Thursday, September 23, 2010

Picks Week 4... Put up or shut up

Alabama Crimson Tide vs. Arkansas Razorbacks

Gomer: As nice as it would be for the Razorbacks to pull the upset, the rushing attack of Alabama just is too much for Arkansas. Mark Ingram will re-assert himself onto the Heisman watch list and make everyone start to fear for Archie Griffin's ability to retain the ability to be the only player with 2 Heisman trophies. Bama: 34 -- Ark: 20

Chief: This very well may be the the Tide's toughest test in the regular season. They invade Fayetteville with the Razorbacks having dreams of upsets. I love the big armed (UM trasfer) Ryan Mallet and he has certainly looked good this year with one of the strongest arms since Mr. Purple Drank Jamarcus Russell. With that being said, I just don't see it. Bama is just too stacked on offense (McElroy, Ingram, Richardson, Jones, etc.) and their defense just reloads under Saban. I don't even know if the Hogs can keep it close. Bama: 27--Ark: 13

Stanford Cardinal vs. Notre Dame Fightin' Irish

Gomer: It should take a small miracle for ND Coach Brian Kelly to not start the season 1-3 and most of us in Ohio wouldn't mind seeing that. The Cardinal are a very well rounded team who are going to take a mammoth effort to knock off, even on the road. Don't expect Stanford to lose it now... Stan: 28 -- ND: 20

Chief: After getting punched in the gut last week by the OT loss to MSU, the Irish have to take on a very balanced Cardinal team (My preseason predicted Pac 10 Champ). Stanford is led by do-it-all QB Andrew Luck who has been phenomenal in every game thus far and looks to be the number 1 pick in the 2011 NFL draft (if it happens). The Irish have a very nice receiving corps, but very little else. A young QB and questionable defense is just not enough for the Irish. Stan: 31--ND: 17

Oregon State vs. Boise State

Gomer: Blue turf, schmu turf. The Beavers will have a tough chance at coming away with a win in Boise regardless of what the Beavers prepare for. Frankly, this game shouldn't be good as the Broncos and ESPN would hope for, but should be entertaining regardless. OSU: 16 -- BSU: 37

Chief: Oh boy...another 'marquee' game on the blue turf. I'll give you the Ducks last year Boise, because they were actually good. The Beavers have 2 good players (the Rodgers's) but that's it. This game will most likely be a colossal disappointment. Oregon St. won last week over Louisville (bad)...at home...by 7. Boise is a solid top 10 team (not a National Title team) and should make easy work of the Beavers before entering High School (WAC) season. The Broncos will run it up as much as possible (and get way too much credit). OSU: 20--BSU: 48

West Virginia Mountaineers vs. Louisiana State Tigers

Gomer: The Tigers may have a tough time against the speedy WVU 'neers but frankly, LSU shouldn't have a problem. This game will be interesting for sure but LSU's running game will help the Tigers prevail in this matchup, WVU: 20 -- LSU: 35

Chief: West Virginia has certainly surprised me this year, but I'm still not sold, especially not in Death Valley. Bill Stewart is massively overrated (by that, I mean, I'm surprised he's employed). LSU is not great, but Jefferson and 'The Hat' should make quick work of the Big East 'power'. Death Valley is never fun for opposing schools. WVU: 10--LSU: 20

South Carolina Gamecocks vs. Auburn Tigers

Gomer: Somehow, someway the Gamecocks offense is gonna find a way to be productive. I don't know how, but a team as flakey as the 'Cocks aren't gonna let this one get away. I thought that Clemson would upset the Tigers at home, but no such luck. Auburn's inconsistency will catch up with them today. SC: 29 -- Aub: 23

Chief: This is a pretty nice game for this week. A very underrated SEC matchup should be a slobberknocker. Auburn showed last week that they hit extremely hard and pulled off the win over Clemson (mediocre ACC team)....at home...in OT...by a missed kick. Auburn is a decent team and the home field is a HUGE advantage, but I really like what I've seen out of South Carolina this year. Spurrier's defense has been surprisingly good like last year and the offense is getting better and better. Go Cocks for the SEC road upset after all the injuries/bruises for Auburn last week. SC: 13--Aub: 10

Eastern Michigan Eagles vs. Ohio State Buckeyes

Gomer: Only the worst team in D-I over the last 3 seasons... if the Buckeyes struggle for a few minutes, don't be surprised. The Buckeyes should have no problems shooting down the Eagles and making a mockery of ESPN on ABC at 3:30pm. There is no reason for this game to even be worth watching other than taking stock of what's going on prior to Big Ten season. EMU: 6 -- OSU 48

Chief: This one...is going to be ugly. EMU hasn't won since the Reagan administration (give or take) and the Buckeyes are chugging along. Why is this on ABC? Ohio State should have Pryor and the starters out of pads by halftime. Very important for the Buckeyes to establish a running game and NOT SUCK ON SPECIAL TEAMS!!! Other than that, this is a glorified scrimmage. Should be a similar view for Ron English (EMU head coach and former Wolverine's defensive coordinator); being blown off the field by the Scarlet and Gray! EMU: 0 (calling it)--OSU: 51

Other Games to pick
Oklahoma vs. Cincinnati: Gomer: OU Chief: OU
Temple vs. Penn State: Gomer: PSU Chief: Temple
Austin Peay vs. Wisconsin: Gomer: Wisconsin Chief: Let's Go Peay!! (I pick UW)
Ball State vs. Iowa: Gomer: Iowa Chief: Iowa
Bowling Green vs. Michigan: Gomer: UM Chief: UM
Northern Colorado vs. Michigan State: Gomer: MSU Chief: MSU

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

5 Things We've Learned--Week 3

A few more interesting games than expected this week. Nothing ground-breaking this week, but I'll do my best.

