Week 9: Jeremiah's Odyssey

Standings:

1.) Schweinfurth 22-12 (1-7 upset)
2.) Draper 21-13 (3-5 upset)
3.) Seeberg 20-14 (3-5 upset)
4.) Hoying 18-16 (1-7 upset)

Much like the Greeks spending 10 long years on the shores of the outskirts of Ilion, the Buckeyes have spent a long time waiting for the opportunity to sack the Trojans. Hopefully, for the first time in ages, they finally have the horses to do it.

Arizona Wildcats @ Texas Tech Red Raiders

Draper: Are the Wildcats for real? Did Texas Tech just drop a fluke in Cincinnati or were they exposed? I think it's a little bit of both for both teams.  Arizona has quietly navigated a Big 12 schedule with only one loss (to BYU on the road).  They also destroyed UC who just beat the Raiders, but their best win is....West Virginia or Cincinnati...yawn.  Texas Tech had been begging for a loss and it finally caught up to them in Nippert, but I tend to think they have more 'dudes'.  Their best win is in Corvallis vs the only team in the state of Oregon receiving AP votes.  In a tight game like this, I'll favor the home team, but I think it's going to be a weird one.  Zona: 24--TTU: 30

Hoying: We've reached the "gotta rank somebody" portion of the season (which, as far as the Big 12 is concerned may as well be the entire season) so get ready for Texas Tech to host ranked Arizona. The Wildcats' main claim to fame is obliterating the Cincinnati team that just pantsed the Red Raiders last weekend. The collapse of the new-look Red Raiders' air of Big 12 invincibility has put them into a bit of a panic mode. TTech is considering platooning the QB position now that the endless eligible/ineligible struggle between the NCAA and the American legal system has flipped back to "let 'em play" and 5th-year senior QB Thomas Castellanos (go Noles) can take the field again. Neither Tech QB is quite Brendan Soresby but at least we can expect some deep throws to left if Castellanos is behind center. I'd be inclined to pick Arizona on a neutral field, but the home team saved me in the Utah/Houston tossup last week so let's keep rolling with that logic. Zona: 17--TTU: 23

Schweinfurth: Texas Tech's defense has been enough to carry them so far this year. I don't see why that won't continue this week. Zona: 14--TTU: 21

Seeberg: Well, Texas Tech’s mediocre QB play finally caught up to them last week as Will Hammond was good for 6 yards per attempt, no TDs and a pick in their upset loss down in the 513. Now the ranked(?) Wildcats come to town, their only loss at BYU, a game they led at half. Had the Red Raiders not “got got” last week I would say they were primed to fall in this one. However, BYU shut out Arizona in the second half of their contest, and Tech has a good enough defense to emulate much of that. Should be a good one, Tech survives. Zona: 17—TTU: 20

Florida Gators vs. Georgia Bulldogs

Draper: The World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party used to be must see TV....now? no one cares.  I would honestly not be surprised if the Dr. Jekyll UF team showed up and beat the Dawgs, but that's not the highest of probability events.  Georgia was exposed in Jordan-Hare as average like the rest of the teams in CFB since no one is good.  Regardless, I expect Kirby and squad to return to power here.  Fla: 13--UGA: 23

Hoying: I feel like Georgia is easy to peg as one of the best teams in college football this year: good enough to win all their games but look out for the occasional faceplant. Good luck figuring out Florida though. The offense is pretty good (unless it's blowing up against Ole Miss or stifled against Missouri), but the defense is a horror show (unless it's shutting down Texas). Back in the days of twice-in-a-lifetime coaches like Urban and Spurrier, it didn't matter how good Georgia was; they were going to lose to the Gators. But I'm not sure Jon Sumrall is that same level of elite. Lots of teams have had their moments in the sun this season, and Florida's has already come and gone, in rather ugly fashion. As a football program, Florida strikes me as consistently mediocre except when elevated by the two shining stars I already mentioned. That's where I'm going to keep them until I see something truly special from the coaching staff or a real game changer on the field. Florida doesn't have either right now. They have QB Aaron Philo back but that didn't save them against Missouri or South Carolina. Dawgs roll. Fla: 20--UGA: 31

Schweinfurth: Everyone was in love with the Gators to start this year. Now they've turned into random SEC team B. Not an elite team and not a bad team, just a mushy middle team. Georgia on the other hand is speeding (like what I did there?) their way to another SEC championship and a first round playoff bye. Yea, it's a rivalry game, but the Dawgs are the much better team here. Fla: 17--UGA: 35

Seeberg: Assuming the hangover from the Bama game is complete now, I think, offensive inconsistencies aside, UGA is just plain better. The Gators are an absolute roller coaster this year but they need four quarters of their best ball to win this one and I don’t think they’re capable. Go Dogs. Fla: 17—UGA: 27

Northwestern Wildcats @ Oregon Ducks

Draper: This is the best game of the day (outside of LA -- maybe), and I just have no good take on it.  The 6-1 Northwestern Wildcats go to Eugene to face the 4-3 Oregon Ducks who are reeling like crazy...but favored!  No matter the result here, the Duck faithful have to be incredibly disappointed with their season while it's pure house money for the Wildcats.  Chip Kelly has the Northwestern offense flying high (why didn't we get him back again?) but this is a must win for Dan Lanning and the Ducks before their trip to <checks schedule> Columbus next week....yikes.  Honestly, this feels like a return to normalcy game to me.  Northwestern will scrap the hell out of it, but the Autzen Zoo will be too much.  It's like when Cignetti brought the Hoosiers there last year....the difference is NW doesn't have the horses like Indiana did.  NW: 24--Ore: 27

Hoying: If you're going to watch two games this weekend, make this the second one, because you'll get some great insight into what the Buckeyes will face during their upcoming home slate. This one is probably going to come down to whether Oregon can pick itself up off the mat and finish the season. Something is really rotten in Eugene, with the awful playcalling selling games the Ducks should easily win or the alcohol-induced wide receiver street racing at 7 AM (and not because they're getting up early). At least the Ducks finally fired offensive coordinator Drew Mehringer after trotting out abominations like this. Nobody tell Michigan you're allowed to do that. Northwestern's been better than anyone gave them a right to be this season, but they've been beating up on the dregs of the college football world and didn't look all that great against awful awful Michigan State. Dan Lanning may fade in the biggest matchups but I don't think he's a chump. He'll be able to put the band back together for one last hurrah before getting his doors blown off next week. NW: 20--Ore: 24

Schweinfurth: I am not sold on either team here. Oregon is getting the Dan Lanning reckoning he deserves. Northwestern has come out of nowhere to have a ridiculous running game (hello Chip Kelly). The Ducks seem to be demoralized and watching the season slipping away. Honestly, I don't think they have the heart to fight here. Northwestern's run game demoralizes another team. NW: 24--Ore: 21

Seeberg: Yet another game where any outcome feels plausible. If you had NW as the only ranked team in this one preseason, no you didn’t (or you have Marty Mcfly’s reference book). Northwestern is good. Chip can still play-call the college level with the best of them. Their TE has 11 catches all season, but had SEVEN FOR ONE FORTY in their close loss at IU. If any matchup actually favors the Wildcats, Chip will exploit it. The talent gap, however, is wide and a cross-country trip can be disorienting, though west-coast teams seem to struggle more than the other way around. Oregon should lean on the run. Their two main backs had 27 carries for 175 against Illinois and Lee Bebee went for over 200 against the Wildcats. Assuming they’re smart enough to not let Raiola beat them, the Ducks do just enough to get back on track before heading to Columbus. Yay. NW: 17—Ore: 22

THE Ohio State University Buckeyes @ University of Southern California Trojans

Draper: The Buckeyes return to action without their field general behind center.  There is mass panic in the streets, but let's not pretend Sayin was lighting the scoreboard on fire last time we saw him (and no, Sayin is the starter if/when healthy you jackals).  All this talk about not naming a QB until today was all smoke and mirrors getting Tavien to bring it in practice.  Fahey was always the guy, but you always need to be ready for emergencies.  One thing I do know, #4 will still be on the Buckeye side which provides a massive advantage.  The key here is that USC's defense is just terrible.  Their offense is very good, but so is our defense.  I expect some points to be put up by the Trojans which will lead to all Buckeye Nation clamoring for blood, but if Timmons doesn't go, it will be tough to keep them out of the endzone.  Thankfully, this is a nice ease in for Fahey defensively and there won't be any opposing fans there to cause problems.  It will be a little dicey early (expect an early 3 and out or a turnover, but the Bucks will settle in and Bo will have a day.  OSU: 34--USC: 20

Hoying: The Buckeyes enter a house of horrors on Halloween night. This was the matchup I was most looking forward to in the new amalgamous Big [number] due to the history between these teams, but the Buckeyes would rather leave the Los Angeles chapter out of the history books. Ohio State hasn't won at the Coliseum since 1946. They haven't scored a touchdown there since 1949. But the ghosts of John McKay and Pete Carroll are long gone from the SC sidelines. Yes, Lincoln Riley stormed into Columbus in his head coaching debuted and facilitated Baker's flag planting beatdown but his tenure with the Trojans has been disappointing at best. I mean, this year Oregon backup QB Dylan Raiola entered mid-game against the Trojans and looked like Trevor Lawrence, and that's the only time he's looked half competent all season (or maybe in his entire career). That's good news for newly minted Ohio State starting QB Luke Fahey, who probably never dreamed that his warmup game would be against one of the unquestioned blue chip programs in the history of the sport. Under other circumstances, this could have been a trap game for the Buckeyes, as the Trojans have the pieces to be dangerous despite this season's missteps. But now SC has the Buckeyes' full attention, not unlike Texas last year. And just like Texas last year, Ohio State can win even if their brand new starting QB doesn't ball out. And let's not worry too much about the rest of the season either. Julian Sayin played the worst game of his career to date (maybe his entire career period with the way things are looking), and the Buckeyes still knocked off the defending national champions on the road. The offense just needs to learn the lesson the defense took to heart after the Illinois game: do your job and don't try to play hero ball. Except Jeremiah, you do all the heroic things. Absent a lot of mistakes from behind center, this one shouldn't be a problem. Troy delenda est. OSU: 27--USC: 16

