Week 11: Terrapindemic

Standings:

1.) Hoying 9-3 (0-3 upset)

2.) Draper 8-4 (1-2 upset)
3.) Schweinfurth 7-5 (1-2 upset)

Trust us, a bye week is a blessing. You want all the time you can get to prepare for WWWIndiana.

We'll turn to the other games of consequence this weekend...what? Not a single ranked matchup? But Alabama is supposed to travel to LSU...whoops. Miami is playing Virginia Tech...oh.  Wisconsin is squaring off against Michigan...ahahahaha.

Fear not! We scrounged another undefeated matchup for you to devour, this time on the other side of the stately I-69 that divides our beloved conference in twain. 

Northwestern Wildcats @ Purdue Boilermakers

Draper: The game we have all been clamoring over is in....West Lafayette? I'm pretty confident the 0's in the loss column are more due to the opponents (hello Iowa) than their strengths.  It's really....REALLY hard to get excited about a B1G West clash, but it's 2020, so why not?  I guuuueeesssss I'll lean to the Wildcats who have beaten Maryland, but I can't pretend to have a good handle on this.  Roll the dice and see what hits.  Can Northwestern make it 2 out of 3 trips to Indy? Sure...why not.  NW: 31 -- PU: 24
Hoying: Don't laugh; this game could very well be a play-in to the Big Ten Championship, which could effectively make it a Playoff semifinal...semifinal?. With Nebraska falling flat against the Wildcats last week, and the Badgers a cough and a sneeze away from being disqualified from a trip to Indy, the winner of this game will suddenly find itself an effective 2 games up on the rest of the non-Wisconsin (play it louder) Big Ten West. Oh, and you probably already knew this, but both of these teams miss Ohio State this year, and Northwestern doesn't play Indiana, Penn State, or Michigan either! (YMMV on the merits of missing the last two.) Turning our eyes to the game at hand, how about that Northwestern ball-hawking defense? The Wildcats lead the nation (on per-game average) with 8 interceptions in their first 3 games. Northwestern was outgained by both Iowa and Nebraska but the turnovers have made the difference both times. Can lightning strike thrice? (quice?) Does it need to? The Boilers are still undefeated but needed a late red zone stop to finish off Illinois on Halloween. A COVID bye gave them an extra week to prepare for this game, but they're still missing their best weapon, WR Rondale Moore (*shudder*), who went down with a leg injury in early 2019. Purdue isn't out of weapons (hello, WR David Bell) but the Northwestern defense will be the difference. NU: 24--PU: 17
Schweinfurth: I really thought Nebraska would beat Northwestern last week, but the Wildcats surprised as they always do. This is almost the same Northwestern team with the exception of Brandon Peters (remember that guy Harbaugh forgot about). Turns out he is actually somewhat good when not caught up in that suck hole. I haven't watch much Purdue football, but they have weapons on the outside. Even with Rondale Moore on the MIA list. There is just something about Northwestern that says this is a year they challenge for the B1G West. This one will be close and the Wildcats get a late turnover for the win. NU: 31--PU: 28

Upset Special
Draper: Washington State over Oregon

Hoying: Michigan State over Indiana
Schweinfurth: BC over Notre Dame

[note: no points for picking a ranked team to beat an unranked team as an Upset Special but Michigan opened -3 against Wisconsin]

Zero Fun, Sir

"Why are you smiling?"
    "'Cause I love football. Football's fun."
"Fun, sir. It's fun?"
    "Yes."
"You sure?"
    "I think so -"
"Now you're thinkin'. First you smile, then you think. You think football is still fun?"
    "Uh, yes."
"Sir."
    "Yes-no, sir."
"No?"
    "Um, it was fun."
"Not any more though, is it? Is it?"
    "Not right now, no."
"No, it's not fun anymore. Not even a little bit."
    "Uh... no."
"Make up your mind. Think, since you're thinkin'. Go on, think. Is it fun?"
    "No, sir."
"No? Absolutely not?"
    "Zero fun, sir."

- Me talking to other Ohio State fans (only I don't usually call them "sir")

In 2015, the Ohio State Buckeyes went 12-1. They opened the season by avenging a championship season loss to Virginia Tech in convincing fashion, and finished the year by walloping a #10 Michigan by 29 and smashing #8 Notre Dame in the Fiesta Bowl.

And it was the most miserable season of Ohio State football since the interregnum in 2011.

Oh sure, there were other high points like destroying Penn State in the Shoe's first blackout. But all season long, the only thing Buckeye fans wanted to talk about was "Why aren't they killing everybody?"

Coming into 2015, the Buckeyes had just finished what was probably the greatest 3-game stretch in its history, knocking off Wisconsin, Alabama, and Oregon in impressive fashion to climb the ladder to the team's 8th, and most improbable, national championship. If anything, the team was supposed to be better in 2015 after losing almost no key players from 2014's title run. But though the defense continued at championship pace, the Buckeyes never found their identity on offense until it was too late.

How much fun was 2003, watching another defending national champion return 75% of their starters only to eke out 11 nailbiting wins and a BCS bowl victory?

And how much fun are you having now, fresh off possibly the most dominant season in Ohio State history, with 2020 Ohio State skating by with wins by 35, 13, and 22 points?

Wait. One of those things is not like the other.

3 games into the season, the Buckeyes haven't been seriously threatened in any of their games. The latest they've trailed was 6:55 into the first quarter of the Nebraska game, which is also the only time they've trailed all season. The latest they've been up by single digits was 6:18 into the second half against Penn State. Despite the lackluster final score against Rutgers, the Buckeyes led 42-9 entering the bizarro trick play-centric fourth quarter.

R-E-L-A-X

No, the running game probably isn't as good as last year's. But it's hard to tell when Justin Fields has a grand total of 20 non-sack carries so far and the team's game plan seems to be built around crafting a masterful Heisman propaganda campaign. No, the defense doesn't appear to be on the same level as last year's brick wall. But 30 of the 69 points they've surrendered this year have been in the fourth quarter, when the outcome of the game is no longer seriously in doubt. (They've also held their opponents to an astounding 0 for 6 on two point conversions, which should help frustrate any comeback attempts by future teams.) Why so serious? This team doesn't have to be perfect at this point. At what point did you think the 2014 Buckeyes were championship caliber? If your answer is any time before November, you're lying. At what point were you convinced that the 2002 Buckeyes were going to win the national title? If your answer is any time before halftime of the Fiesta Bowl, you're either lying or you were too naïve to know any better (like I was back then).

Give the secondary time to find their footing. Give Master Teague time; Zeke didn't blow up until the second half of 2014, and Dobbins was downright pedestrian in 2018. And just enjoy the season no matter what comes. Not everything has to be national title or bust. Two months ago we lived in despair that we wouldn't get to see this team play at all. We still have a chance to ruin Indiana's best season in 50 years. We still have a chance to lay a Rich Rod era style beat down on That Team Up North. And yes, in a season in which no team looks invincible (except maybe Alabama), there's still a great chance to take the glorious golden lipstick home a second time. Zero excuses not to have fun, sir.

