quickly. This is a team with serious problems behind center, especially compared against what could be Heisman dark horse candidate Dillon Gabriel taking snaps for the Sooners. Do the Cowboys at least have a defensive advantage to offset their deficiencies with the ball in their hands? Nope, OU has them outclassed in every sense on the other side of the ball as well. I'm sure that Okie State would be glad to get one last laugh over big brother before another wave of mediocre teams arrives to replace them, but there's just no advantage to press here. OU: 31--OkSt: 20
Hoying: Is Washington OK? It's easy to look at this matchup and notice that USC hasn't put 4 quarters of good football together since walloping Stanford the same day of the Jim Tressel Bowl in Columbus, buuut that Stanford team? They were trailing the Huskies by 2 points with 2 minutes left to go last week. And the week before that, it took a red zone pick-six for UW to get past awful Arizona State. I'm still not convinced the Huskies are the best team in the Pac-12; in fact, every week cements my belief that they're still not as good as Oregon. That being said, you don't need to be at your absolute best to get by USC, although you do need to be on your game in the 4th quarter, as that was where Arizona and Cal saw potential huge upsets slip away. Unfortunately for the Trojans, that's the money quarter for UW as well. There's plenty of time to slip up on the upcoming stretch run for Washington; this won't be the week. UW: 42--USC: 35
Seeberg: If ever you needed proof that brands matter, look no further than USC. With an atrocious defense, two losses and their best win a 2-point squeaker over 5-3 Arizona, and they sit at 20th in the CFP poll. Outlandish. Thankfully, that will no longer be an issue because the former Heisman winner has no defense to back him up, and quite possibly the future Heisman winner (former IU quarterback! That's still hilarious to me) can sling it. No chance USC gets enough stops to stay in this one. Huskies roll. UW: 45--USC: 26
Hoying: You want to know why name isn't at the top of the standings kicking off each weekly post? Because I'm the sap that keeps picking Alabama to lose games. Ole Miss, Texas A&M, clearly I'm not learning my lesson about the inevitability of Nick Saban. But heaven help me, it's time to dive into that snake pit again. This game is strength on strength and struggle on struggle as arguably the nation's best defense in the Tide attempts to slow what is less arguably the nation's best offense behind Jayden Daniels. But when the possession changes, get ready to watch Jaylen Milroe try to get anything cooking against what might as well be air. This is the bizarro version of last year's Bama that couldn't quite keep up with an LSU attack that was gashing them repeatedly on the ground. But the Tigers might be even better this year with the ball and Alabama has been vulnerable week to week during the first half. The danger for LSU is that Bama lives or dies on the big plays and the Tigers are seemingly incapable of doing anything to keep the offense in front of them. That being said, way back in September, just when it seemed like the Crimson Death Star was surging back to seize another marquee nonconference win, Quinn Ewers and Texas exploded for three fourth-quarter TDs to salt the game away. Look for LSU to get punched in the mouth but refuse to heed the bell. LSU: 35--Bama: 31
Seeberg: Quite possibly the game of the week in Tuscaloosa. I keep hearing a lot of Jayden Daniels Heisman chatter, which I find weird given the two losses already, and one in which he didn't look too good (FSU). This game could make those conversations legitimate if he can run and throw it on the Tide. Bama looked shockingly competent on offense in the second half against Tennessee. It may have been an aberration, but I do know that Nick Saban had an extra week of prep for this one. The offense should be primed and the defense will use that Heisman talk as motivation. Bama wins an entertaining one. LSU: 27--Bama: 34
Hoying: For what seems like the millionth time since the Maryland game, the Buckeyes face a team that can't move the ball, especially through the air. Which means that this is a guaranteed W unless the mistakes just start cascading from behind center. Even two picks last week were only enough to pull Wisconsin within two scores at home. Rutgers might have an even better defense than the Badgers but they are a total shambles at quarterback. You thought McCord struggled against Wisconsin? The Rutgers passing attack put up a ghastly 5.5 yards per attempt while getting wrecked by the Badgers, with a pick-six to boot. Losing Lathan Ransom is less than ideal but next-man-up Sonny Styles and the rest of the Buckeye secondary should feast against Rutgers QB Gavin Wimsatt and co. Of course, you have to score points to win, and as it turns out Rutgers also has a pretty bad run defense. It's time to see whether the shot in the arm that a healthy Tre gave to the ground game is here to stay or just a nice present from Fick last week. I'm betting on the Buckeye O getting their groove back notwithstanding Schiano's bag of tricks and treats off the bye week. On to the home cupcakes and then................. OSU: 31--RSUNJ: 10
Seeberg: Well, like I predicted, things got weird in Mad-town last week. McCord struggled mightily (that whole "I throw of my back foot if I even kinda feel pressure" thing finally caught up to him), but hey, we have a run game again! Thanks Treveyon. Meanwhile, Rutgers is...competent?? Better than Virginia Tech?? Bowl eligible before November??? Somehow, all of these statements are accurate. Schiano is maximizing that Knights' roster, and we all know he will pull out all the stops against opponents like the Buckeyes. Still, Emeka may be good to go, and Marvin Harrison Jr. is simply a cheat code. Hopefully there's no dust ups about a fake punt again. Stay healthy and get out of Piscataway with some rhythm for Kyle and a solid W. RU: 13--OSU: 31
Upset Special
Draper: Virginia Tech over Louisville
Hoying: Colorado over Oregon State
Schweinfurth: Iowa State over Kansas
Seeberg: Maryland over Penn State
No comments:
Post a Comment