Schweinfurth: Where do we begin. USCs passing defense is bad, I mean really bad. Jeramiah could go for 300 yards this week, even with a freshman QB. This won't be the pack of wolves Fahey was thrown into at Indiana. That poor kid looked like a deer caught in the headlights. Day has had two weeks to get him prepped for this and figure out how Fahey moves the offense. The defense will get tested a bit. USC can, and will, stretch the field. Just keep it simple for Fahey and throw it to #4. He'll be open all day. OSU: 35--USC: 17

Seeberg: I…am conflicted on this one. On one hand, Day refusing to name a starting QB makes it harder for the Trojans’ semblance of a defense to game plan. However, if Day actually doesn’t know who the starter will be, that’s concerning. I’m assuming Fahey since he clearly passed St. Clair on the depth chart and his skill set seems similar to Julian’s so the plans won’t require as much tweaking. I BEG Ryan to show him Joe Germaine highlights. Phenomenal accuracy, average arm strength, but still hit deep balls in stride by getting the ball out early. Siereveld back helps, but Timmons popping up as questionable again is scary (for the love of all things holy do NOT leave Calhoun on an island). Get JJ involved in any way possible, bend but don’t break on D, and get out of Pasadena with a W. OSU: 27—USC: 20

Upset Special
Draper: North Carolina over Miami
Hoying: Cincinnati over Utah
Schweinfurth: Minnesota over Indiana
Seeberg: Virginia over Wake Forest

Week 8: Hello, Good Bye

Standings:

1.) Schweinfurth 20-10 (0-7 upset)
2.) Draper 19-11 (2-5 upset)
3.) Seeberg 18-12 (2-5 upset)
4.) Hoying 16-14 (1-6 upset)

It's never fun to go a football weekend without seeing the Buckeyes take the field, but Buckeye Nation can and should heave a sigh of relief that the season second half gauntlet gives one last chance to rest up, kick the tires, and put in the plan for the stretch run. 

Indiana Hoosiers @ Michigan Wolverines

Draper: The Wolverine faithful finally have a changing of the guard as their $12 million dollar man has been shown the door. Is Carr the savior they are hoping for? I lean....no...but it might be better than Underwood. Regardless, IU may be beat up after last week's loss, but they are far better than the Maize and Blue.; Hoover was atrocious vs. OSU but a lot of this can be attributed to Matt Patricia and Co. scUM has a very good defense, but I don't think they're going to be able to move the ball against the grown men on the Hoosier defense. Expect a low scoring affair, but there is no reason for IU to slip up. IU: 20--UM: 10

Hoying: How sure are we that (i) Indiana is good, and (ii) Michigan is bad? I feel more confident about (ii) than (i). Racking up all of 21 points at home against Penn State isn't really moving the needle. Yeah, the offense looked better after the QB switch, but this is the same Lion defense that got absolutely run over by Northwestern. I don't expect the Wolverines to find much room on the ground against the Hoosier front. So, much like last week, the outcome hinges on whether Indiana can move the ball. Josh Hoover missed a good amount of throws last week even when not being pressured, and he seemed to be racking up damage as the game progressed, even though the Indiana injury report for this week is magically completely blank. We've seen that late game end zone magic favors Michigan and not Indiana this season, but I'm thinking the Hoosiers can put the game out of reach before that becomes an issue. Late score keeps it close. IU: 24--Mich: 20

Schweinfurth: Indiana is like a cockroach. You seriously can’t kill them if there is time on the clock. Every game seems close and somehow the Hoosiers come out with a win (except last week. Ball don’t lie). The Bucks did a good job keeping the IU running backs in check. Hoover won’t have another game like last week. The UM defense is good, but I don’t know if they are as good as Ohio States. UM will have to move the ball and that could be a problem. IU wins late, again. IU: 21—Mich: 17

Seeberg: If you are unfortunate enough to have a Twitter feed replete with college football talk this time of year you will see a lot of false hope from fan bases, often bordering on the delusional. Such is the case with our neighbors to the north, new hope injected in the form of benching their $12 million quarterback. However, an angry IU team is rolling in and that team made Sayin look pedestrian. Good luck in your first start against that front Tommy. Hoosiers roll. IU: 24—UM: 13

Iowa Hawkeyes @ Minnesota Golden Gophers

Draper: Iowa was the flavor of the month before they returned to Earth after OSU took care of business. Regardless, you might need to have a talk with your children about 'playoff Iowa' given their schedule. This is a tricky game for the Hawkeyes to navigate under the blood god, PJ Fleck. I still lean to the Hawkeye defense and tight ends..but don't be surprised if the Gophers make this interesting.  Iowa: 20--Minn: 17

Hoying: UCLA continues to occupy the top spot in the Big Ten standings, but Iowa is hanging around, ready to snap up a Big Ten championship berth and even a potential Playoff spot if they can navigate the rest of their schedule. You might think that the days of Iowa going to Indianapolis died with the Big Ten West. I would respond with the Hawkeyes' remaining schedule: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Purdue, Illinois, and Nebraska. Look familiar? Iowa already navigated Ohio State and Michigan and trip to the west coast with only one blemish; now they're right back where they belong. Minnesota, like Iowa, showed some flashes of brilliance against Michigan and Iowa, but getting blasted by Purdue last week didn't really inspire confidence. Keep an eye on this year's bizarre Big Ten race; the unbalanced schedules are really making their presence known this year. Iowa: 31--Minn: 20

Schweinfurth: Iowa looks like a legit playoff contender this year. That defense is good. Minnesota has had some nice moments, but PJ Fleck has a ceiling. In typical Iowa fashion, low scoring and a rock fight, the Hawks win. Iowa: 21—Minn: 10

Seeberg: Is Minnesota good? Sometimes. Is Iowa good? Nearly always. The Hawkeyes consistency over four quarters is the difference here. A few too many gopher mistakes are all the black and yellow will need. Iowa: 27—Minn: 13

Mississippi Rebels @ Texas Longhorns

Draper: Sneaky game in Austin as the Rebels invade with Chambliss looking like he might will his team to the playoff.  While Ole Miss is on the upswing, Texas is down BAD. Losses to OU in the Red River Shootout and blowing a lead vs. the Jekyll and Hyde Gators have placed the Horns on the brink of....dare I say it...playoff elimination? While Texas MAY be able to navigate a 3rd loss, it would be extremely precarious. The rest of the SEC has shown that a 2nd loss 'ain't no thang' so long as you're in the right conference. I think I'm going to regret this, but Texas has plenty of talent on both sides of the ball. I can't see them dropping another with their backs against the wall. Arch plays average, but the Longhorn defense makes Trinidad turn the ball over.Hook them.Miss: 20--UT: 27

Hoying: I've almost given up trying to figure out the SEC. Texas has gone from a strong #1 ranking with two ranked wins that only keep getting better, to back-to-back faceplants against middling competition. Arch appears to have crested, to the point that Sark was discussing splitting reps with backup KJ Lacey this week. Meanwhile Ole Miss slammed the door on the Missouri running game on their way to a total rout. I don't know if I can trust the Texas passing game to outscore Ole Miss in this one. I would say Texas is a tough place to play but apparently that's only true if it's 150 degrees on the field. The long Longhorn skid continues, with no end in sight. Miss: 27--UT: 20

Schweinfurth: Look, all the noise around Arch Manning is a nothing burger. However, there are a lot of Longhorns out of this game. That could be rough for the Longhorns here. A loss here and Sark’s seat turns into an inferno. Regardless, Texas is desperate and should play that way. Texas should win, unless their Longhorn AI gets involved (so dumb). Miss: 24—UT: 31

Seeberg: This one has all the feel of a Longhorn bounce back game, save for the laundry list of injuries they are dealing with, Colin Simmons chief among them. Sark can’t fix the offense, and the defensive injuries mean they won’t get enough stops. Run Rebs run. Miss: 31—UT: 20

Houston Cougars @ Utah Utes

Draper:The Utes are the undefeated team no one knows or cares..but one look at their schedule would make Notre Dame blush.The sheer number of cupcakes thus far are astounding. Dampier is a very good QB, but I don't have a lot of faith that they can keep this streak going all year. The Cougs only loss is a close one vs the Big12 preseason top dog Texas Tech. Rice Eccles is a tough place to play, but I feel like the Cougars are battle tested. Houston pulls the upset and clears the path for the other Cougars and Red Raiders. UH: 27--Utah: 20

Hoying: For the second week in a row, the college football world revolves around the state of Utah. And just like BYU last week, Utah has played a half-dozen wet sacks of garbage coming into this one. Of course, that didn't stop the Cougars last week and it doesn't have to stop the Utes here. The Houston defense has been suspect all season, which is a real problem when you're playing a Ute team that can hurt you through the air or on the ground. I'm not going to pick against the home team with the home crowd having all day to get whipped into a frenzy. The gravy train continues for Utah. UH: 24--Utah: 31

Schweinfurth: Look, I don’t know if either team can really hang with the elites. But it doesn’t matter. Utah lost a lot when Whittingham retired. I do think he kept that train rolling. I just don’t see it with what’s left now. Houston wins. UH: 35—Utah: 21

Seeberg: This is an intriguing one. Feels like these teams are pretty evenly matched. I do think Houston has a decent shot to make Utah one-dimensional as their run game isn’t great. Utah is always good at home though. I’m torn. When torn, go with the home team. UH: 24—Utah: 27

Upset Special
Draper: UCF over BYU
Hoying: Rutgers over Northwestern
Schweinfurth: Wisconsin over USC
Seeberg: West Virginia over TCU

Week 7: Crimson and Over

Standings:

1.) Schweinfurth 17-8 (0-6 upset)
2.) Draper 16-9 (1-5 upset)
2.) Seeberg 16-9 (2-4 upset)
4.) Hoying 13-12 (1-5 upset)

The second half of the season kicks off not with a bang but with a volley, as eight teams within the top 15 face off against each other. But in the era of the 12-team playoff, none of these may mean as much as the Battle of Mid staging up north as two erstwhile powerhouses try to stay on course just to play 13.