Week 10: November Is for Contenders

 Standings:

1.) Draper 6-1 (1-1 upset)
1.) Schweinfurth 6-1 (1-1 upset)

1.) Hoying 6-1 (0-2 upset)

The Pac-12 returns (except in Berkeley, lol), the Big Ten features another ranked matchup, and the Power 5 continues their Sisyphean quest for that elusive 4th playoff spot. Yup, it's November, Buckeye Nation. Buckle up for excitement, although not much (hopefully) for the Silver Bullets over the next few weeks.

FRIDAY NIGHT

Brigham Young Cougars @ Boise State Broncos

Draper: BYU is the non-power 5 team du jour that everyone expects to make get blasted by the 1 seed in the playoff and it might just happen.  Zach Wilson has been very good against the competition he's faced, so it will be interesting how he performs on a bigger stage.  Boise is that scrappy team that just never goes away, but I'm not sure they have the horses (pun intended) in this one.  This will be the Cougars biggest challenge, but I think they squeak through on the Smurf Turf.  BYU: 41 -- Boise: 37
Hoying: Did you know that some teams outside of Rose Bowl World have actually been playing football since the normal start of the season? And that two of them have already racked up 7 wins? One of those 7-win teams is Clemson, and you may be surprised to know that the other is BYU, the only non-Power 5 team in modern history to win a national championship. With no conference championship to look forward to, the Cougars are only 3 games (and a Cincinnati loss) away from, at worst, a New Year's Six bid. And they've looked good on their way, blowing up their (admittedly weak) competition. Boise is Boise, showing no signs of slowing down after another easy MWC championship last year. BYU prevented the Broncos from parlaying that league title into a NY6 bid last year, and with Heisman contender (?!) Zach Wilson at QB and a suffocating defense to match, they'll do it again.  BYU: 31--Boise: 24
Schweinfurth: From what I can tell, Boise has struggled against a few teams, but keeps winning. BYU, I just don't know a lot about. Boise just has that knack to be annoying all year. BYU: 35--Boise: 42

SATURDAY

Michigan Wolverines @ Indiana Hoosiers

Draper: Wow....this game is surprisingly difficult.  Windiana has looked pretty good in back to back weeks, and Michigan has split the difference.  UM was a dumpster fire against Sparty last week which made little sense.  I didn't expect a Paul Bunyan beatdown from TTUN, but I also didn't see the massive bed-pooping that we saw.  Joe Milton is freaking huge, but he doesn't seem to have all the elements of a great QB yet.  I'll give the edge to Indiana in the quarterback play category, but I don't know if that will be enough.  Can the Hoosiers deal with success? I'm guessing the Wolverine superior athletes will carry the day.  TTUN: 20 -- IU: 17
Hoying: Welcome back to the Big Ten, featuring a really good team (Ohio State), a couple of really bad teams (Illinois and Minnesota), and a whole bunch of "I dunno" in the middle. Is Indiana really the 13th best team in the country? Last year, the Hoosiers' ceiling was a lot higher before they lost Michael Penix to a season ending injury (right before playing Michigan and Penn State) and he's continued to be a difference maker this year. Penn State bottled him, and the rest of the Indiana O, up for a good 3 quarters before his late game theatrics, and the Lions largely beat themselves with mistakes. Can Indiana really beat Michigan strength-on-strength? Maybe. The Wolverine secondary is...lacking, and Indiana has something called a Whop Philyor to spread all over the field. Michigan is also into year six of "When will Harbaugh actually find a workable QB?", and this year's version is a dump truck who can't throw downfield. That being said, the lines will still favor Michigan (even if boneheaded play calling negates their offensive advantage); there's a reason the Hoosiers haven't won this game in over 30 years. Michigan is the safe choice, so, go with Michigan. TTUN: 31--IU: 24
Schweinfurth: Who are the real Wolverines? They looked like world beaters in their demolition of Minnesota, but not so much against Michigan State. Indiana, on the other hand, has beat Penn State and Buttgers. Indiana is the "Chaos" team and probably better coached, but I just can't pick them to beat the Wolverines. TTUN: 31--IU: 28

Florida Gators vs. Georgia Bulldogs

Draper: The Cocktail Party has lost some luster over the years, but the Gators return to relevance should make for some fun football.  After the brawl broke out last week, Florida is down a slew of players (and maybe a head coach?), but a major traffic accident has removed Georgia's star safety.  I'd posit that UF has a slight edge at QB, but  the defensive edge swings to the Dawgs.  I honestly don't know what to expect as UGA's offense was inept last week, but I do hate the Gators... UF: 24 -- UGA:27 
Hoying: Hoo boy. Another one of these "offense vs. defense" games. Thing is, we've already seen Georgia in one of these games this year. And they were, to put it charitably, not quite ready for primetime. Stetson Bennett looked good, for a half, and then the wheels fell off like it does for 99% of teams that play Alabama. And it'll take more than the usual Kirby Smart sputtering Georgia offense to keep up with Kyle Trask and Kyle Pitts. Without a single Kyle on their roster, the Bulldogs just don't have the power to keep up (only Texas A&M did, because of their field). The Gators take a commanding lead in their chase to lose to Bama in Atlanta for the millionth time (and by a margin of, well, you know). UF: 23--UGA: 20
Schweinfurth: Georgia's offense has been missing this year. It's almost like their future QB transfered... Florida though, is in big trouble after that fight last week. Multiple players are out for the first half and Georgia can take advantage of those missing players. If that happens, Georgia can get out to a quick lead and then just play defense from there. UF: 21--UGA: 28

Clemson Tigers @ Notre Dame Fighting Irish

Draper: I'm planting my flag here.  Clemson is really good.  Not kinda good; not 'good with Trevor Lawrence'; really really good.  DJ Uiagalelei wasn't nearly on Lawrence's level, but he was still very strong in his first game.  And, oh yeah, everyone else on Clemson is solid.  Notre Dame has been flaky all year (except when Hoying picks them to be upset), and I just can't see that changing vs. this juggernaut.  Clemson will rebound from the close win (they did get lucky) over Boston College (like they always do) and smash the Irish.  I don't think this will be close.  Clem: 38 -- ND: 20
Hoying: Remember the last time these teams played? Weren't we all thankful that Notre Dame finished 12-0 so they could get backhanded by the national champs in the Playoff instead of letting Ohio State have another crack at immortality? Well, I have bad news for the Irish this year: they're probably going to have to beat Clemson twice to get back into the Playoff this year. And they totally could, the Irish are good, no doubts there. It's just that Clemson has superstars at every. single. position (remind you of anyone?). And that includes QB; do you really think that the Tigers have been sitting around for 3 years watching Trevor Lawrence skate backwards to ACC titles and not give a single thought as to who his successor would be? Mixmaster DJ Ukulele found his footing awfully quick against Boston College, and even if he didn't, Travis Etienne is going to be a problem running the ball, catching the ball. And the defense is (almost) as good as ever. This one should be close, but Clemson isn't losing until they want to, Lawrence or no Lawrence. Clem: 27--ND: 24
Schweinfurth: Clemson escaped last week. There is no way around it, but they did what great programs do. They may adjustments and took over the game in the second half. I'm still not sold on Notre Dame being this elite of a program. To me, their ranking is inflated due to the delays in the B1G and Pac-12 seasons. Even without Lawrance, Clemson should assert their dominance. Clem: 42--ND: 17