1) There is a MAJOR lack of parity this year
Let's face it, there are 2 (maybe 3) good teams this year. Ohio State and Alabama are WAY ahead of the pack and to be honest, it will be a surprise if these 2 don't meet up in Glendale. Boise is trying their best, but with the schedule, there's absolutely NO way they just into the top two without some help (and that might mean 2 losses from the top). TCU is fine as well, but schedule is a problem there as well. With the Hawkeyes and Gators showing major chinks, the Bucks and Tide should cruise. Oregon and Texas could very well go undefeated as well(doubtful), but it just won't matter unless the preseason favorites keep winning.
Also, speaking of Boise, did you really need to throw that flea-flicker in on the 2nd possession against Wyoming? It's Wyoming. That's like OSU running a fumble-rooskie against EMU next week. I get it Boise, you need the limelight and no one believes you're deserving. Let me let you in on a little secret, you could win the rest of your games by seventy bajillion points and you won't sniff Glendale (for the Championship anyway) if Bama and OSU are undefeated. If you want to be one of the big boys, win it in a big boy way. No need to resort to tricks to show you can fool a middle/lower level Mtn West team. Boise looked like they could complete with VT but then again, so could JMU. Unfortunate, yes, but it is what it is. Joining the Mtn West is a good step, but you'll never reach the big time in a midmajor conference...and you'll never get into a major conference without improving other sports and, more importantly, your academics. Good luck against a middle of the road Oregon State...it's your last college opponent this year.

2) ESPN is relentlessly pushing their agenda
The SEC contract with ESPN is an absolute goldmine in more than just TV money. So far, College Gameday has been to 3 SEC games in 3 weeks. Week 1 was a big game and probably the best site so no complaints. Week 2, the UM-OSU rematch of the 2002 championship was bigger and had higher ranked opponents (PSU=bad) but Bama was 1 so whatever. Week 3, Auburn/Clemson? Really? Yeah, it went to overtime and was hard-hitting but the Iowa/Arizona game was bigger AND the teams were better AND it provided a nice spread of the country with a Pac 10/Big Ten matchup AND it was just as good of a game. The SEC gets the nod again because of the money ESPN has invested.
The SEC doesn't just reap the TV spotlight, it also gets a major PR boost. Again, everyone looks to the Worldwise Leader for their sports info so when Sportscenter says the SEC is leaps and bounds better than the rest, everyone believes it, including the AP voters, Harris voters, and coaches. This significantly skews the polls and therefore the shots at the national championship. Not only does ESPN push for the SEC, it also pushes the agenda of a college football playoff (which just isn't coming). Boise is put forward as the shunned 'little engine that could' that doesn't get a shot. They get shots, but winning the WAC is NOT ENOUGH to play for a championship. A one game season does not a champion make. The system we have is not perfect, but it is better than many of the proposed systems in the works. Lay off ESPN and cover the news, don't make it.

3) Coaches and players need to be help accountable for playing people with injuries/concussions
Ok. Let me make this clear. I do NOT support the NFL players and their quest for more money for 'playing injured'. This is a stupid argument. When you signed up to play football (for MILLIONS OF DOLLARS), you knew this involved getting the crap kicked out fo you by 350 lb men. That's why you were well compensated for the risk. If you don't like it, DON'T PLAY!! The league should, of course, protect players, but they're still getting blown up by 350 lb men!!!
What I'm talking about is taking players out of games when they're injured/concussed. I know that sounds crazy, but that's the simple answer. Jason Witten was benched in the Cowboys loss by the doctors and was visibly angry on the sideline screaming to get back into the game. The doctor made the right call benching him protecting the Cowboys investment.
Look on the flip side in the Clemson/Auburn game. The Clemson QB was knocked silly by the Auburn defense and had no clue where he was. He was in serious pain and could have been even more injured by reentering the game. What did Dabo do? Put him back into the hardest hitting game of the year. He was in serious pain on every snap that was immediately obvious to anyone watching the game. The outcome surely resulted in the greatest fallen warrior comeback story ever, right? Nope, Auburn won in OT despite the play of the 'courageous' (translated: stupid)QB. (Note: For those who don't know me, I HATE when sports commentators use the word 'courageous' in regards to sports--military personnel fighting for our freedom are 'courageous', single mothers working 4 jobs to feed her family while spending time with their children are 'courageous', trying to get a piece of leather across a line is NOT 'courageous') If coaches truly care about their players, they would never put a players career/future on the line to win a game NO MATTER THE COST. A coach who cares more about a player than winning is who I want coaching my kids some day, especially in college.