Alabama Crimson Tide @ Tennessee Volunteers

Draper: Bama just got snakebitten in a truly even contest vs. the Dawgs last week (and they were hosed at the end).  Regardless, an L is and L and no one will care in 2 weeks.  Tennessee almost pulled off the upset at home vs. the Longhorns, but I don't know if they have enough in the tank without standout freshman QB Faizon Brandon.  This game will have HUGE implications for Kalen Deboer's future in Tuscaloosa.  Honestly, he cannot afford to drop this one.  Last week was a standstill, but this is a game you can drop when the team looks back to the top tier.  The Tide roll in Knoxville because you can't spell Citrus without UT (this joke makes a lot more sense back when bowls mattered).  Bama: 34--Tenn: 17

Hoying: Starting a true freshman at QB rarely works out well unless your name is Trevor Lawrence or Tua Tagovailoa. And it hasn't worked out well for Tennessee, who have been just ghastly through the air this season. Turning to RS freshman George MacIntyre after Faizon Brandon went down against Texas hasn't exactly helped matters either, as the Vols struggled to beat SEC basement dwellers Auburn and Arkansas. The run game is all right, certainly better than Alabama's, but the Tide didn't exactly dim their image with a hard-fought closely decided match against #1 Georgia last week. Tennessee does create a lot of havoc in the backfield, which leads to a lot of 3rd down stops, but we saw last week that Alabama QB Keelon Russell can create on his own even when his receivers aren't open. Things aren't going to get any easier for UT anytime soon, time to drop that fraudulent ranking off their name. Bama: 27--Tenn: 17

Schweinfurth: I’ve gotta say, Bama is pretty decent. A loss to Georgia really isn’t that big of a deal here. Meanwhile, Tennessee is who I thought they were. Meh. Bama should roll here and fire up the cigars. Bama: 35—Tenn: 10

Seeberg:  Not much needs said here. Bama is pretty solid, Tennessee is…meh? Bama pulls away in the second half. Bama: 31—Tenn: 17

Pennsylvania State Nittany Lions @ Michigan Wolverines

Draper: Why? Michigan appears to be returning to "what we thought they were" while Penn State just looks dead in the water.  This shows you the volatility of college football and the extreme success OSU has had over the last..60-70 years.  Franklin can't win the big one but wins 10 games every year...then they move on and it looks over.  TTUN may suck at offense (they do) but their defense is still pretty good.  I don't see how the Lions go on the road and score enough to matter.  I lean the under, but scUM gets a win they can pretend matters.  PSU: 10--UM: 17

Hoying: Wait, Penn State and Michigan are playing a game to see who gets to pull their season out of a nosedive? Tell me we're not reliving the dumbest year in modern history again! No, the calendar hasn't turned back to 2020, but these teams' fortunes have. Matt Campbell has brought Iowa State style mediocrity to Penn State, where the only happy thought in the valley is the upcoming schedule of trash after trash. But the Lions will have to get by Michigan first, who are facing the terrifying prospect of having their season highlight be a buzzer trailing Hail Mary victory against a directional MAC team. Whatever you want to say about Michigan, their defense is pretty great and would almost definitely not give up 413 yards on the ground to a Chip Kelly offense (don't ask me how I know). Yeah, Bryce Underwood is worse than worthless but the biggest beatdown the Wolverines ever put on PSU was when Wilton Speight was quarterback. Penn State doesn't really have anything to threaten Michigan with on either side of the ball, not even leading rusher...James Peoples?!? The Cheat Weasels continue their slog toward bowl eligibility. PSU: 20--UM: 24

Schweinfurth: Both of these teams suck. There, I said it. Yes, Penn State may have the people’s champ, but they aren’t great. Michigan is going to move off of Underwood here and start a freshman. Yikes. Enjoy the slop fest while we try to avoid the game traffic (in the forbidden city for a hockey tournament). PSU: 13—UM:14

Seeberg: Avert your eyes if you’re queasy, this one won’t be a pretty watch. I trust neither of these teams but still have a modicum of faith in Whittingham and home field advantage. Close enough. PSU: 13—UM: 17

Missouri Tigers @ Mississippi Rebels

Draper: The SEC's Circle of Mid continues.  Win a huge game? Bomb the next... Mizzou look like they might be a team to look at to make a little noise....HAH! This feels like the trap that we keep falling into in SEC-country.  The Tigers roll into the Grove but Ole Miss already took out one set of Tigers, why not another? Chambliss feels due for another big game where he wills the so-so offense outside of him to a home victory.  Mizz: 20--Miss:37

Hoying: Does anybody know that this is a top 15 matchup? Does anybody really care? Ole Miss continues to garner a lot of praise for squeaking by Louisville (3-3) and LSU (4-2) before getting blasted by freefalling Florida. I'm getting the feeling that the farther they get from Lane the worse they're going to become, and pasting Vanderbilt last week didn't really do anything convince me otherwise. I'm not sure Missouri is any great shakes either but they have been a great deal more consistent of late, including kicking off the "Florida are frauds" campaign. I like the Tigers to keep rolling behind their punishing defense, getting one last tuneup next week at Arkansas before a punishing November slate. Mizz: 27--Miss: 24

Schweinfurth: More overrated SEC slop. I don’t believe in either team. Ole Miss might be better, but Mizzou doesn’t win big SEC games. Roll with the Rebs, I guess. Mizz:21—Miss: 24

Seeberg: Hate that Mizzou is the latest beneficiary of the SEC rankings. Still don’t trust them since the Gators are garbage. Plus it’s fun to see Lane’s former team succeed. Go Rebs Mizz: 27—Miss: 38

Notre Dame Fighting Irish @ Brigham Young Cougars

Draper: The first of the 2-game season for Notre Dame kicks off in Provo.  I'm VERY tempted to call for the upset as the Cougs are a very solid team and LaVell Edwards Stadium will be on fire (if anyone has tickets for under $300, let me know!).  The Irish have looked fine and won by a reasonably solid margin every week, but they certainly haven't won every game comfortably.   Bear has been fantastic, but the loss of LJ Martin will really hamper the run game for the Cougars.  I have a feeling this game will be back and forth, but I think the Irish squeak out a victory.  If the Cougs were healthy, I'd flip the switch, but sadly, the Irish stay alive.  ND: 24--BYU: 20 (Seriously, I'm in Utah and and hoping to go to the game.  I will take whatever charity you'd like to send!)

Hoying: I know everyone likes to dog on Notre Dame's schedule this season (this is their first appearance on Let's Go Bucks! for one) but BYU's might be even worse, because they play in the Big 12. The same Big 12 that hasn't had a win in the CFP since TCU knocked Cheaters v2 out back in 2022 (the Big 12's only ever CFP win, and we thank you for your service). Anyway, has any team looked as good through 6 games as the Irish? I guess taking that extra month off to rest at the end of last season has really paid dividends. But this weekend we'll see if BYU's Pop-Tart Bowl experience proves to be the winning edge in this one. In a normal year this battle of QBs would be a potential Heisman resume lynchpin, but it seems that race is more or less a foregone conclusion at this point. BYU's going to need all the production they can muster as the Irish have the top defensive success rate in the nation, and pair it with an offense producing quality drives 79% of the time. This one gives me a weird feeling. LaVell is going to be rocking as the sunset paints Y Mountain. The Cougs shock the world and move into the driver's seat for a Playoff berth. ND: 23--BYU: 24

Schweinfurth: I’m not sold on BYU yet. They can move the ball, but Notre Dame just looks like a complete team. There is a very slim path for BYU to win this for me. I’ll take the Irish here. ND: 27—BYU:21

Seeberg: Still don’t know if either team is good, but I do think ND can wear the Cougars down over the course of 4 quarters. ND: 31—BYU: 20

THE Ohio State University Buckeyes @ Indiana Hoosiers

Draper: Indiana looks a lot like Texas has looked over the past few weeks.  They seem to be begging to be tagged after lucking into a win in Lincoln (and a bit vs the Nerds in Evanston).  The Buckeyes seem to be hitting their stride, but the loss of Ja'Kobi Jackson is huge.  While I think J.Jackson has been our best RB in my opinion this year, last week showed Bo getting back to form.  Regardless, the Hoosiers are more vulnerable through the air, and the Buckeyes are pretty good in that area.  JJ needs to feed, but don't forget about McCuin and Inniss returning to the field.  I have a feeling we'll see a Legend Bey sighting as well.  The keys for the Buckeyes will be: protect Sayin (tough with the shorthanded Oline), stop the run (feel ok in this), and force Hoover into mistakes (feel quite good here).  The Buckeyes have seemed (to us fans) mediocre on defense...but they are the #1 defense in SP+ (and #1 offense). The sacks haven't come, but they've caused problems in the backfield and will start a new streak of success for the Scarlet and Gray.  OSU: 27--IU: 17