Rutgers Scarlet Knights @ THE Ohio State University Buckeyes

Draper: I was really hoping that Rutgers would enter the Shoe with a B1G East tie with the Buckeyes, but alas...  There's not a whole lot to say here.  The Buckeyes should smash here, but Day may lay off a bit in the end.  I'm surprised how much of these games that Fields is playing, but I think he gets a 4th quarter breather here.  Fields to Olave is the best battery in the country and will continue to impress pro scouts.  The Scarlet Knights might get an early takeaway to give a touch of hope, but Schiano should take a picture of the scoreboard early, because the inevitable is coming for you.  Wilson and Olave both break the 100 yard mark (for the 3rd time this season), Fields keeps his 1:1 ratio of TDs scored to incompletions with 4 more, Sermon and Teague both have nice outings, and we move on.  I also anticipate 2 turnovers and 1 defensive score.  Bucks send Greg Schiano to a VERY 'nice' career record.  Buttgers: 10 -- OSU: 62
Hoying: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ It's Rutgers. I mean, we're back to Greg Schiano Rutgers, most famous for screwing Ohio State out of the 2006 National Championship by beating Louisville on a last minute field goal and allowing Florida to sneak into Glendale instead. And their roster is full of castaways who have actually played in other programs, as opposed to those who never got recruited by anyone else. I mean, even Maryland pushed Ohio State to the brink of defeat 2 years ago, so anything is possible, right? No. It's Rutgers. Look for the Buckeyes to find a serviceable field goal kicker and a reliable slot cornerback to replace Cameron Brown. And look for points. Lots of points. For one team only. RSUNJ: 10--OSU: 59
Schweinfurth: So this game is a thing. Let me just put out an appreciation for Chris Olave. The dude is so smooth and reliable. Need a long third down conversion? Olave is open. Need to take a deep shot? Olave will make the play. The receiver room has had great players, but I can't think of a guy that makes this many plays on a regular basis. In another note, I would like to see the ground game get going this week. Let's see Teague and Sermon get over 100 each and ground the Knights into submission. Name your score on this game and please, no injuries. Buttgers: 13--OSU: 56

Upset Special
Draper: Stanford over Oregon
Hoying: Baylor over Iowa State
Schweinfurth: WVU over Texas

Week 9: Knock Knock

Standings:
1.) Draper 4-1 (1-0 upset)
1.) Hoying 4-1 (0-1 upset)
1.) Schweinfurth 4-1 (0-1 upset)

We hope you enjoyed all the ranked matchups last weekend, because you're getting a total of one this weekend, and it's the game you were all going to watch anyway. That's why ESPN College Gameday is still coming to State College, despite the fact that another the Nittany Lions got caught looking ahead to Ohio State and crashed and burned the week before (no biggie, it's not like an undefeated powerhouse did the exact same thing last year). You can't even blame conference COVID panic for this one, as the only conference that hasn't started back up is the Pac-12, which features a whopping 2 ranked teams. 

But at Let's Go Bucks! we strive to bring you the content you crave. For your reading enjoyment, we've included analysis of one more game, this week's only clash of undefeated teams (not counting teams that haven't played yet). One team has snuck into the rankings for the second time in the last 25 years, and the other might as well have joined them the way this year has gone so far. 

Indiana Hoosiers @ Rutgers Scarlet Knights 

Draper: Everyone knew there would be a battle of undefeated teams vying for 1st place in the B1G East and here we are.  Both Rutgers and Indiana may have won last week due to some mistakes by their opponents (7 turnovers Sparty?), but could this be a Creation of Penix for a new era? Prooooobably not....but this year could get weird.  I just can't buy into Buttgers.  While I'd love it to have undefeated powerhouse Rutgers enter the Shoe, the Hoosiers are hoping for a magical year after taking down a 'top 10 team'.  Both teams are coming off their biggest (only?) win in the last few years so I don't see a hangover advantage either way.  Schiano is reminding the Scarlet Knigths that it's ok to win, but it won't be enough.  Windiana > Buttgers.  IU: 38 -- RSUNJ: 20
Hoying:  One of these teams will find themselves tied or even alone at the top of the Big Ten East standings heading into November, just like we all thought back in February. Both of these teams come into this game off of wins that were kind of fluky. Rutgers benefited from seven Michigan State turnovers (including five fumbles lost), while Indiana...well, Penn State's mistakes in that game defy description but we can try our best anyway: three missed FGs, two INTs setting up short fields for Indiana, and an all-time clock management boner to give the Hoosiers one last chance to send the game to overtime in the first place. I don't think either of these teams is as good as they looked last week, but at least Indiana sucked out against an actual quality opponent while Rutgers was playing pat-a-cake against a Big Ten basement contender. The Scarlet Knights' defense somehow managed to make Rocky Lombardi look good. Michael Penix is going to look even better. IU: 45--RSUNJ: 28
Schweinfurth: I can't pick Buttgers with a straight face until they actually have a pulse in the B1G. What makes this game most interesting is the potential for a let down by Indiana. Let's be honest here. Rutgers has been so bad for so long that one Schiano recruiting class isn't going to fix things. Indiana is the better team, but the letdown keeps the Scarlet Knights around longer than they should. IU: 35--RSUNJ: 28