4) Michigan...THEY ARE WHO WE THOUGH THEY WERE
Thank you Wolverines for proving my point. Mediocrity looks to be right around the corner. Yes, Denard Robinson is explosive and exciting, but there's no way he can carry them on his back the whole season. The defense is atrocious and once opposing defense realize that they're playing 11 on 1 (Robinson), it's just going to get easier and easier. UMass (yeah Div 1-AA--yeah I said it) just gave a blueprint on how to beat Michigan. It may not happen next week (Bowling Green), or the next (Indiana), but the writing is on the wall. Looks like we're getting more of the same from good ole Rich Rod.

5) The MAC is really, really bad (really)
I was at the massacre in the Shoe on Sat and it was just as ugly as it appeared on TV. Ohio was completely drubbed up and down the field. Their last minute touchdown (I think) was against our 9 (yeah we didn't put a full 1 out) best towel boys. It was just embarassing--I really started feeling (a little) bad for them at the end of the 1st half. Toledo (blown out by Arizona at home), Kent State (shut out by PSU), directional Michigans--tune in next week for those Eastern Michigan Eagles and their crapulence, NIU, Buffalo,... the list goes on and on and it's just horrible. It's looking like Temple (yeah, Bill Cosby's alma mater) could run away with the conference under RB Bernard Pierce (pun intended). This one could come down to the wire for the coveted Motor City Bowl berth. Maybe that's why they suck, no one in their right mind would consider a trip to Detroit something for which to strive.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Grading the Bucks--Ohio U (week 3)

Another shellacking but still some critical comments for the Scarlet and Gray

Offense: B+
Again, 34 in the 1st half? What do they need to do to get that coveted A??? This offense certainly clicked through the air this week and Pryor was solid for the first 28 minutes. I can't give an A to a team that has yet to establish a running game. Against OU, the Buckeyes should have run it right through them, but it just didn't happen. The interior line seems fine on pass protection, but not nasty enough to run it down their throats. Also, Pryor's INTs were, plain and simple, bad. He lofted them up into coverage which is a no-no. I understand the game was over, but the offense was way too 'bored' in the late 1st and entire 2nd half. Regardless of the score, the offense needs to play with a sense of urgency at all times.

Defense: A
Another great game by the Silver Bullets. Total 1st half dominance exhibited in which I don't think Ohio broke the 50. Also, 5 more turnovers to add to the total. I know it was Ohio, but that's quality no matter who it's against. Not too much to complain about here other than the garbage touchdown at the end. With our DLine, we still need a little more pressure on the QB when we enter Big 10 play. Little concerned about the injuries to the Buckeye secondary but I think we'll be ok.

Special Teams: C-
Nothing special about our return teams but nothing wrong there either. The coverage teams were much better this week but don't forget that OU returned a kickoff (thanks to some blocks in the back). Even with penalties, you cannot let OU (or anyone) return kicks. It was of course called back, but the refs miss those often so need better coverage. The placekicking was fine so no complaints. The big mark on this unit is a blocked punt....against Ohio. Are you serious? Buchanan actually punted pretty well, but the protection scheme is terrible. Tressel needs to fix these special teams gaffes as we go forward.

Coaching: B
Ok OSU coaches. You listened to me with regard to Stoneburner and started using the spectacular TE, and for that, I thank you. I have one major problem with the playcalling in that the Buckeyes refused to establish a running game. I know we started a bit slow on the ground, but it seemed like Pryor passed 4 times more than he handed off (I'm not counting the scrambles since those were called passes). The defense seemed to sit back a bit but no complaints on the defensive playcalling, but the offense played a little too much of a run and shoot style rather than a Big Ten, Woody Hayes, 3 yards and a cloud of dust style. Note, I love the pass and don't think we need to regress back to the ages of run run run, but you need to mix it up. When the foes are stronger, you can't throw all day with the threat of the run or they'll spy Pryor and drop the rest into coverage. This is a big point of concern for the Bucks.

Once again, great game by the Bucks. Next week will probably be far uglier. Eastern Michigan is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad. Until then, GO OHIO, BEAT THE EAGLES!

Random thoughts (week 3)

I needed to say a few things about this weekend and I didn't know where to put them.
1) Why do I listen to others and not my gut?
I had Arizona over Iowa all year, but I heard some good points about the Arizona OLine and their collapse vs. Neb in the Holiday Bowl which swayed me. I need to learn to go with my gut. I had Arizona at 2 in the Pac 10 (behind Stanford or tied) and I knew this would be a heck of a game.
2) Mark Dantonio's call was not that gutsy...in fact, it was the right call
Before the sack on 3rd down, the kick was absolutely the correct call. Always go to 2OT when you have a chip shot and you're at home. When Cousins was sacked, the FG went from a chip shot to shaky range. The kicker was young, the kick was long, and the situation was ripe for a fake. I give the man credit for making the call, but it wasn't that big of a stretch. No one blames the coach (rightfully so) when the kicker misses the kick (cough...Clemson). It was the right call any way you spin it. Hats off to Sparty!

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Picks Week 3--Doldrum time

The slate in week 3 is just horrible. Very few games of note and SECESPN has once again chosen an SEC site for College Gameday...even though the best game of the week is in Tucson.