Hoying: Kenyatta Jackson came out after the Buckeyes got rolled for 199 yards on the ground against Illinois and promised that the defense would improve. After two crushing performances against Iowa and Maryland, I think it's safe to say the Silver Bullets are back. And just in time, too, because the Hoosiers are bringing probably the best rushing attack the Buckeyes have seen and possibly will see this season. The good news is that if you can stuff the run (no "hero ball" necessary), Josh Hoover has not quite been Fernando Mendoza this season. Much like last year, I anticipate the defense putting the Buckeye offense in a position to deliver the victory. You may forget that that even with their coordinator out to lunch last year the Ohio State O moved the ball pretty efficiently in the second half until their repeated failures to get one yard when they absolutely needed it. Even with Ja'Kobi Jackson out (indefinitely?) the threat of Julian Sayin running the ball (and not in the most pitiful QB sneaks you've ever seen) should be sufficient to get just enough space to move the chains when the margins are small. Just keep #4 on the field as much as you can, no need to overthink it. I'm convinced the Buckeyes were the better team last year (nothing taken from Indiana, fully enjoy the flowers of rising to meet the moment), and I'm convinced they are this year, too, even if I don't think either team is quite as good as they were last time around. Lock in for four quarters. OSU: 24--IU: 20

Schweinfurth: I feel almost unbothered by the matchup. Maybe I see more potential in the Bucks than the Hoosiers? Indiana has escaped a few games while Ohio State has been tested and, outside of the 4th Quarter in Texas, looked the part. This is a big revenge game for the offense from the BIG Championship Game and it feels as if JJ Smith is going to go off. Not a fan of the injury report that came out Thursday, but the Bucks have enough time this week to adjust. Bucks don’t roll, but they do put this away late. OSU: 31—IU: 17

Seeberg: I hate what I’m about to do here. Unfortunately I trust IU’s O-line and defensive front 7 more than ours. Their coverage on the back end is mediocre, but Sayin actually needs time to make those throws. Sadly, I also trust Cignetti more than Day in the dreaded “Ryan Day four-quarter game” (trademark pending). Day clams up, IU clings to survival. OSU: 17—IU: 20

Upset Special
Draper: Florida over Texas
Hoying: Florida State over Miami 
Schweinfurth: MSU over Northwestern
Seeberg: Mississippi State over LSU

Week 6: Put on Your B1G Boy Pants

Standings:

1.) Schweinfurth 14-7 (0-5 upset)
2.) Draper 13-8 (1-4 upset)
2.) Seeberg 13-8 (1-4 upset)
4.) Hoying 11-10 (1-4 upset)

The usual suspects (those being Ohio State and...Indiana) still rule the Big Ten roost for the time being, but there have been a few unusual suspects trying to poke into the upper echelon and challenge for a B1G title berth. Now that we're thoroughly out of September, it's time to start separating the pretenders from the contenders.

Indiana Hoosiers @ Nebraska Cornhuskers

Draper: Honestly, we still have absolutely no idea what Indiana is.  Nebraska is the first undefeated ranked P4 team in week 6 in some time, but I don't think anyone believes in them (present company included).  Giving up 23 points in a half to Maryland is a terrifying prospect, but, to their credit, they fought back for the W.  Even though I'm not sold on IU, Cignetti and the better athletes are wearing crimson & cream.  This is a little close for comfort as Cig preps for OSU, but the Hoosier train keeps chugging along.  IU: 31--Neb: 20

Hoying: Back in 2024, this was Indiana's "we've arrived" moment as the Hoosiers stomped into dust the same Pinstripe Bowl Champion Cornhuskers that gave the Buckeyes fits in Ohio Stadium. Nebraska would sure love to flip the script this year, but their biggest problem, like every year, is that they aren't good. Sure, 5-0 is nice but they've done it against two of the worst teams in the Big Ten and three of the worst teams anywhere else. Sure, "how you win" matters as much as "who you beat", and the Huskers haven't been challenged in any of their games so far. But the one time this season that Indiana didn't look invincible was against a Northwestern team that has since turned a few heads thanks to their pasting of Penn State. Nebraska hasn't beaten anyone good in forever and I don't see their fortunes changing anytime soon. IU: 34--Neb: 13

Schweinfurth: Indiana hasn’t looked like last year, and that’s expected. Here’s the problem, Nebraska isn’t that good. The Huskers do get Indiana in a bit of a look ahead game. Not sure that it matters. Indiana wins. IU: 35—Neb: 17

Seeberg: Look, Nebraska has handled its business so far this year, arguably better than the Hoosiers (but maybe Northwestern is actually good?). IU is getting healthier at RB which may be crucial here as a balanced attack will be needed. In Lincoln this will likely be a Ryan-Day-approved “four-quarter game” (TM pending). I’m just not sure the Huskers can get enough stops over four quarters, but it should be a good one! IU: 34—Neb: 24

California Los Angeles Bruins @ Oregon Ducks

Draper: Speaking of undefeated B1G teams NO ONE is taking seriously, enter UCLA.  Based on their schedule to date, only IU has faced more cupcakes (but at least they have the Nerds on the schedule).  Bob Chesney has done a nice job overhauling the Bruins quickly, but I don't see a world that they go into Eugene and pull off a monstrous upset.  Speaking of the Ducks, has any heard what is going on with Dante Moore? I figure he should just prep for the NFL at this point, but I haven't heard anything.  Raiola looked good off the bench vs. SC, and he should be just fine here.  Quack.  UCLA: 17--Ore: 35

Hoying: Another undefeated team that's played nobody, UCLA has been turning a few heads despite Tennessee castoff Nico Iamaleava continuing to do nothing for them. On the other sideline, Oregon continues to be the one team that can stock up a healthy stable of starter-grade transfer QBs, and Dylan Raiola looked as good as or better than Dante Moore in putting away USC last week. The Bruins do tear it up on the ground though, a phase in which the Ducks haven't been the stingiest team on defense. If UCLA can make this a game of keep-away they might pull the same stunner that Oklahoma State did. I do think Oregon is vulnerable, but I like them to squeak past UCLA, setting up a nice run to the Playoff if they only have one more misstep. UCLA: 24--Ore: 27

Schweinfurth: I’ve made fun of Oregon a bit all year. They haven’t played well. Enter Dylan “Mini Mahomes” Raiola. Mini Mahomboy looked good in at USC. A backup with that amount of experience is nice luxury to have. It looks to be paying off. Raiola should be able to keep the train on the tracks until Moore comes back. UCLA: 24—Ore: 31

Seeberg: The Bruins have feasted on dregs so far this season with their conference slate opening with Purdue and Maryland (lol). The Ducks represent a sizable step up. I realize the other Coliseum team has no defense, but Raiola looked darn good. Maybe Nebraska was the problem after all? Regardless, UCLA doesn’t have the horses to hang with their former PAC foe in this one. Ducks cruise. UCLA: 20—ORE: 37

Georgia Bulldogs @ Alabama Crimson Tide

Draper: I really don't know what to expect here.  The weather will be a major factor (if they play the game...).  The Dawgs are the quiet juggernaut murdering everyone in their path without regard for human life--but their schedule has low-key sucked.  Bama on the other hand, came back against a tough UK squad and my Noles (surely you jest) and demolished a super-hot Mississippi State squad in their own backyard.  Is Bama back? I don't think I'd go that far...but this game in Bryant-Denney Stadium will certainly help.  The odds-makers don't know what to do as UGA opened as a 1.5 point favorite and the line has swung to the Tide -1.5.  I love what Keelon Russell can do with his legs, but that's when the passing game is a threat...which it shouldn't be here.  Gunner Stockton is suuuuper boring, but he's there to not make mistakes.  I think it's a classic high variance high upside team (Bama) vs. low variance team (UGA).  With crazy weather expected, I'm going to lean on boring old consistency of Georgia (which is exactly what Saban's teams were.  Kirby Smart finally takes care of the "elephant" in the room and beats his nemesis that has foiled him forever.  UGA: 17--Bama: 16

Hoying: All right, Lucy, set the football up again. Surely one of these years the Dawgs can get one over on Bama before the postseason, right? Well, a couple of weeks ago I might have agreed, but the Tide have turned over a new leaf since last year's embarrassment by national champion Indiana in the Rose Bowl (still won't ever not be weird) to be arguably the hottest team in the nation right now. Georgia is, as always, their steady, steamroller selves, but (stop me if you've heard this one), they've been getting real fat on a steady diet of cupcakes. We'll see how much impact Hurricane Post-Tropical Cyclone Isaias has on each team's gameplan, but I wouldn't count out Keelon Russell's ability to create with his feet if the pass game just isn't working for either team. Remember what CJ Stroud ended up having to do against Northwestern back in '22? UGA: 17--Bama: 20

Schweinfurth: We get a weather game! These are always fun to watch when your team isn’t involved. Georgia has had Bama’s number here lately. Low scoring defense game? Sounds like the Dogs' type of game. UGA: 12—Bama: 6

Seeberg: It sounds like a cop out, but this one will rely almost exclusively on the weather. Keelon Russell is absolutely balling out, but heavy rains and 40 MPH winds will render any passing game inert. The Bulldogs can run it, the Tide can’t. I reserve the right to change this pick if the game gets postponed or moved indoors, but I gotta go with Kirby and Co. in the slop. UGA: 21—Bama: 10