THE Ohio State University Buckeyes @ Pennsylvania State Nittany Lions

Draper: The other top ten, undefeated matchup is the perceived biggest roadblock on the Buckeyes' quest to repeat.  While this may no longer be the case, Penn State won't be a pushover.  The Buckeyes looked pretty good against Nebraska, but there were some flaws (run blocking and defensive brainfarts).  The Lions' QB isn't as mobile as Martinez which is a major plus, but OSU will certainly draw the PSU's best game.  Injuries to Olave and Cain loom large for each team, but I have faith in the depth at OSU WR more than the depth at PSU RB (and I think Olave plays).  Overall, the difference is Fields and the well-oiled passing offense that simply isn't going to be stopped.  The pass blocking has been phenomenal and the battery of Fields to <insert awesome receiver name here> should carry the day.  OSU: 41 -- PSU: 24
Hoying: I don't think 2020 Penn State is a bad team, or even a mediocre team. Their fluky loss to Indiana was exactly that, a fluke. It featured the kind of brain farts we've come to expect from the Nittany Lions in recent years (nice zone read on 4th and 5) but it's not like very good Ohio State teams are immune to those mistakes either. But the thing is, with the disappearance of RB Journey Brown and the doubtful status of RB Noah Cain, not to mention the departure of Micah Parsons and the other pieces they've lost on defense, I don't think 2020 Penn State is as good as 2019 Penn State. And Ohio State beat Penn State quite comfortably last year, fumble bug aside. I'm not sure that 2020 Ohio State is as good as 2019 Ohio State either, but they are still elite, a word that hasn't applied to Penn State since the glory days of the JoePa era. Justin Fields won't be throwing against air this week, and he'll need to take care not to hold on to the ball too long, but I'm not picking anyone to stop or even slow down this offense until I see the white pawprints on the orange helmets. As for the defense, they sometimes need a week to settle down (remember 21 points from Florida Atlantic last year?) but the line should find opportunities against Penn State's front (as long as they keep containment on Clifford) and we'll see how good the secondary is at containing PSU's "Five hundred!" offense now that Okudah, Fuller, and Arnette are out of the picture. I'm not terribly concerned. OSU: 38--PSU: 20
Schweinfurth: This is not the Penn State team we would have seen in a normal year. No Journey Brown and no Micah Parsons are huge losses for Lions. Sean Clifford is back, but he's not Justin Fields. Ohio State's receivers are just sick. Those dudes are a mismatch for everyone in the B1G. Don't forget there's no White Out this time which is usually a HUGE advantage for the kittens. The Buckeyes should have little problem with in not so Happy Valley this year. Just work  on defending the QB run a bit better and it's all good. OSU: 45--PSU: 21

Upset Special
Draper: Missouri over COVID Florida
Hoying: Arkansas over Texas A&M
Schweinfurth: Texas over OK State

Hey, Penn State. Knock knock.

    Who's there?

Owen.

    Owen who?

0 and 2!

Week 8? Week 1? Return of the Buckeyes

Welcome back, Buckeye Nation. We hope you have enjoyed the extended preseason of exhibition games, featuring some impressive performances by some southern team with numbers on their helmets and some other program coached by one of the first team's former players. But now the meat and potatoes of the 2020 college football schedule can begin. The B1G is back in a big way, and the spotlight isn't brighter anywhere than Columbus, Ohio, as the Playoff Committee desperately searches for a reason not to send 3 SEC teams to Pasadena and New Orleans.

Michigan Wolverines @ Minnesota Golden Gophers

Draper: It's good to be back.  Welcome in to the oldest rivalry in college football.   Normally, you'd expect Michigan to just overwhelm Minnesota with sheer talent, but while the Gopher's are rowing the boat, Michigan players are jumping off faster than ever. While the Buckeyes have players fleeing back to OSU, the Wolverines can't leave fast enough.  I actually think a fully stocked Michigan team would win going away, but this shell with no McCaffery, Collins, etc. will struggle.  I like the Gophers to snag the Little Brown Jug and help ease Michigan fans into the recognition that it's over before it began.  Mich: 17--Minn: 24
Hoying: Beating ranked teams on the road really isn't Michigan's bag, baby. And yet they find themselves favored to dump the Big Ten's recent upstart program in Minneapolis despite the fact that they've lost (i) the former presumed heir to Shea Patterson's throne of mediocrity (Dylan McCaffrey), (ii) their best WR (Nico Collins) and (iii) four of last year's starters on the O-line. This offense took until halftime of the Penn State game last year to figure out which direction was downfield, and now they have to start all over again, other than their adequate stable of running backs. Meanwhile, lurking on the other sideline are one of top QB-WR combos in the conference, maybe even the nation, in Tanner Morgan and Rashod Bateman. Antoine Winfield, Jr. isn't anchoring the Gopher D anymore and the unit as a whole should take a step back from last year, so we'll see how long Josh Gattis needs to break in a new Wolverine offense again. I'm usually pretty bullish on the Wolverines (except the Notre Dame game last year, whoops) but I'm thinking it will take more than one week. Mich: 20--Minn: 23
Schweinfurth: No spring football and a new quarter back for the Harboogers? That's a problem. The Rowboaters return most of their offense and seem to have the better coaching staff (yea, I went there). While the wolverines have the "better recruits," I do think that the Gophers have the better team. The Little Brown Jug heads back to the Land of 10,000 Lakes. Mich: 24--Min: 30

Iowa State Cyclones @ Oklahoma State Cowboys

Draper: Oh goody...a Big 12 match of who cares? Oklahoma St. is carrying the torch for the Big 12 after all the other teams crapped the bed in spectacular fashion, but it seems like we're just waiting for the presumptive shoe to drop.  No one believes they're that great...they just haven't tripped yet.  That being said, I don't necessarily see the Clones as a world beater either.   I think I'll lean on the Pokes keeping the dream alive a bit longer.  The mullet has to be worth something, right? ISU: 24 -- OkSt: 38
Hoying: The Big 12 has never sent a team to a Playoff championship, and it doesn't look that that trend is in jeopardy this year, either. Four weeks into the B12 season, only five teams have yet to accumulate 2 losses, and two of those teams have losses to Sun Belt teams. However, a loss to Sun Belt powerhouse Louisiana hasn't stopped Iowa State from climbing to the top of the Big 12 standings, where they face off against the conference's only remaining undefeated squad, the Oklahoma State Cowboys. The Cowboys' offense has been a bit off so far in this young season, but that could be attributed to the Big 12's odd decision to scavenge the defense that the SEC and ACC decided they wouldn't be using this season. Not that Iowa State has much room to talk; they scored 14 points in that brutal opening loss to the Ragin' Cajuns. Oklahoma State should be nice and rusty rested after last week's game against Baylor was postponed, so I'll ride with the Cowboys at home. ISU: 20--OKSt: 27
Schweinfurth: I have watched more Big 12 football this year than I have in a long time. My biggest takeaway? This league plays some bad football. I really don't trust any of these teams. The Cyclones are known for those wild upsets. Really though, I just don't see it happening. ISU: 21--OKState: 35

 