Texas Longhorns @ Texas Tech Red Raiders



Gomer: Texas Tech has all but disappeared from the national picture and now has a chance to force themselves back with an upset of a very overrated Texas squad. Mack Brown is one of my favorite coaches in NCAA Football but getting his offense to function this week and function consistently may be a challenge, especially on the road. I like Tommy Tuberville's squad in the upset. UT: 18--TT: 31

Chief: All the hype of this game comes from the 2008 thriller in which Michael Crabtree broke the hearts of Longhorn Nation with the game-winning touchdown (predicted by me!). This year, EVERYONE IS DIFFERENT! There are very little similarities between those teams and these on the Lubbock turf. Many have suggested upset due to Gilbert's shakiness (first road test) and Tuberville's defensive pressure but I don't see it. Tommy Bowden (wait...it's Tuberville....but they look exactly alike) doesn't have the athletes to hang. UT: 31--TT: 21


Notre Dame Fighting Irish @ Michigan State Spartans

Gomer: Notre Dame is slowly showing that they really aren't all that better under Brian Kelly. I think Kelly is going to be successful at ND, but it's fun to kick the domers while they're down. Mark Dantonio will have the Green and White ready to win this rivalry game and will be re-invigorated by the return of last year's best rusher, Larry Caper. Go Green! ND: 27--MSU: 37

Chief: Another game in the realm of 'who cares'. Brian Kelly showed last week that he (unfortunately for the Irish) brough his defense (or lack thereof) to South Bend. MSU has looked pretty decent so far and Notre Dame has disappointed (I guess you can only be disappointed if you actually expected a change). MSU should roll in East Lansing by playing some solid defense (Greg Jones is a beast). Dayne Cris might need more smelling salts this week. ND: 17--MSU: 27


Iowa Hawkeyes @ Arizona Wildcats

Gomer: Serious potential for a HUGE flop by the Big Ten and a massive statement by typical Pac-10 cellar dweller Arizona. Iowa is usually well-coached and disciplined but the Hawkeyes will need to be consistent on the road to pull out a win. Most may call for a shootout, but I expect a defensive battle... Stoops vs. Ferentz should be a good one. IU: 14--Zona: 12

Chief: I am sooooo close to pulling the trigger on this one. I do like the Hawkeyes but a road test against a very underrated Wildcat team. The Wildcats are extremely balanced with Nick Foles as a solid QB. Tuscon is actually a very tough place to go for top 10 teams (remember Dennis Dixon Oregon?). Regardless, the Iowa d-line is about as good as the Nebraska line that destroyed the Wildcats. I want to call it, but I just can't. It wouldn't surprise me if the Cats pull the stunner. This is by far the best game of the week. IU: 20--Zona: 17


Ohio Bobcats @ THE Ohio State University Buckeyes

Gomer: I personally don't have an issue with the Bobcats until they play the Bucks. There's always that issue of a band "rivalry" and the little brother syndrome of many of the alumni of "Ohio, THE State Univesity" *vomit* The Buckeyes struggled two years ago in this game but the defense is hungry for a shutout and ready to send a message that the Bucks are ready for any foe, not just the opener, not just the "big" game, but for all-comers. Go Bucks. OU: 16--OSU: 40

Chief: Oh MAC teams...how we've missed your crapulence. This week's game should be (and better be) over by half. The Bucks let Boo Jackson hang around 2 years ago but don't expect the same this year. After the smothering defensive performance against Miami including 4 ints against Jacory 'Citgo' Harris, the Bullets should make short work of the Bobcats. Expect a more focused OSU redzone offense and kick coverage unit (only 1 redzone FG and no big returns). Let's face it, Bauserman should be running up numbers in the second half with the game already in hand. WE ARE OHIO STATE, YOU ARE TERRIBLE!! OU: 6--OSU: 48

Other Games
Boise @ Wyoming: Gomer: Boise Chief: Boise
UMass @ Mich: Gomer: Mich Chief: Mich
Ark @ UGA: Gomer: Ark Chief: Ark
GT @ UNC: Gomer: GT Chief: UNC
Kent @ PSU: Gomer: PSU Chief: PSU
Maryland @ WVU: Gomer: WVU Chief: Mary
NIU @ Ill: Gomer: Ill Chief: Ill
ECU @ VT: Gomer: VT Chief: VT
BYU @ FSU: Gomer: FSU Chief: FSU
USC @ Minn: Gomer: USC Chief: USC
IU @ WKU: Gomer: IU Chief: IU
Clem @ Aub: Gomer: Aub Chief: Aub
UF @ Tenn: Gomer: UF Chief: UF

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

5 Things We've Learned (Week 2)

Here's another weekly installment I'm hoping to add to the blog. Keep checking in weekly for these installments (tell your friends!). Expect to see 'Grading the Bucks', '5 Things We've Learned', and 'Picks' on a weekly basis but I haven't decided when to post. Here we go!