Maryland Terrapins @ THE Ohio State University Buckeyes

Draper: This game is pure: get in, don't get hurt, get the dub, we're on to Bloomington.  Don't let last week fool you...Maryland is B-A-D.  Don't be surprised if the Buckeyes hold McCuin and Innis out and the youngbloods get some play.  Don't get me wrong, JJ will put up stupid stats for the Heisman glory, but he will ideally be on the sideline much of the 2nd half.  I'm excited to see if we can get Henry and Boyd some real game action and see what they can do.  There will be a lot of running late to ice the game so might see a little more Jackson...or Jackson...or West....or maybe even Bey if he can get his head on straight.  I think I might be predicting too many points as the Buckeyes shouldn't have to do much, but whatever.  Happy Homecoming.  Mary: 10--OSU: 52 

Hoying: Apres Maryland, le deluge. We already knew the 2026 schedule was going to be an absolute gauntlet, but now even the anticipated late season breathers of Northwestern and Nebraska*** might not be such easy outs either. Of course, none of that applies to this week's matchup against the Maryland Terrapins in Ohio State's second turtle-themed game of the season. And this one should be even easier than the first, as the Terps can't really do anything well. Former promising star QB Malik Washington can't throw to his own receivers anymore, and MD gave up 54 and 48 points to UCLA and Nebraska, respectively, over the past two weeks. Ohio State has never scored fewer than 37 points against Maryland and I don't see that streak stopping this week, even if McCuin and Inniss don't play. Time to pad JJ's Heisman stats (watch out for Keelon Russell) and get some quality reps for Brock Boyd and Chris Henry to see what the future holds. Maybe we could even see a 5-wide package once everyone's healthy again! The real work starts next week. Mary: 10--OSU: 49

Schweinfurth: Maryland is Bad, M’kay. Full Stop. With that said, this is a stay healthy and play everyone game. Seriously, just get JJ his 100+ yards, 2 TDs and let Chris Henry Jr. and Brock Boyd take it home. I’d like to see one running back go for at least 100 yards here too. It would be nice to see Legend Bey again, but not sure how practice is going. Either way, Bucks win big and on to Bloomington. Mary: 7—OSU: 49

Seeberg: The calm before the storm that is the remainder of the Bucks’ schedule. The Terrapins are already on life support. 4 and 10 will pull the plug. McCuin and Inniss will hang out, watch JJ get 150 yards by half again, and hopefully Boyd and Henry can have a little coming out party. Last week the defense was encouraging, particularly in the second half. Yes Iowa doesn’t run it all that well (weird to type that honestly), but the chunks that the Hawkeyes got in the first half were all but eliminated until the game was out of hand. Would like a couple 20+ yard runs as well to get some more of those on tape. Heck, put Bey and JJ in the backfield simultaneously and watch defensive coordinator poop their Pampers. Illinois already fired their DC after playing the scarlet and gray, and there’s a non-zero chance a head coach gets the axe after this one. Bucks big. MD: 13—OSU: 52

Upset Special
Draper: Iowa State over BYU
Hoying: UCF over Oklahoma State
Schweinfurth: TAMU over Missouri
Seeberg: South Carolina over Florida

Not even picking the Red River Shootout? Cold-blooded (and deserved)

Week 5: The Scene of the Crime

Standings:

1.) Schweinfurth 12-5 (0-4 upset)
2.) Draper 11-6 (1-3 upset)
2.) Seeberg 11-6 (1-3 upset)
4.) Hoying 10-7 (1-3 upset)

Call it a theft, a murder, criminal fraud (it bought Brian Ferentz 6 more years in Iowa City), or whatever you like, there's no denying that Ohio State's last visit to Kinnick Stadium wasn't a pretty sight for Buckeye Nation. The Buckeyes will look to avenge a painful memory (at least for Ryan Day) while other top teams around the nation face hostile environments of their own.

Alabama Crimson Tide @ Mississippi State Bulldogs

Draper: Of all the games this week, this is the one I'm the most interested in.  Bama vs. MSU is supposed to be a slam dunk, but Kamario Taylor has just been a joy to watch.  The Return of the CLANGA is upon us, but Bama is pretty decent themselves.  Keelon Russell is breaking out and while Bama isn't Saban's Bama, they come to play.  This is a HUGE statement game for the Bulldogs to announce their arrival and the return to glory in Starkville...but I don't think they're ready for the big time yet.  Beating Mizzou late is one thing...but the Tide are a whole different animal.  While I'd love to go with CLANGA and the excitement, I'm going to be boring and roll with the Tide.  Bama: 31--MissSt: 20

Hoying: Do you remember the identity of the first #1 team in the history of the College Football Playoff rankings? It wasn’t Alabama. It wasn’t Ohio State. It wasn’t Clemson or Georgia or Oklahoma or any other cyanemic name you’d expect. It was Mississippi State, fresh off of 3 straight top 10 wins. Now, each of those may have been overrated (the only one who finished ranked was Auburn at 22nd), but it was the Crimson Tide who gave the Bulldogs’ dream a rude awakening on their way to the first ever CFP #1 seed. It was a close-fought match, decided by a single score, but that one was in Tuscaloosa. Now the Tide, who limped to a Playoff spot they did not deserve last year (sorry, Notre Dame), have one of the highest powered offenses in college football. But not the highest powered. That honor might just go to Mississippi State of all teams, behind the air attack of local boy Kemario Taylor and the ground game led by Fluff Bothwell (seriously). Bama took way too long out of the gate before dispatching Kentucky and Florida State, and a slow start against a high powered offense like MSU’s will doom them, especially in front of an unfavorable partisan crowd. I’d never pick against Saban in this scenario but DeBoer doesn’t seem to have the same mojo. The Bulldogs roll on for now (don’t look at the rest of their October schedule). Bama: 31—MSU: 34

Schweinfurth: I’m not sold on either of these two teams, but I do believe Bama is better. Bama: 35—MissSt: 17

Seeberg:  A win here for the surprising home team would likely be the biggest in program history since the Dak era. Bama can score in bunches, but they still don’t run it particularly well, despite their dual-threat QB Keelon Russell averaging over 5 ypc. The Bulldogs run it better, but Bama’s revamped D-line is a problem (their castoffs are not exactly crushing it in the scarlet and gray). The home crowd keeps it close, but the Tide pull away late. Bama: 38–MSU: 26

Michigan Wolverines @ Minnesota Golden Gophers

Draper: This game is very interesting after PJ Fleck got his blood sacrifice and Ferentz extracted their pound of flesh. TTUN is down after losing a game on the last play (sucks don't it) and the Gophers couldn't be more pumped after a close win in Seattle, but I don't know if Washington is any good....also, <whispers> Iowa shouldn't have won the game last week--BUT THEY DID! I will be pulling very hard for the Gophers and I would love to see the Jug return to Minneapolis, but I'm not feeling it.  TTUN gets back to cheati... winning and the bloodborne illnesses Fleck got will be for naught.  UM: 23--Minn: 13

Hoying: Maybe we’ve been a little too harsh on Michigan. Maybe they’re not as bad as their record (should) indicate. Losing to Iowa hurts, but it wasn’t like they got run out of their own building. No, that’s what happened to Minnesota against Mississippi State in week 2. The Gophers put up all of one touchdown against the Bulldogs, on a fumble in the end zone. It’s not like Iowa has much of an offense, either, last week’s close win notwithstanding, but the Hawkeyes’ defense was able to keep pace with Michigan in a way that Minnesota just will not. I’d love to be wrong again and see the Gophers ride the momentum of last week’s big win in Seattle but it’s time for more mean regression for both teams. Mich: 24—Minn: 17

Schweinfurth: Michigan is due for a bounce back. However, they have some serious problems. Pay more money for Underwood and maybe get worse results? UM: 17—Minn: 10

Seeberg:  Yet another contest where I have 0 idea if either team is good. Michigan’s supposed high-level defense gave up a 91-yard two-minute touchdown drive to IOWA last week so that defense has been, by law, confirmed as mid for the remainder of the season. Minnesota got a west coast win against the Huskies who I’m beginning to think are the Missouri Tigers of the Big Ten: always hyped and near/in the rankings, no results to show for it. Last time these two played was in the Big House, and the end-game officiating of an onside kick was so bad the conference had to change its rules afterwards. The Gophers likely want revenge, but sadly I think the maize and blue will eke out enough points to win another hard-to-watch contest. UM: 20—Minn: 16

Florida Gators @ Missouri Tigers

Draper: If this were an NFL game, bet the house on the Tigers.  Florida couldn't be higher after a beatdown over the Rebels and Mizzou is just (somehow) still ranked after losing to CLANGA (SEC).  It SCREAMS upset as the Gators get to comfortable and travel to sleepy Columbia.  However, I don't think Missouri is any good.  While Florida is probably a touch overrated at the moment, their QB has flashed and there appears to be life in Gainesville (Lord, I've seen what you've given them and I ask for the same for my Noles).  Gators win this one in a tight game early but a comfortable win down the stretch. UF: 31--Mizzou: 20
Hoying: Speaking of high-powered SEC offenses, how about the new-look Florida Gators? It’s a shame they don’t play either of the teams discussed above (though they do visit Texas, who has to play everyone this year); what a track meet those would turn out to be. As it stands, this week’s questionably ranked opponent is Missouri, who never beats anyone of note and may never again (unless Ohio State’s starting quarterback opts out of another bowl game). And the latest reports are that both starting DEs for the Tigers are out on Saturday. Oh boy. The Gators keep rolling, and with only tough games against Texas and Georgia left we may be looking at one of the first teams to lock up a playoff bid. UF: 38—Mizzou: 24