North Carolina State Wolfpack @ North Carolina Tar Heels

Draper: The problem of picking ranked games is that you have to pick ranked games between two mirages.  The powerhouse Noles took down the plucky Tarheels in Tally last week proving that the #5 ranking was a joke (easy to see by anyone watching football).  The Wolfpack are....a team that plays football, I guess? I know nothing about them.  While UNC isn't super special, they are a decent 15-25 ranked team that should be able to take down the cross state rival.  NCSt: 20 -- UNC: 31
Hoying: One of the unfortunate effects of the Big Ten and Pac-12 delaying their starts is some poll voters are only listing teams on their ballots that have actually played football already. This leads to unfortunate circumstances like UNC - NC State being a ranked matchup. This...rivalry...I guess? (it doesn't have a name despite these teams being in the same conference and same state and having almost the same name) hasn't had much of an impact on anything ever and that isn't fixing to change this year. NC State has been good enough in recent memory to validate analysts' constant propping them up as a dark horse contender the ACC Atlantic division, but it's still Clemson's world out there east of the Alabama-Georgia border (sigh). As for this one, Wolfpack QB Devin Leary is out for the foreseeable future, and while UNC is nowhere near top 5 caliber (my reaction to them being ranked ahead of Ohio State last week), their offense is good enough to dispatch NC State and stay in the ACC title game hunt (not the ACC title hunt though). NCSU: 27--UNC: 30 
Schweinfurth: I still don't understand how UNC was ranked as a top 5 team (there was a lot of ranking inflation without the B1G and Pac12). They are a good team that won't put a scare into Clemson, but should be good enough the beat the Wolfpack. Yea, they had issues last week, but the 'Heels should be good enough to pull this one out. NCSU: 31--UNC: 35

Cincinnati Bearcats @ Southern Methodist Mustangs

Draper: Are we....Are we really doing this? Two group of five teams that no one cares about? Ok, Ok, Cincy might have stirred the pot a bit in a non-COVID year, but no one seriously expected a playoff push.  Luke Fickell has put together a nice culture in the Lard of Chili and seems to have kept the ball rolling.  The Bearcats are arguably the best Group of Five team out there so I can see them going undefeated and completely ignored come playoff time (likely as they should be).  Unfortunately, there is really nothing they can do with their schedule that will rock the boat.  Regardless, I think they handle the Mustangs so long as there aren't more COVID scares.  UC: 34 -- SMU: 17
Hoying: What do these teams have in common? After the postponement of SMU's game against TCU, it's likely that neither one of these teams will play a Power 5 school this fall. In other words, it doesn't matter at all that these teams are undefeated and ranked in the top 16; they aren't sniffing the Playoff unless every SEC team except Alabama is 5-5. But it's still fun to watch SMU try to score lots of points and Luke Fickell's Bearcats try to stop them. Look, UC QB Desmond Ridder isn't going to light the world on fire. But the 'Cats picked off 5 passes last time they saw the field and held Army to 182 rushing yards the week before. The Ponies will be penned up in this one. UC: 31--SMU: 24
Schweinfurth: Cincinnati is the better team here. SMU can move the ball, but this is a Luke Fickell team. They will play good defense and all they need to do is slow the Mustangs down. UC: 28--SMU:20

Nebraska Cornhuskers @ THE Ohio State University Buckeyes
Draper: Welcome home, boys.  I'm so excited we get the privilege of seeing this Buckeye team again.  While last year was heart-breaking, I don't expect to see a team with a bigger chip on their shoulder/statement to make than the 2020 Buckeyes.  This may lead to some sloppy play at the beginning which might scare a few Buckeye faithful, but when this machine gets rolling, get out of the way.  Fields, Olave, Wilson, and Teague are going to feast on a Nebraska team who is going to regret pushing for a season.  Defensively, the real focus should be on the impact of Kerry Combs return to the sideline.  Along with Shaun Wade's surprising return, Coach Coombs was a HUGE get by Day and Co. (and maybe for the receiving corps). Expect the Bucks to make a statement to the Clemson's and Bama's of the college football landscape: We're back, we're hungry, and we're coming for you.  (On a related note: OSU Hype Video Team>>>>>>>>>) Neb: 20 -- OSU: 62
Hoying: I'm sure that you, like me, are still not over it. We (most of us) believed that the Buckeyes had what it takes to defeat Clemson. We found that it was we who were mistaken...about a great many things. Everything that transpired did so according to Dabo's design. An entire legion of his best players awaited us. Only now, at the end of the longest offseason in history, do we understand. But Scott Frost and Ryan Day are here to put us back on schedule, and after 10 months of stewing in the "what could have been" for perhaps the most complete Ohio State team of all time, the returning players' hate has made them powerful. You want this matchup, don't you? The hate is swelling in you now. Nebraska is unarmed. Strike them down, and our journey toward a redemptive national championship will be...well commenced. It is unavoidable. It is our destiny. It may be that our overconfidence is our weakness, since we've lost our three starting WRs, a 2000 yard stud in JK Dobbins, and consensus All Americans both in the defensive backfield and more often than not in opponents' offensive backfields, not to mention pretty much all of the rest of the DBs and D-Line. But the Silver Bullets' deflector shield will be quite operational when the Cornhuskers arrive. Adrian Martinez's feeble skills are no match for the power of Kerry Coombs. Now witness the power of this fully armed and operational juggernaut offense! Neb: 17--OSU: 52
Schweinfurth: This is a mismatch all over the place. Yes, both teams led the charge to get B1G football back, but the Buckeyes are the team with the most to play for. Talent does not equate here. I'm excited for Ohio State football. The kids are excited for Ohio State football (they've only been asking for the last two months). Let's get this kicked off. Neb: 13--OSU: 62

Upset Special
Draper: Indiana over Penn State
Hoying: Pittsburgh over Notre Dame
Schweinfurth: Illinois over Wisconsin

Counting Our Playoff Chickens

Now that the fifth column power conference, the Pac-12, has limped back into the 2020 fold as well, it's time to create our dream playoff scenarios. Honestly, you can't create a better field than last year's, with Ohio State lined up to play their greatest modern foe, Clemson, and then their turncoat quarterback Joe Burreaux, in back-to-back games. What can we cook up this year?

Scenario 1: Restoring the schedule.

After playing some lackluster out-of-conference opponents over the last two seasons, the Buckeyes finally had a hotly anticipated trip to the Autzen Zoo to play the Oregon Ducks this season. And while September has come and gone with no feathered trophy to show for it, we could see a restoration of the game in Pasadena on New Year's Day if we're lucky (no chance of facing Oregon in the championship). Then the Buckeyes can play Alabama or whomever for the title. This would be nice, but Oregon's not so much an intriguing opponent as a brightly colored bug that it's fun to squish every decade or so. No team has lost to Ohio State as many times (nine times) without a win as the Ducks. 

Scenario 2: S-E-C! S-E-C!

You've seen how the Big 12 is doing so far. Poorly. One of the disadvantages of being one of the few conferences to keep any nonconference games is that when you lose to the cupcake teams it really makes your teams' SOS look bad. The nonconference part of the schedule has likely come to an abrupt end with Baylor's game against Houston being postponed, and the Big 12 went 5-3 as a conference, including a borderline unforgivable 0-3 against the Sun Belt. And one of those three losses was dealt to Kansas State, the team that just knocked off Oklahoma. There are now three undefeated Big 12 teams: Oklahoma State, Baylor, and Texas. Anyone want to buy in to one of these contenders?