1) Boise State is screwed....or are they
After the enormous resume building win in DC over Virginia Tech, Boise appeared to have dispatched their main opponent and positioned themselves in prime position to sneak into the Championship game (if they finish undefeated). Someone forgot to tell Frank Beamer how important VA Tech's future success was to Boise's resume. The Hokies paid the Broncos back by laying a monster early season egg (wait, I think I've seen this one before...) and dropping a home game to FCS James Madison U. This certainly hurts Boise's perception and will as the season goes on, but let's look at the polls. Boise is still 3 in the poll that matters and the computer impact will be minimal. If VA Tech rebounds (which they probably will) and makes a run at the ACC title (no reason they can't), the resume builder returns. Before you jump down my throat, I believe this should kill the Boise momentum, but the coaches pretty much ignore the actual games and vote based on win/loss. Let's face it, if Bama, OSU, and Boise gone undefeated, no matter the spread, Boise is left out. This hurts Boise's argument vs. big conference (Big 10, SEC) 1 loss team, and I think that regardless of the VT outcome, Boise was left out unless there are no major undefeated teams--and probably still out vs. a 1-loss OSU, 1-loss Bama or 1-loss Oklahoma.

2) Those sanctions REALLY hurt USC
In week 1, USC showed an explosive offense under Lane Kiffin but the Monte Kiffin's defense couldn't even slow a mediocre Hawaii team. Major concerns on the defense, but it appeared the offense under Matt Barkley and Ronald Johnson would pick up the slack. Week 2 gave a different story with the Trojans squeaking out a 3 point win at home vs. a BAD Virginia team. The defense only gave up 14 (still a bit much with a missed FG), but the offense couldn't move the ball! The trojans are standing on the brink of mediocrity. I know they're 2-0, but it's a very precarious and nerve-wracking start in LA.

3) Is Michigan back....again (Same story different year)
Let me tell you a story about the Wolverines. Here's a team that had tough times the previous year, but a new QB emerged to lead an explosive UM offense to the next level in a big win in Week 1. Week 2 followed close behind with the Irish in which this 'savior of the Blue nation' scored a go ahead touchdown in the final minute to lead Michigan to a 2-0 start. Of course, I'm referring to 2009 and Tate Forcier. Wait, the same thing just happened this year. Sign me up for the bandwagon because 2009 ended successfully for the Blue! Wait...bowlless...again. Granted, Denard Robinson has been super explosive and exciting to watch in the first 2 weeks, but UConn is in the Big East (bad) and Notre Dame lost Jimmy Clauson from a mediocre team last year (bad). Not denying the excitement in Ann Arbor, but let's sit back and make sure this year is for real before we hand out the Heisman and take the Buckeyes from the Big Ten pedestal. To be honest, a winning season is a major victory. A 5-0 start isn't out of the question, but last year started 4-0 in Michigan. Let's see how they finish.

4) No love for Oklahoma
I was big on OU in the preseason due to the second year for Landry Jones's stache and a little less competition in the Big 12 with Texas taking a step back. I was also guilty of jumping back after their week 1 stinker vs. Utah State but they rebounded in a huge way against my boys from Tallahassee. Let's be honest, this FSU isn't the FSU of the 90s, but it is indeed a pretty good team that the Sooners throttled at home. I circled this game in the preseason as a likely Nole loss due to the Sooners home dominance, but week 1 game me hope for the upset...oops. After being dropped in the polls for squeaking by a bad Utah State team (lookahead maybe...I mean, absolutely), there was no rebound for smoking the Noles. I'm all for coaches and media being very flexible week to week with the schedule (they are WAY to rigid in that losses seem to be the only way for some teams to drop regardless of score), but if you punish the Sooners for a close win over a bad team, reward them for a big win over a good team.

5) Chip Kelly can coach offense
Oregon went on the road into vaunted SEC country (overrated) to fight the Vols on their turf. Granted, the Volunteers are a work in progress (come on, the coach had to teach the players how to shower), but they were SMOKED in Neyland stadium when the Ducks found their stride. I never really thought UT would win the game, but Oregon was able to run all over them (SEC defense what?). Let's not forget that Oregon lost their big play QB Masoli when he was kicked off the team for a felony (naturally, he ended up in the SEC. Where felons go) and big time punching back Blount and they still dominated the Vols offensively. LaMichael James threw his hat in the Heisman race by putting on a performance like that on the road in a really tough environment.

Those are my thoughts and let me leave you with a question: Is parity in college football dead? This past week in college football featured a multitude of premier matchups...and the big boys all cruised. When I speak to parity, I ask if anyone can get into the title talk that didn't start in the top 10? I don't think they'll be left out due to the voting process, I just argue that those in the top 10 at the beginning of the year (except VT) are a clear step above the rest.

It's looking like the championship will contain 2 of the following (because I don't see anyone 'joining the party'): Bama, OSU, Boise, TCU, Oklahoma, Iowa, Wisconsin, Texas, Florida, Oregon, maybe Nebraska, maybe South Carolina). Any arguments?

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Grading the Bucks (week 2--U Miami)

I felt that this would be a fun new addition to the blog. Following each game, I will grade the 3 main aspects of the Buckeye football team and the coaches. Spending so much time in the stands/recliner being the coach/commentator/etc., I think I should pass on the wealth of knowledge. Warning: I will be a tough grader because THE Ohio State University needs to be held to a higher standard.