Schweinfurth: Again, Florida just feels like the better team here. Mizzou was good a few years ago, but they’ve probably capped out. UF: 34—Mizzou: 21

Seeberg:  If you don’t follow the college football twitter-sphere, you may be unaware that Mizzou is 0-16 against SEC opponents that finish above .500. One’s an accident, two’s a pattern, three’s a trend, sixteen is bordering on unequivocal. Please get this middling team out of the rankings. Thanks Gators. UF: 34—Mizzou: 24

THE Ohio State University Buckeyes @ Iowa Hawkeyes

Draper: The scary pink locker room at Kinnick has caused some terrifying games in the past for Buckeye faithful.  The good news? None of these players were a part of that...nor were the coaches.  Urban smashed in big games but was always good for an inexplicable bedcrapping once a year and it was in Iowa City in 2017 (the last time OSU played there).  I've had the good fortune to witness a game in Iowa City when Gameday was there in 2006 when OSU took care of business (38-17---NBD).  Honestly, I think this is more like the 2006 game.  Iowa simply doesn't have the horses to compete here. How did they go into the Big House and win? Clutch QB play, great TE play (welcome to Iowa), punts galore, supremely overrated scUM team, and a LOT of luck.  The advanced stats said Iowa had no business being close in that game (...and yet...).  Yes, Iowa generally gets that magical win at least once a year, but Jeremiah Smith provides all the magic we need.  I'm curious as to how the defense rebound from last week (even though most of the Illini points were simply good offense).  In addition, we need to start asking the question about Jakobi vs. Bo AND the other receivers need to start stepping up.  I'd love to see some more Brock Boyd peppered in as the season progresses.  Regardless, I think the Bucks win comfortably, but there are a few moments of panic early.  Low scoring but just keep winning.  OSU: 28--Iowa: 10
Hoying: The 2017 Iowa game may be the strangest Ohio State loss of the last 15 years. Yeah, 2018 Purdue and 2024 Michigan were equally bad, but at least they had key favorable matchups to exploit. Iowa had…tight ends…and the uncanny ability to read JT all day. 55 points was the most a Brian Ferentz Hawkeye offense scored against a team that finished with more than 4 wins, and they did it against perhaps Urban’s most underrated team. Thankfully, these lapses by the scarlet and gray are becoming rarer and rarer (no, losing on the road to the #4 team by one point doesn’t count). The Buckeye offense was firing on all cylinders against Illinois, including the best O-line play all season and some encouraging runs by the boy behind center. The run defense didn’t look great, but the Hawkeyes are shockingly bad at running the ball, even compared against Ohio State’s relatively quiet ground game. The Hawkeye blueprint for victory was the same against Iowa State and Michigan: hang around until the fourth quarter and them snakebite them when they make a late mistake. The Buckeyes should not leave this one to chance; apply pressure all 4 quarters and finish the job with the lead this time. Late defensive meltdowns continue to be a concern but I don’t think that Iowa has the horses to make Ohio State pay in the same way that Texas did. On to the rest of the October gauntlet (although maybe we should just call it the rest-of-the-season gauntlet; did you see what Northwestern did to Penn State???). OSU: 31—Iowa: 13

Schweinfurth: Iowa is a pain in the neck. They have no receivers, play a million tight ends, and only run it. AND IT WORKS! I don’t expect a repeat of last week. The defense was challenged by the players themselves to have better run fits. I’m sure it was a point of emphasis this week. Bucks should win and the Iowa run game won’t get over 200 yards. OSU: 38—Iowa 16

Seeberg:  To his credit, Ryan Day doesn’t lose to teams he should beat. To his discredit, he’s 6-8 in one-score games (read: “four-quarter games” *shudders*. The spread on this one has actually gone up to 14.5 after starting at 13.5. Anything over 8 points works for the Buckeyes in their icy white unis (with the shoulder stripes!!). Kenyatta says the defense is “fixed” after too many people missed assignments last week playing “hero ball”. If one film session really fixed that, Matt Patricia might be a wizard. Giving up 450 yards to Illinois is concerning to say the least. Regardless, not one, but TWO of Michigan’s WRs had 100 yard days against the Hawkeyes, and JJ is worth about 3.8 UM wideouts. Please lord, don’t let it come down to special teams. 15 targets for Jeremiah, just enough run game to keep them honest, and get the *bleep* out of Dodge. OSU: 31—Iowa: 20

Upset Special
Draper: Rutgers over Indiana
Hoying: Clemson over Miami
Schweinfurth: Auburn over Tennessee
Seeberg: UCF over Houston

Week 4: Turtley Enough for the Turtle Club

Standings:

1.) Draper 9-3 (0-3 upset)
2.) Seeberg 8-4 (1-2 upset)
2.) Hoying 8-4 (0-3 upset)
4.) Schweinfurth 7-5 (0-3 upset)

After a sleepy nonconference slate, the big games begin in earnest with a full schedule of ranked matchups across America's two top leagues.

Texas Longhorns @ Tennessee Volunteers

Draper:  Is Texas back? They’ve looked pretty pedestrian for 8 of the 12 quarters they’ve played this year (no one cares about Texas St.). The Vols looked solid, but it is still Tennessee.  They’re usually good for one big win a year, and this is clearly the moment (if it happens).  The Texas defense led by Colin Simmons is quite stout, but this will be a true road test (only one until November—seriously, Texas plays ONE road game before November!). I know next to nothing about the Vols, but this feels like it might be the one shot, one opportunity type game.  I don’t think Texas is unbeatable, and Arch was shaky enough at home.  Why not? Rocky Top steals a huge win on the back of turnovers before absolutely faceplanting down the stretch (as is tradition).  Tex: 23—Tenn: 24

Hoying: I have a sneaking suspicion that Texas is a bit overrated at #1. Sure, they have the season’s signature win so far, but they looked really bad for long stretches of that game. Then again, while the Horns are visiting a hostile environment, it’s not like they’re rolling into Columbus to play the Buckeyes again. After 2024’s miracle Playoff run (that ended in disaster), the Vols put up a pathetic 8-5 showing last year, culminating with a loss to Illinois. Texas’s schedule provides plenty of chances for a faceplant but I don’t expect the elder UT to provide much more than a speed bump. Tex: 27—Tenn: 20

Schweinfurth: Everyone is making a big deal about the noise at Neyland. Yes, it is a loud stadium, but you actually have to have a team to back it up. I do think Texas is a very good team. They played well against the Bucks, and it probably looks worse for the Bucks without the crazy bounces. I’m not sold on Tennessee. Win this and I’ll buy in, but the Horns win. Tex: 27—Tenn: 24

Seeberg: Lots of orange here on Saturday, but enough about the dignitaries. I do think Heupel has gotten the Vols back to respectable heights. That “next step” that was supposed to happen in the playoffs a couple years ago turned out to be a boot to the throat from our beloved Buckeyes. This year’s iteration on good old Rocky Top (woo) has a solid offense, as usual, but the defense gives up too many yards between the 20s. Arch showed his newfound red zone prowess against the Bucks and there’s no reason to believe Tennessee will be a stiffer defensive test. Burnt orange > highlighter orange (but those dark grays with that orange do look sweet). The real UT prevails. UT: 34—Tenn: 20

Iowa Hawkeyes @ Michigan Wolverines

Draper: TTUN was 1 second* from losing in week 1, looked competent in week 2 vs OU (but that was certainly exposing Mateer), and struggled for a half against UTEP before blowing them out.  Iowa, on the other hand, has been steady old Iowa—blowing out the little sisters of the poor and squeaking by Iowa State.  I have no idea which version of these teams will show up.  I would be all in on Iowa to “Iowa” their way to a victory in the Big House, but the week 2 win over the Clones is concerning. I feel like this is going to be a super boring game in which one big play makes the difference.  The UM defense is quite good, and I feel like there’s enough explosive plays to keep scUM undefeated.  Iowa: 13—UM: 17
Hoying: I'm not one of the people that wants UM to come into Ohio Stadium undefeated. Sure, 2006 was nice, but I'd rather see Michigan ground into dust by the end of October than waiting to ruin their season late (and in the 12 or 24 team Playoff era, one devastating loss isn't enough anyway). So I'm always happy to see the opportunity for Michigan to lose. But Iowa has played one team with a pulse this year, and it took two 4th quarter field goals (i.e., the "Hawkeye Special") for them to overcome their in-state rivals. The Wolverines are finding...something...working with Bryce Underwood at QB, and the defense has been solid all season long. I don't see them losing until they have to face a high powered offense (one that won't play Michigan's game). Iowa: 9--UM: 17

Schweinfurth: Iowa is a better version of Western Michigan. Control the ball, play good defense. Oklahoma isn’t great and the Wolverines took advantage. I am not sold on Michigan, and I probably won’t until Underwood can actually read a defense. Iowa wins in a rock fight. Iowa: 14—UM: 9

Seeberg:  This game has a very similar feel to UM’s surprising win over the Sooners, with one glaring difference. See if you can spot it. It’s in Ann Arbor. Iowa has an excellent, disciplined defense (see: Venables/OU). Iowa has a mediocre offense (see: OU/Mateer). Iowa takes care of the ball on offense (see: literally anyone other than Mateer). No short fields is a problem for the winged helmets. Wonder if Sherrone can watch this L on probation? Iowa: 19—UM: 13