We've already discussed the Pac-12. They have zero room for error and don't really have a standout team except for Oregon or maybe USC (has to be their year sometime, right)?

The ACC is not getting 2 teams in, and the Big Ten probably isn't either.

That leaves...*ethereal cry of PAWWWWWWLLLLLLL resonates from the walls*.

Yes, despite the fact that Ohio State has won its last two big-time matchups against SEC teams, there remains a pernicious myth that the Southeastern Conference remains the Buckeyes' kryptonite. What better way to put the haters and losers in their place then by dispatching the SEC runner-up in Pasadena and the big kahuna in Miami? Triple bonus points if they're LSU and Florida.

Scenario 3: REVENGE!

No Buckeye losses in the last 20 years have stung as much as the beating Florida put on the 2006 team and the heartbreaker Clemson unleashed last December. Especially galling is that Ohio State has faced both of those teams multiple times this century but has never beaten either of them. What better sendoff for the 2020 season than for Ohio State to get sweet justice for two stolen national championships?

Or, if you prefer, since this season is shaping up to be even wackier than the nutty 2007 campaign, swap in LSU so the Buckeyes can right that wrong. (Spoiler alert: LSU is not going to the Playoff no matter how many times I say it how badly I would love Ohio State to wipe the floor with them.)

Scenario 4: In-Season Rematch

This one you can file under dream scenarios => nightmare. 9-0 Ohio State dispatches 8-1 Michigan (or Penn State or Wisconsin or whatever) and there aren't 3 other teams strong enough to nab playoff spots. Welcome to rematch city, which could even take place in the championship if the Buckeyes end up at #2 or #3. Grosssss.

2020 Schedule, Take Three

Thanks to the shortened season, the Buckeyes no longer have time to open the season against Bowling Green or close with Iowa (eww), as two separate previous schedules would have prescribed. Each team will still play 9 conference games, but the division champs won't get a 10th as per the recent status quo. Here are some thoughts on the revised schedule.

No Days Off

Due to the Big Ten's hemming and hawing over the better part of the month, the 2020 season will be packed into a very short timeframe spanning less than 2 months. Accordingly, every week is needed, with no room for byes or off weeks. This is not unheard of; bye weeks only became a regular staple of Ohio State seasons during the Cooper years, and the Buckeyes played entire full 12-game schedules in 2006, 2007, and 2009 with no bye weeks either. But it does mean there is no room for error. The Houston Cougars have seen their first 4 games of the 2020 season postponed or cancelled through no fault of their own: all 4 opponents have been sidelined by the virus. The Buckeyes can ill afford any many cancellations if they want to preserve their playoff resume, especially considering that...

The Schedule Kind of Sucks

There's no denying that Ohio State plays the easiest schedule in the Big Ten every year, by virtue of being the only team guaranteed not to play Ohio State. But this year's schedule is particularly...lacking. Half of this is a function of playing in the B1G East. You're going to see Indiana, Maryland, and Rutgers year in and year out (thanks, Jim Delany). Michigan State doesn't look to be particularly threatening this year, either. But the Buckeyes' scheduled crossover opponents are no prize themselves. On on the one hand, you have the Buckeyes' most historic rival, the Fighting Illini, who other than snakebiting the Badgers last year did a whole lot of nothing in the 2010s. Then there's Nebraska, who we'll charitably say is having a bit of a rough go adjusting to the Scott Frost era. Their most dangerous player, JD Spielman, has left town, and they're not going to have any time to find their footing before opening their season in Columbus (at least the crowd noise won't be a factor). But enjoy that opener, Buckeye Nation, and the subsequent trip to Penn State on Halloween. This may be the worst November in Ohio State football history,* "featuring" Rutgers, Maryland, Indiana, and Illinois. At least there's a wooden turtle at the end of the tunnel. If the Buckeyes don't have any glitzy wins against Penn State or Michigan, or worse, the B1G championship falls by the wayside, you're going to hear a lot of grumbling about cupcake schedules. It won't matter much as long as the Buckeyes win out; nobody's going to mistake Ohio State for UCF, and even a 5-0 or 6-0 record should be enough to silence the doubters if the team looks good doing it.

*Special mention to November 1967, which featured games against 3-7 Michigan State, 0-9-1 Wisconsin, 1-8-1 Iowa, and 4-6 Michigan.

The Game Back Where It Belongs (kind of)

When the Big Ten messed around with the schedule the first time, creating the 10 game conference-only monster (hi, SEC), they made the peculiar decision to sprinkle the rivalry games throughout the season, rather than the last week (except, oddly, IU-PU). Most notably, The Game was moved to October 24, the seventh game of the season. This would have left a bad taste in everyone's mouth, as nobody wants to play The Game and then go back to business as usual the next week (one of the reasons I'm not in love with the Big Ten Championship Game). But at least it left some opportunities for rescheduling if something went wrong, as Schedule 2.0 included two open dates after the scheduled showdown. Now that the schedule has no room for error at all, The Game has been restored to its rightful place right at the end of the season, though on December 12 rather than Thanksgiving weekend (of course, I liked it better when it was before Thanksgiving weekend for a slew of reasons, but I'll try to keep my old man sentiments to a minimum). 

One word of caution: before any of this madness hit the world, someone I know scheduled their wedding for the first open Saturday after the Buckeye football season ended. That's right, December 12. Single folks, remember: nothing beats a late spring / early summer wedding.

Back in Scarlet

After the Big Ten's announcement that real fall football is returning, I'm the most optimistic (read as: at all optimistic for the first time) for the prospect of 2020 Ohio State football since the day the Big Ten Tournament was abruptly aborted. I need to share my thoughts on this now because if the season is cancelled again I'll be too depressed to write a word or watch a single down of football for another year.

Tempering Expectations

I'm not talking about expectations for how many games are going to be played vs. cancelled. If there's an outbreak among the players and a few Saturdays fall by the wayside I'll raise my fist against the sky in lamentation of another joy that 2020 has taken from us. No, I'm talking about the reason that so many of us in Buckeye Nation were desperate for this season to happen (other than every Buckeye season is our year-defining series of events): the Buckeyes are deep in the hunt for their 9th national championship.

Remember the Fiesta Bowl? It seems like a million years ago at this point but last December what was quite possibly the greatest team in Ohio State history blew their chance at immortality against their hated nemesis Clemson. Yes, I've only been watching Buckeye football closely since about 2000 or so but last year's team was far and away the best unit I've ever seen and I don't think any of the historical units (1968? 1973? 1996? 1998?) is in the conversation either. After the game finished I went home and wrote my introduction to the 2020 Ohio State season opener game just raving about how ticked off this team is going to be and the pounding they were going to put on Bowling Green. That writeup aged like Walter Donovan but the core sentiment remains: this team is going to be hungry for another chance, and they're returning enough pieces (OL, WR, DL, TE, LB, P, K, and oh yeah, QB) to make it happen.