Offense: B
Hard to complain too much after putting up 36 points on a top 15 team, but this is Ohio State. Pryor had a great game running the ball but the passing game held him back a bit. Granted, he made a few beautiful passes (Posey and TD to Saine), but way too many bad misses (most to the big TE Stoneburner). The primary detractor from the offensive grade is the red zone performance. I believe OSU was held to a field goal in 4 or 5 drives inside the 20...that just doesn't get it done. Finally, the running game never got going (except with Pryor). Herron ran well but not exceptional and Saine had a bad ground day. Good day but not enough.

Defense: A-
Here's my 'jerk professor'. This defense played a great game, but there were a few too many yards given up and bend don't break. I'd go A without the TD and A+ were it not for the TD and drive inside the 10. The first half was a solid A+ in which the defense gave up a FG after a 15 yard drive. 4 INTs, no matter how they come, is a huge victory. I thought Harris had too much time to sit in the pocket on most plays. Again, the Bullets only gave up 2 significant drives (one ending on a TD and the other with the spectacular Cam Heyward INT and 'sprint' 80 yards) so a great day at the ball park, but still a few things to shore up on the D-Line.

Special Teams: D
And we come to the negative. The special teams would have a solid F were it not for Jamaal Berry, Jordan Hall, and Devin Barclay. This is the worse kick coverage (two straight games) I've seen in the Tressel era. Yesterday was the first time in OSU history the opponent returned a punt and kick in the same game (both with horrible coverage). The bright spot was the OSU kick return game that could actually improve the grade more if Berry didn't trip on his own feet (bad) and Hall didn't get run down by the KICKER (Citgo). Let's not forget Barclay almost broke Nugent's record if he didn't go shankapotamus on his 6th field goal. Without the miss, I might have improved the grade because 5 field goals (even though they were short) certainly made a difference. Tressel certainly has work to do with kick/punt coverage and field goal kicking (never ok to miss a short one...never).

Coaching: B
Overall, the schemes were very good, but I can't give an A to a group that can't convert in the red zone. I like the option being mixed in and the designed runs with TP because that's been completely missing from this offense. A key factor offensively that was missing was Stoneburner. When Pryor threw to him, he missed badly. With a huge target like that, I really believe the OSU coaches need to target him far more. Overall, the run/pass mix was pretty solid. Defensively, the play calling was ok, but again, they let Harris get way to comfortable in the pocket. Harris showed that he had an NFL caliber arm with some beautiful touch passes. To counter that, rush him and force him into quick decisions...I felt we sat back too much.

Again, hard to be this tough on a team with a double digit win over a team ranked 12, but you need to expect perfection at OSU. Great week, big win, but still work to do (every coach's dream). On to the next one!

Saturday, September 11, 2010

2010 Week 2--National Championships anyone?

After last week whet your whistle for college football, time to jump right in to the main course. This early week features an astounding FOUR national championship rematches--and it's only week 2! So many great games this week, it's hard to figure out where to turn your attention. We missed week 1, but there was nothing going on last week so let's get to work.



Penn State @ Alabama:

Gomer: As my career as a music educator has really become all-encompassing, I feel it necessary to let everyone know that I don't keep track of as many pre-season things as I used to. Be that as it may, those who know me, know that I always have an opinion to share about a sporting event. All that said, PSU just doesn't strike fear into anyone's hearts... well except maybe Jim Tressel's when the 'Nits come to Ohio Stadium at night... But seriously, PeeSU doesn't stand much of a chance in this one. The Tide could be missing their entire first string, and still beat the Lions. As much as I'd like to see the Big Ten pull an upset, not gonna happen. PSU: 9 Bama: 37

Chief: The bluebloods meet in Tuscaloosa in a rematch of the 1979 Sugar Bowl goalline stand. Unfortunately for those in Happy Valley, I don't envision this being much of a battle. PSU has a true freshman at QB for the first time in the program's history...and Bama is not exactly a simple test. The defending champions should make easy work of the Lions with the Nick Saban defense and the bevy of backs. Royster gets some yards for the Blue and White, but not nearly enough. PSU: 13 Bama: 31


Michigan @ Notre Dame:

Gomer: The game in which no one should be able to win. I hate Michigan. I HATE Notre Dame. Maybe it's former coach, wise-ass Charlie Weiss and the golden boy (aka overrate) Brady Quinn/Jimmy Clausen/insert big-name recruit here. Michigan shouldn't have a problem moving the ball against ND, but ND shouldn't have a problem moving the ball against Michigan. This is one of the few days of the year where I will gladly tell any "friend" who cheers for Michigan, "GO BLUE!" UM: 39 ND: 33

Chief: The battle of the programs that "are back"...but not really. Michigan is led by dynamic QB Denard Robinson who had a field day running the ball in week 1 vs. UConn, and I was actually surprised by the lack of offense in the ND opener vs. Purdue. Even with the week 1 performances, I don't think either of these programs are ready to go to the next level. Robinson will run, but the Irish will score (Michigan capitalized on too many turnovers last week). Too many blows will knock Denard out of a key late series in which the Irish will hold at home to take the game. Mich: 24--ND: 27


Florida State @ Oklahoma:

Gomer: Florida State is in a position to really disappoint it's fans. OU looked awful against Utah State and the Seminoles looked sharp against SAMFORD. Not really sure what to expect, I think Oklahoma's program is in better shape than FSU's, and well, Bob Stoops can do some weird stuff from time-to-time. FSU: 24 OU: 31

Chief: 2000 National Championship remix (OU 13-2). Going into the year, I felt this was a sure loss due to the historic performance of Oklahoma in Norman, but the defensive embarassment last week gives me great hope. Christian Ponder was spectacular last week (granted against Samford) and is probably the best QB no one is talking about (outside Heisman shot?). The Sooner defense struggled against a horrible USU team but the Noles got a little swagger to start out the Jimbo era in Tallahassee. I'm going with the upset with a late Ponder TD scramble to end the Sooner championship hopes! FSU: 38--OU: 34


Georgia @ South Carolina:

Gomer:
SEC SEC SEC SEC.... blahhhhh. Neither of these teams will make it to the BCS National Championship game, but that doesn't mean it won't be interesting. Spurrier is trying to show he knows how to coach an offense somewhere other than with Florida, and Richt is busy adopting kids. 'Cocks find a way to win. UGA: 13 USC: 37

Chief: Spurrier got the hopes of Cocky nation up last week with an impressive week 1 win over Southern Miss and Georgia comes in with a bit of disappointment with the loss of stellar wide out AJ Green. With Spurrier, the focus is always on the offense, but the defense at South Carolina was a major bright spot last year. This is a huge game in the SEC East that no one is looking at. The Years of the Gators are coming to an end. Who will pick up the reins? GO COCKS with the home field advantage. UGA: 20--USC: 24


Miami @ Ohio State:

Gomer: 2,808 days... wow. That's how long it's been since Ohio State won it's most recent national championship over the unbeatable Miami Hurricanes. It's been beaten like a dead horse, but this game isn't about what happen that glorious day in the desert, when I was a week freshman in college, but it's about how the fans of both teams perceived the win. For the Buckeyes it was a sigh of relief and the sign of an exciting era of OSU football. For the 'Canes, it was the sign of the "end times" for their program as they have been on a downward spiral for years. Randy Shannon is the right coach for Miami, but he hasn't had enough time to build and give Tressel's crew his best shot. 'Da U': 13 OSU: 38

Chief: 2002 National Championship--THERE'S A FLAG!! (OSU: 31--UM: 24/2OT). The two national powers collide for the first time since the epic battle in the desert in 02. Since that year, the Buckeyes have maintained a level of excellence (6 BCS bowls, 6 Big Ten titles, 1 Heisman winner) and the Canes...not so much (1 BCS bowl, 1 Big East title, 0 Heismans). Jacory Harris leads the high powered offense of the Canes but he's been very suspect at times. Star running back Cooper is probably out for the clash in the Shoe (another blow). Both D-Lines are stacked, but Miami's secondary is not as experienced. The Silver Bullet defense came out firing on all cylinders last week (albeit, against Marshall) but were really laying the wood. The offense was spectacular with the Brandon Saine explosive running game opening up a bevy of options for dual-threat QB Terrelle Pryor. I was surprised the line on the game was so high, but I still think the Bucks cover in the craziness of the Shoe. GO BUCKS! 'The U': 17--OSU: 27


Other Picks

Illinois St @ NW Gomer: NW Chief: NW

South Dakota @ Minn Gomer: Minn Chief: Minn

West. Ill. @ Purdue Gomer: Purdue Chief: Purdue

Iowa St. @ Iowa Gomer: Iowa Chief: Iowa

BYU @ AF Gomer: BYU Chief: BYU

Oregon @ Tenn Gomer: Oregon Chief: Oregon

Toledo @ Ohio Gomer: Ohio Chief: Ohio

SIU @ Ill Gomer: SIU Chief: Ill

Stanford @ UCLA Gomer: UCLA Chief: Stan



Friday, September 10, 2010

First major SEC referee gaffe of the year?

I just felt the need to write about this after seeing what I believe is a greivous rule misinterpretation in the Thurs night Aub/Mississippi State game. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

The Bulldogs were going into the endzone for the touchdown (I believe in the late 1st/early 2nd quarter) when the quarterback fumbled the ball at the 1. It was recovered in the endzone by Mississippi State and promptly ruled a touchdown.

Now, please set me straight but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. An offensive player is not allowed to advance the ball on a fumble. Therefore, the correct ruling (in my opinion) is MSU ball at the 1. Granted, if Auburn had recovered the ball, the ruling would be a touchback. To make matters worse, the play was reviewed and confirmed. Of course, the band of monkeys calling the game (known as Rece Davis, Jesse Palmer, and Craig James) never mentioned the incorrect or at least confusing ruling and spent the time saying Auburn recovered (which they clearly did not).

I would sincerely like confirmation that I'm not crazy on this rule interpretation because it always amazes me how a) paid NCAA officials can so blatently miss a call by incorrectly reading the rule and b) people with the best job ever, watching and analyzing college football, can be so poor at the fundamentals of the game. If Joe Fan (aka, me) can do their job better and would be more appreciative, why don't I have that job? ESPN, I'm waiting to hear back with your job offer soon. I promise, I will have more fun with the position than anyone else (and not sacrifice the quality of commentary--might have less USC/SEC homerism...uh oh, shouldn't have said that...).