Mississippi Rebels @ Florida Gators

Draper: Welcome to the new expectations, Rebels.  Can Trinidad and Co. keep it rolling on the road? The Gators aren’t your Steve Spurrier/Urban Meyer Gators, but they do seem to be more competent than in years past.  The Swamp (when Gator Nation believes) is the toughest place in the country to play and I expect them to show out. The Rebels are absolutely the better team, but the environment on top of the return to Earth after the Lane Train makes this interesting.  I still lean Rebels, but I won’t be shocked if UF snags a huge home win.  Miss: 31—UF: 27
Hoying: Well I wasn't expecting THAT on the plains last week. The same Auburn team that struggled their way to 17 points against Baylor managed to rack up 39 against Florida. Good on Florida for outscoring them, but Lane Kiffin's fingerprints are still all over this Rebel offense that's put up 73 points in 2 ranked games so far. You're going to need to play defense to beat them and the Gators still aren't there yet under first year coach Jon Sumrall. I'll believe Florida is back when I see it. Miss: 38--UF: 27

Schweinfurth: That was such an emotional game last week for the Rebels. So much so, that I don’t know if they’ll be able to crank it back up this week. This one’s in the Swamp and not a fun place to play. This Florida team is better, but not great. I just think the emotional drop last week does the Rebs in. Miss: 28—UF: 35

Seeberg: Ah yes, the infamous “let’s get an SEC team into the 20s for another ranked vs ranked conference matchup!” Game, volume 1 of 2 this weekend alone. Barf. Then again, Florida is favored in this one? Why?? For allowing 39 points to an Auburn team that managed 17 against Baylor? I know Vegas knows infinitely more than I ever will, but I just don’t see it here. The Gators won’t get enough stops over four quarters. Miss: 34—UF: 24

Oregon Ducks @ Southern California Trojans

Draper: What are these teams? Oregon was the preseason darling, but faceplanting in Stillwater was a mystery (on top of their mediocre play in general –outside of Portland St.).  USC had tons of hope, but the defense has been the usual Lincoln Riley experience (Buttgers had them on the ropes for God’s sake).  This will be a litmus test for both teams. The winner is still alive in the playoff run, but the loser is in big, big, big trouble. A 2^nd loss for the Ducks is devastating with their schedule and a loss for the Trojans just feels like “same ol’ same ol’”.  If the Coliseum was a tough place to play, I’d think the Trojans would carry the day, but the way SC has limped through the season has me reverting to priors.  Give me the Ducks in a squeaker.  Ore: 31—USC: 30
Hoying: I was a bit surprised in the preseason when Oregon wasn't crowned under the "this year it's their turn" logic that astroturfed Penn State last season. Perhaps the conventional wisdom has grown a little wiser. Anyway, if you thought Florida's defense was bad, look away from the Ducks. Boise State got a few lucky bounces to stay with Oregon down the stretch but the Ducks got completely run through by Oklahoma State a week later. Beating Portland State 84-0 puts a nice number on the page but doesn't do much to assuage concerns that Oregon may be spiraling this season. A week ago I'd have believed USC was well primed to knock the Ducks off their perch (do Ducks perch?) until they struggled way too hard against bad bad Rutgers. We'll charitably call it a look-ahead game rather than sound the alarm on another lackluster USC defense. Then again, they couldn't really stop Louisiana the week before either...I don't know what to do with this one. The Oregon home field advantage has been as good as any team's during the Dan Lanning era, but they won't have it on their side this Saturday night. USC throws the first wrench into the anticipated Big Ten order this fall. Ore: 30--USC: 34

Schweinfurth: I have been laughing at the Ducks all season so far. They haven’t been out of a game, but they have looked like straight trash. USC isn’t exactly a world beater, but Oregon likes to keep in interesting. Lanning’s squad should bounce back here, but it comes down to the last drive again. Ore: 42—USC: 38

Seeberg: I know it’s early in the season so confusion is still rampant, but boy do I have NO idea what to make of this game. USC has looked good(?) so far but struggled, albeit literally ALL the way across the country, to put away Rutgers. Meanwhile, Dan Lanning’s regularly scheduled collapse was fast forwarded by three full months, inexplicably losing to a different OSU. Does Lincoln finally get a quasi-statement win in LA? Mestemaker is pretty mobile, seems to give the Ducks problems, and Maiava is definitely a notch better. I’m torn between overreacting to the Ducks’ loss and not being too stubborn to pick who we all thought was the better team in August. Regardless, expect a lot of points.  Heck with it. Odyssey was a hit. Go Trojans. Ore: 31—USC: 41

Illinois Fighting Illini @ THE Ohio State University Buckeyes

Draper: Ah, everyone’s favorite rivalry that no one cares about. There were hopes in the preseason that the Illini would take a step forward….but alas, no.  Bielema’s squad has been super uninspiring.  There’s not really any aspect of the game in which I expect the Illini to take charge.  However, as we all know, Columbus is a mess and everything Buckeye football is DISASTROUS! They LOST a game! Kent State was only a 56 point win! Time to prep for next year…. Now, obviously, I am on Team R-E-L-A-X, BUT…there are some things that need cleaning up.  The short yardage failures from last year and this year thus far MUST improve.  Also, Sayin’s blindness in the middle of the field is infuriating (speaking as the person in C-deck last week screaming about how open Inniss was on 3^rd down in the middle of the endzone).  These are not the endtimes, but there is plenty of room for improvement.  Things I want to see: defense needs to dial up a little more pressure (more Pettijohn and Wilder please), Sayin needs to take some shots when open (to people other than 4—especially in the middle of the field), and the offensive line needs to man up and push people off the ball (especially in short yardage gotta have it situations).  It won’t be fixed in our first B1G match, but we need to see some positive movement.  Bucks roll, but let’s continue to get better.  Ill: 10—OSU: 48
Hoying: I try to look for the positives when watching Buckeye football. The team never plays any better in response to my criticism so I might as well enjoy what I'm seeing either way until the ref puts a phantom second back on the clock the clock hits zero. But despite walloping Kent State by 56 points, with the best per-play domination of any team playing last weekend, I didn't feel good watching it. The defense played well and broke out a few new wrinkles (keep Pettijohn on the field!) but the offense continued to struggle in short yardage situations to the tune of 1 third down conversion in 8 attempts, and two blown fourth downs. Sooner or later this team's going to need to get a yard when it really matters, and we haven't been able to do that consistently in the last 4 years with the exception of the magical 2024 Playoff run. The good news for now is that Illinois appears to have taken a significant step backward since last season. Other than star wideout (and Ohio native) Collin Dixon, the Illini don't have a ton of weapons. Last year Illinois wasn't able to get much of anything going until going up-tempo toward the end of the game, leaving Bret Bielema to lament not using tempo from the start. If he comes out guns blazing on Saturday, we could see an interesting clash of styles from Ohio State's, shall we say, more measured approach. But the Buckeyes can't afford to waste too many possessions, because they're heading to Kinnick next week for their first visit since Brian Ferentz's finest offensive performance. October is going to make or break this season, and the Bucks need to fix their problems. Now. Ill: 14--OSU: 38

Schweinfurth: I watched the Bucks game last week after hearing all the negative things. Yes there were issues on third and fourth down. However, I think Day has their attention. I won’t be surprised if Jacoby gets more RB snaps than Bo in this one. He just seems to run harder. I’d like to see more of Legend Bey and Chris Henry Jr. One of those guys needs to step up. The defense has been fine and only gave up points in super garbage time. Illinois will have their hands full. The turtle stays in Columbus. Ill: 7—OSU: 38

Seeberg: Amazing part about this game? Illinois lost to Duke, which is a quality loss, and it’s not even basketball season! Bert has Illinois up to basically "Wisconsin lite" standards after the debacle that was the last decade or so in Champaign. Obviously we need to see a better run game from our scarlet and gray and for the love of all that is good in the world can we get the TEs off the field please? They can’t catch or block this season. Spread-to-run and zone blocking should be the new marching orders. Oh, and 4. Lots of 4. To their credit, the Bucks have largely avoided sleepy starts this season that plagued the last couple of years, hope that continues as well. Ho hum 3-score W. Ill: 13—OSU: 31

Upset Special
Draper: Wake over Louisville
Hoying: Wisconsin over Penn State
Schweinfurth: USC over Bama
Seeberg: Iowa State over Utah

Week 3: Scrubbing the Sheets

Standings:

1.) Draper 5-3 (0-2 upset)
1.) Hoying 5-3 (0-2 upset)
1.) Schweinfurth 5-3 (0-2 upset)
1.) Seeberg 5-3 (0-2 upset)

Buck up, Buckeye Nation. The last time Ohio State dropped game 2 against a big-name opponent, coming off a disappointing season-ending two game slide, wonderful things followed.