All last fall we had to hear the national pundits talk about what could've been for Ohio State had they not let Joe Burrow get away. Was it the right call to let him go in 2018 and focus on Haskins? Almost certainly yes: he had a rocky go in his first season at LSU while Dwayne was single-handedly dragging Ohio State to a Big Ten title and a Rose Bowl championship. But a favorite "what-if" among the Buckeye faithful was: would you rather have had 2 years of Joe Burrow or a year of Dwayne and a year of Fields? After all, Ohio State almost definitely wins the natty with last year's version of Burrow on the team (if for no other reason than that LSU no longer has him). Were two great, nearly phenomenal seasons sufficient compensation? My answer always was: let's wait and see what Fields unleashes in his goodbye tour. If he leads us to the promised land, it was all worth it.

And then we had our hearts ripped out by the cowards at Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Northwestern, Indiana, Purdue, Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland, Michigan State, and Michigan. We were never going to see Justin Fields in an Ohio State uniform again. Now that he's back, joined by the bulk of his old receiver corps and O-line and a shiny new transfer RB, the sky is the limit once again for the Buckeye offense and, so long as the secondary doesn't completely fall to pieces (we see you, Shaun), the team as a whole.

It sucks that we didn't get to see this team hunt the Ducks last week, but a championship would heal all ills from this season.

Of course, all of this is assuming that they're not going to get kneecapped by the Playoff Committee...

The Secret Life of the Committee

The Committee has wisely kept its mouth shut during the turmoil of season postponements and cancellations, other than to release their schedule for ranking releases, which are a bit later than usual. The first rankings, usually out around the start of November, are due out on November 17, well past the B1G's revised start date of October 24. This means the Committee won't have much film of the Buckeyes to look at before they put the number next to the name, but the final rankings aren't due out until the Big Ten season finishes on Championship Saturdelay anyway, so the Bucks will have a full 9-game season to make their impression. The only problem is that the Buckeyes are set up to make a less complete impression than their competitors from the SEC (10 games each), Big 12 (10 games each) or ACC (11 games each). This could work for or against the Bucks: short season means fewer chances for losses, but your win total's not going to be as shiny, and no bye week means you're not getting a break from getting each opponent's best shot week after week. Not to mention that an outbreak, whether at home or affecting some drag-along team like Rutgers or Illinois that's not laser focused on the season, could limit Ohio State's win opportunities even further. 

But despite what the tinfoil hat crowd on Twitter and the Eleven Warriors comment section would have you believe, there's no conspiracy to keep Ohio State out of the Playoff. There is no way that a 9-0 (or even 8-0 with a game cancellation) Buckeye team is going to be ranked anywhere below #3 unless they're showcasing some serious 2002 style points, and even then a fall to #5 is out of the question. Even a one-loss Ohio State team isn't doomed if they can win the conference and pull off good wins against Penn State, Michigan, and/or Wisconsin. Where is the Committee going to find four better teams, particularly now that Notre Dame is playing in a conference and squarely under Clemson's thumb (or vice versa)? One from the SEC, one from the Big 12, one from the ACC, and...what? A second team from the SEC? No chance if the Buckeyes haven't lost. Dixie will scream and holler that they're playing 10 in-conference games in far and away the toughest conference in America (ironically, as a result of imitating the schedule the Big Ten originally pioneered) but there is no chance in hell that an undefeated Ohio State is left out of the playoff with eight or nine wins, a conference championship, and zero losses, no matter how closely the 9-1 SEC runner-up played Bama. A Group of Five team? Not likely with the MAC (lol) and Mountain West not playing (although at the time of writing this, the MWC was trying to reverse course as well), and the nonconference schedules severely curtailed, preempting any signature wins by a team from a lesser conference. Am I forgetting anyone? Oh, yeah...

A Lot to Un-Pac

Anyone notice that throughout the "will they / won't they" soap opera embroiling the Big Ten, nobody cared about whether or not the Pac-12 would come back? OK, not nobody, USC has been lobbying to get the season started up again, but there hasn't exactly been an outcry in Seattle or Eugene or Berkeley (lol) about a lack of football. At least nothing compared to Lincoln or Columbus. Nevertheless, perhaps in response to the Big Ten's earthshaking announcement, governors Gavin Newsom (California) and Kate Brown (Oregon) have loosened their restrictions on college football, clearing the way for a return of Pac-12 football. However, Larry Scott has indicated that he wants at least a 6 week timeframe for a reboot of the football season, and the rumor mill is floating a Halloween start date at the earliest, so their timeline seems to be somewhat slower than the B1G's. Given that the Big Ten schedule grants a maximum of 9 games with no byes, it's hard to see how the Pac-12 will have anything approaching a full season for Committee consideration. Not that they had a serious title contender this year anyway, except maybe (maybe) Oregon or USC. At least they'll have a champion to send to a New Year's Six game, I suppose.

Random Thoughts

• I know it doesn't matter at all, but what is the AP Poll going to do this week? True, the Big Ten won't have played any games until late October, but the AP Poll ranked B1G teams preseason despite the teams having no prospects for playing in 2020. The SEC continues to feature top 25 teams despite not taking the field for another couple of weeks. Either way, this poll is going to be weird to watch: either Ohio State is going to hover around #1-4 for a month and a half despite not playing a single snap, or a bunch of 1-0 B1G teams are going to suddenly pop into the rankings just in time for the start of November.
• With the 8-game conferenceschedule, Ohio will get presumably get 2 cross division opponents before championship & friends weekend. Please please please let them be Iowa and Purdue.
• What the hell is going on in Ann Arbor? Ohio State reacted to the restoration of a meaningful 2020 season by clawing back two 100%-lock early NFL draft picks who had already opted out.  Michigan reacted by shedding their presumed starting QB, Dylan McCaffrey, and their top receiving threat, Nico Collins. Scared of getting 100 hung on them? Jimmy knows tanking doesn't work in college, right?
• And to pile on TTUN even further, a joke shamelessly stolen from Eleven Warriors commenter Barfolomew: with the 8 games + 1 "everybody plays on championship weekend" schedule, Michigan will finally play in a postseason B1G game. Congratulations.

Ghosts of Playoffs Past

31-0.

Chances are that's all you've heard about since, well, forget Selection Sunday, you've heard about this ever since it was obvious that Clemson was going to run the table and one of LSU and Ohio State was going to be stuck facing them out in the desert. And yet Ohio State's performances in these situations shouldn't be judged by their most recent showing, a sample size of just one game; we deserve to take a look at all of these matchups in recent memory. No, no, not Ohio State's rich history against Clemson; I've already covered that in another post. Rather, Ohio State being back in a playoff game for the seventh time this century (if we categorize the BCS national championship as a two-team playoff). I've spend the last couple weeks taking some trips down memory lane to relive each of Ohio State's previous six playoff/BCS appearances (sometimes for the first time since seeing them live) and seeing sticks out and what patterns arise. Yes, college football looks drastically different today than when the Miami Hurricanes were cock of the walk back in 01-02, but there are still lessons to be learned for this Saturday's upcoming matchup.*

*Past performance is not indicative of future results. But let's have some fun anyway!