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

TS Poll - Final Results

Well, it's the time of year where everyone looks back at the 2009 college football season and looks forward to what might be next year. With that said, here is a look at the final rankings in the TS Poll. Enjoy!

  1. Alabama
  2. Texas
  3. Florida
  4. Boise State
  5. Ohio State
  6. Cincinnati
  7. Iowa
  8. TCU
  9. Oregon
  10. Penn State
  11. Georgia Tech
  12. Virginia Tech
  13. BYU
  14. Pitt
  15. Central Michigan
  16. Nebraska
  17. Miami (Fl)
  18. Houston
  19. LSU
  20. Wisconsin
  21. USC
  22. Clemson
  23. Texas Tech
  24. Navy
  25. Utah
The end of year conference rankings look like this:

  1. SEC
  2. Big East
  3. Pac 10
  4. Big 12
  5. Big Ten
  6. ACC
  7. Mt. West
  8. WAC
  9. C-USA
  10. MAC
  11. Sun Belt

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Draper Index post week 12

1. Florida
2. Texas
3. Alabama
4. TCU
5. Cincinnati
6. Ohio State
7. Oregon
8. Boise State
9. Georgia Tech
10. Iowa
11. Oklahoma State
12. USC
13. Pittsburgh
14. Utah
15. Penn State
16. Virginia Tech
17. BYU
18. California
19. LSU
20. Nebraska
21. Oregon State
22. Oklahoma
23. Texas Tech
24. Clemson
25. Miami (FL)

Friday, November 20, 2009

Week 12 - Michigan Week

A few important games this week, but none is more important than 106th Edition of The Game held in Ann Arbor this year...

#25 California vs. #17 Stanford
Gomer: Stanford has bun the Pac-10's juggernaut as of late slamming both Oregon and USC in two straight weeks. After the recent output the Cardinal is certainly due for a let down. Stanford has made huge strides under Jim Harbaugh, who will not be at Michigan any time soon, but I am going to call for a let down game this week against the Bears. Cal: 34--Stanford:27

Chief: Stanford is the hottest team in America right now with Toby Gerhart toting the rock and bringing hope to young white RBs everywhere. Freshman QB Andrew Luck has also been a major component of the Cardinal success. Cal jumped back into relevance after taking down Arizona (yeah, that made them important) with star Jahvid Best sidelined. Even though Cal made a push last week, Stanford is on a role and will keep chugging along. Jim Harbaugh is sent to Michigan with another big win in this 'The Game'. Hopefully, he doesn't bring it to our 'Big Game'. Stanford: 41--Cal: 24

#11 Oregon vs. Arizona
Gomer: Oregon looks to continue their march to the first non-USC Pac-10 title in 8 years. Arizona is a decent team but was unimpressive in their recent loss to Cal. Oregon has been just plain impressive on offense. With Gameday in town the Tuscon faithful will be in full force, but Oregon is just a better team. UO: 35--UA: 18
Chief: Welcome back to earth Wildcats of Arizona. Everyone was jumping on the 1st Arizona Rose Bowl, but it's just not going to happen. Yes, Arizona is steadily improving year in and year out, but Oregon is too tough to drop this game. While Arizona is quite balanced, Oregon will put on a rushing clinic with LaMichael James and quite literally run away with the game. Maybe Legarotte Blout will get to throw a few punches in this one. OU: 48--Zona: 17




#10 Ohio State vs. Michigan
Gomer: Staring the 2nd straight losing season in the face along with another bowl-less season will have the Wolverines whipped into a frenzy. While Michigan is facing another rough off-season the Buckeyes are coming off of clinching their first Rose Bowl under Jim Tressel and look to assure themselves of another outright Big Ten Title. While technically this game has no baring on OSU winning the Big Ten or the Rose Bowl, it means everything to the seniors who don't want to leave with a sour taste. Michigan's offense will find a way to score a few, but the Buckeye defense will prove to be too much. OSU: 41--UM: 14
Chief: And we come to the finale. It may look and feel different, but it's still Ohio State vs. Michigan. The Buckeyes enter the unfriendly confines of Ann Arbor to face Dick Rod in his home for the first time. I'm a little concerned about a letdown from Pryor in this game as the Bucks only have pride on the line, but Tressel knows the import of this game regardless of the records. The Seniors will be playing out of there minds and will simply overwhelm the hapless Wolverines. Forcier is too banged up and while Brandon Graham is a very good defender for the Wolverines, he's playing with 10 nobodies. It won't be enough to keep Tressel from 6 straight and an ungodly 7-1 record. GO BUCKS, BEAT BLUE!! OSU: 45--scUM: 10


Other Games:

Minnesota vs. #13 Iowa: Gomer: Iowa Chief: Iowa
#4 TCU vs. Wyoming: Gomer: TCU Chief: TCU
#14 Penn State vs. Michigan State: Gomer: PSU Chief: PSU
#16 Wisconsin vs. Northwestern: Gomer: NW Chief: Wisconsin
Purdue vs. Indiana: Gomer: PU Chief: PU