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18

Houston Cougars @ Texas Tech Red Raiders

Draper: Big 12 opens with a bang with ...Houston @Texas Tech....oh boy.  The Red Raiders looked to enter the season as the villains of CFB due to Soresby until Lane and TTUN asked them politely to 'hold my beer'.  Now, the Raiders have been somewhat of an after thought. I'm intrigued with Connor Weigman at Houston, but I'm not sure they have what it takes to storm into Lubbock at night and steal a win.  We know very little about these teams as the transfer portals are in full swing, but I like the home team to prevail in a tight conference opener.  Hou: 20--TT: 24
Hoying: How often do you get to do a common opponent analysis as early as week 3? Houston kicked off the season handling Oregon State with relative ease before Texas Tech escaped Corvallis with a 4th quarter comeback. The Tech offense has been in a bit of a stall to start the season, and they don't quite seem to have last year's punishing D-line to support them this year. Houston has been doing work on the ground this season, including good efforts by Texas A&M cast-off QB Connor Weigman (who is just a bit more mobile than his counterpart Will Hammond). This game should tell us a lot about whether last year's surprise 13-0 start by Texas Tech is a flash in the pan or a true new sustainable dynasty like Indiana (still won't ever not be weird). I don't think their defense is good enough this year to make it happen. Hou: 24--TTU: 20

Schweinfurth: I have only read a little bit about these teams. Both are not on my radar right now. A win here could put them back there, but I really don't know much. My gut says Houston, so let's go there. Hou: 28--TTU: 24

Seeberg: I realize it’s only week 3 and there are myriad questions about almost every team in the sport. That said, I genuinely have 0 idea if either of these teams is any good. Remarkably, they already have a common opponent, and both looked… meh(?) against the westernmost OSU, ultimately winning by two scores each. I expected the Red Raiders to be a little better on defense so far. That said, when it feels like a coin flip, go with the home team. UH: 20—TTU: 27

SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 19

Louisiana State Tigers @ Mississippi Rebels

Draper: I don't know how the game is going to go here...but it's going to be an ugly ugly scene in Oxford.  We saw the famous mustard bottles rain in Tennessee, but this seems far more dangerous for the visitors.  LSU absolutely rocked Clemson in week 1 but showed a few chinks in week 2 with the 'doubtful' Sam Leavitt.  Ole Miss is road tested against a good Louisville team (shoutout Lincoln Kienholz) but this is all about the narrative.  Honestly, LSU likely has the personnel edge, but the Grove will be a madhouse.  The bad blood isn't only with the fans, but also the players.  Their coach bailed on them as they went ham to make the semifinals.  The environment is going to be too much for LSU to handle (and I expect Lane might have to be escorted out before the game ends).  Ole Miss needs a few turnovers to help a weaker defense, but the crowd should provide.  Give me the Rebs.  Miss: 30--LSU: 28
Hoying: Well, we got to see LSU desecrate the desiccated husk of Clemson to open the season; can they match their performance on the road? A good rule of thumb back when old Lane was at Ole Miss was to fade the Rebs on any big road games. And now they're entering the hornets' nest; I don't even think the fans in Columbus this Thanksgiving weekend will be as angry as the Ole Miss faithful this Saturday night. And behind the arm of Trinidad Chambliss, the Rebels may have just enough firepower to do something about it. Losing key defensive pieces like Prince Umanmielen to LSU won't help, but Pete Golding didn't sit idly by while Lane looted the store on the way out; Ole Miss brought in one of the nation's top transfer classes themselves. Between the shoulder chip factor and LSU QB Sam Leavitt's (nonexistent?) mystery injury, I think the student gets one over on the master to start the rivalry. Miss: 31--LSU: 30

Schweinfurth: I get there is a lot of hatred for Lane in this one. However, this dude left the cupboard bare. He didn't just take coaches, but players and staff too. I honestly don't think Ole Miss has the talent to hang here. Do I want Lane to get his ass beat? Yes. Will it happen here? No. Miss: 17--LSU: 35

Seeberg: Lane Bowl I. Has a lot more intrigue than the egg bowl these days anyway. I saw a post on social media about Kiffin that I’ll paraphrase: Lane belongs in a rare category of people that are extremely dislikable yet also objectively funny. Spot on. In any case, Lane’s newest team put belt to behind against Clemson on both sides of the ball. The Rebels can still score it, but giving up 38 to first-time starter Lincoln Kienholz and Louisville is a problem- and it will bite them this time. Tigers pull away in the second half. MISS: 27—LSU: 38

Southern Methodist Mustangs @ Louisville Cardinals

Draper: SMU has a nice road win against FSU but the Noles have been on a nasty downward spiral for years.  The Cardinals, on the the hand, lost a close one to the aforementioned Rebels, but looked really good behind former Buckeye Lincoln Kienholz.  Papa Johns Stadium (is it still called that?) was going crazy and should show out for this one.  The Mustangs looked pretty lackluster in Doak and only won due to ineptitude on the other side of the ball.  I like Brohm's Cardinals to get a solid win to take control of 2nd place in the ACC pecking order.  SMU: 20--UL:31
Hoying: Of course, if I'm going to give Ole Miss so much credit, I can't very well dump on the team that pressed them 'til the buzzer in Oxford. Lincoln Kienholz has been one of the surprises of the young season, making a strong push for September Heisman, but he's got nothing on SMU spitfire Kevin Jennings, who heads up the nation's most formidable passing attack. You saw him squeak out a win against Florida State (who might just be horrible again) but he's going to have a score a bit more to keep pace with Louisville. That being said, if you can contain Kienholz, you can constrain the Cardinal attack. But SMU ain't 2023 Missouri. SMU: 24--UL: 31

Schweinfurth: I watched a bit of SMU and they were okay. I haven't set eyes on Louisville, but heard some good things. Not sure how much defense will be played here. My guess is the last team to have the ball wins. SMU: 35--UL: 38

Seeberg: Speaking of Lincoln, he gets another shot at a ranked team this weekend, this time at home against a less-formidable foe. Neither team runs it well, but Kienholz (the leading rusher of BOTH teams in this matchup) has legit dual-threat ability that will give the Mustangs fits. Chalk up another L for a bunch of horses in Kentucky. SMU: 20—UL: 31

Kent State Golden Flashes @ THE Ohio State University Buckeyes

Draper: Time to get right.  Buckeye Nation needs to R-E-L-A-X.  Last Saturday sucked....it may have even sucked worse than anything has sucked before, but most fans would have said a 1-point loss was understandable before the game.  It doesn't make it right, but the sky isn't falling.  This will be a very telling game as we get to see how Buckeyes decide the future of this squad.  I expect Day and Co. will have their heads on straight and focused on the future.  The new world of big boy CFB isn't undefeated seasons.  It's more like the NFL model in which you test, you improve, then let er rip in the playoffs.  Last year, everyone bemoaned the lack of adversity leading to some complacent losses at the end of the year...well? Here we go.  The Flashes have always sucked and they will continue to do so.  I think we're going to see more creativity in the distribution of the rock and the line will play much better (a lot easier without Colin Simmons.  Things to look for: Sayin calming down and staying in rhythm (unlike the 2nd half), consistent use of JJ (but not forcing the ball to him in triple coverage), better run blocking to improve the worst case runs (make sure we have 3 yards at worst...not -2), some defensive line pressure (needs to get more consistent outside of Kenyatta--hello, Wilder), better discipline in the LBs (let's see a little more Pettijohn as he had a nice game), and avoiding getting burnt like toast (only to turn into the craziest INT ever by McClain).  I trust the coaches.  Shutout time.  Kent: 0--OSU: 56

Hoying: A scant two weeks ago I asked a few prophetic questions about the 2026 Ohio State experience. How will the ball be distributed among the WR corps without a clear #2 option? How will the O-line make room for the running game, and does that include our newly minted captain QB? How many pieces in the secondary does it take to replace Caleb Downs, and what does that mean for getting pressure on the QB? I wasn't satisfied with the answers I got from the Ball State game, and the Bucks' deficiencies in all 3 cost them a very winnable game against Texas. Fortunately, this weekend's game against Kent State is the first in a couple of "get-right" games before making a trip to Iowa City. Maybe we need to see more Brock Boyd and Legend Bey on offense, and more Khary Wilder and Riley Pettijean on defense. Maybe we need to pull our tight ends off the field if they can't block outside zone worth a damn. Maybe...we need to pump the brakes on Connor Hawkins, he drilled his 48-yarder before gacking the potential game-sealer. It's tempting to write off any answers we get against the Golden Flashes as fool's gold, but I at least expect to see some unfamiliar looks this week, as Day likes to tinker when he has the cushion to do so. At any rate, I trust the coaches to have a better sense of what's happening on the field than the average fan (mostly because the average fan is only interested in RUNNING THE TOUCHDOWN PLAY). For now, just enjoy the free win. Kent: 0--OSU: 45

Schweinfurth: I took away several things from that debacle last week. This Ohio State team is pretty good, just inexperienced in a few places. Also, Ryan Day hasn't learned from the past. Ultimately, that loss doesn't mean much. I think I had this team pegged around 10-2 heading into the playoffs. It's time to get mad and take it out on poor, defenseless Kent State. This one gets ugly early. How about bombs to Smith, big runs from Bo and Legend and a good defensive performance. It would be nice to get consistent pressure. Get out of this one healthy again and on to B1G play. Kent: 3--OSU: 49

Seeberg: Well here we are again, glorified scrimmage number two, sandwiching an inexplicable loss. Except it wasn’t. It followed an annoyingly predictable pattern. If you’re going to slow a game down and sit on leads, you at least have to have a good kicking game. Can we hire Tressel as a consultant who only recruits kickers and punters? Defensively, I need to see some aggression in this one. I appreciate the discipline of this squad- all of the Longhorns’ scoring drives needed a ton of plays- but the red zone magic is gone with all the losses to the NFL. Patricia needs to dial some things up and risk a big play or two (just not to Jim Knowles levels hopefully). On offense, I just need to see if Julian is actually aware that it’s legal to throw the ball between the hashes. Some chunk run plays would be nice too. And tempo maybe? The 2-minute drill last week may have been the best the offense has looked since 2024 against a real opponent. Get out fast, stay healthy, and get JJ the first of his all-time records. Kent: 10—OSU: 55 

Upset Special
Draper: WKU over IU
Hoying: Colorado State over BYU
Schweinfurth: FSU over Bama
Seeberg: West Virginia over Virginia