2003 Fiesta Bowl: #2 Ohio State 31 - #1 Miami 24 (2OT)
Game summary in one sentence: Buckeye defense plays the game of its life and offense avoids game-turning disasters.

Rewatching this game, two things really jump out at me: (1) the Hurricanes were not ready for the multiple looks the Buckeye defense were throwing at them, and (2) Craig Krenzel was an absolute wizard escaping pressure. Krenzel was rolled out on practically every dropback to avoid Miami's pass rush up the middle and was sacked only once all night, though he was knocked down over 20 times. Krenzel finished as the game's leading rusher both by total yards and yards per carry. For everyone who said Ohio State could never win a national title with JT Barrett at QB, they essentially did in 2002 against an offense featuring two Heisman finalists.

And it was because of the defense. Miami's first snap of the game was a sack (the Buckeyes finished with 4 on the night) and the Buckeyes forced 5 turnovers. They had an answer for everything but Miami TE Kellen Winslow, Jr. And for everyone who thought it was fashionable to pick on Dustin Fox, he did a better job covering Roscoe Parrish than Gamble did against Andre Johnson, and Fox forced two turnovers to boot, the second of which should have iced the game late in the fourth quarter.

It's eerie how many of this game's iconic moments were foreshadowed:

• On Roscoe Parrish's first punt return attempt (a fair catch), the announcers warned about how dangerous he was. Parrish was bottled up the entire game on returns until his last chance, late in the 4th, which set up Miami's last second tying FG. Interestingly, Parrish had just fumbled a few plays early after a long reception.
• Chris Gamble (on defense) got called for a super weak holding call in the second quarter, tugging on the back of Andre Johnson's jersey, much less egregious than either (1) the holding call that was missed on Gamble's near-reception late in the 4th quarter, or (2) the famous pass interference call on a pass to Gamble in OT.
• Just before half, Willis McGahee took a quick completion and Will Allen rammed right into his knee. In the second half, just as Miami started to get its run game going, Allen tore off every CL in McGahee's knee on a similar hit.
• Just after half, Cie Grant blitzed Dorsey on 3rd down, forcing a quick throw to McGahee, who stopped just short of the sticks anticipating a hit from Dustin Fox and failed to pick up the first down, forcing a Miami punt. This foreshadows both (1) the hit to McGahee described above, and (2) Grant's iconic game-ending blitz on 4th down in 2OT.
• In the third quarter, facing a 3rd and 6, Krenzel hits Michael Jenkins but Jenkins jumps to catch the ball and his feet come down just out of bounds. This foreshadows both (1) the 3rd down throw to Gamble late in the fourth quarter that was incorrectly ruled out of bounds, and (2) the huge completion to Jenkins near the sideline on 4th and 14 in OT.

Never forget that Lydell Ross had significant carries in a national championship game that Ohio State won, including being part of 3 of OSU's 4 touchdown drives.

2007 BCS National Championship: #2 Florida 41 - #1 Ohio State 14
Game summary in one sentence: Buckeyes make the least of limited opportunities on both sides of the ball.

It was uncanny watching the Florida offense operate in this game; it was like watching 2010's era Ohio State work over 2000's era Ohio State.

If field position doesn't win ball games, it does a lot of the heavy lifting. Florida got the ball in Ohio State territory on 4 of their 7 first half possessions through a combination of dumb personal foul penalties, turnovers, and turnovers on downs, and turned those opportunities into 24 points, i.e., more points than Ohio State scored all game.

Hand in hand with field position is 3rd down conversions. In the first half, Florida was 7 for 10. Ohio State? 1 for 5. The Buckeye D tightened in the second half and held UF to 3 of 9 but the irreparable damage was done by that point.

Running the ball with Antonio Pittman was working all game except when it was most desperately needed, on a 4th and 1 from the Buckeye 29 after the Buckeyes clawed back to down 7.

You wouldn't notice it unless you watched this game right after the Miami championship, but somehow Craig Krenzel is a more slippery runner than Troy Smith. I can't count the number of times Troy ran directly into the Florida pass rush.

2008 BCS National Championship: #2 LSU 38 - #1 Ohio State 24
Game summary in one sentence: Buckeye miscues tip competitive game in favor of opponent.

Watching this game hurt the most because it was the only one of the losses the Buckeyes could've realistically won. The Buckeyes jumped all over LSU early and had a 10 point lead, and it wasn't because of fluky plays.

2007 had maybe the second best collection of LBs in Buckeye history (after Hawk, Carpenter, and Schlegel in 2005), but James Laurinaitis and Marcus Freeman had a quiet game compared to the third amigo, Larry Grant. Laurinaitis had 18 tackles and Freeman had 14 but neither had many impact plays.

On the other side of the ball, Brian Hartline was the only receiver doing any work. Boeckman just should have looked his way on every pass play.

Up 10-3, Ohio State punts and LSU fumbles inside the 20, then falls on the ball. The next two drives were an LSU TD and an OSU blocked field goal. What could've been...

Speaking of what could've been, if I had to pick the most important play of all 6 of these games, it would be the roughing the punter on LSU's opening drive of the second half. Down 24-10, Ohio State forced LSU into a 4th and 23 and had a chance to retake all of the momentum, and Austin Spitler dove for the punter's foot instead of diving in front of his foot to block the punt. Instead of getting the ball in LSU territory, LSU kept the ball at Ohio State's 45.

Capping that same drive, Matt Flynn found Early Doucet at the 5 yard line and broke 3 tackles on his way into the endzone for LSU's fourth straight TD drive in a row (other than an end of half kneelout). Shockingly, the defense actually finally showed up after that embarrassment, but again, the damage was done.

And a lot of the damage was done on, you guessed it, third down. First half third down conversions: LSU 8 for 10, OSU 2 for 7. The defense settled down at halftime (LSU went 3 for 7 in the second half) but the offense didn't (1 for 6 in the second half).

2015 Sugar Bowl: #4 Ohio State 42 - #1 Alabama 35
Game summary: Buckeyes make lion's share of mistakes but not enough to waste clear advantage on both sides of the ball.

If Craig Krenzel was slippery, Cardale Jones was a dump truck running against this Bama D. Linemen, linebackers, safeties, it doesn't matter, Cardale will run you over, and he will seek the contact despite there being nobody left behind him on the depth chart.

Having a run threat weapon like that is how you flip the script on third down. After the Florida and LSU debacles, OSU opens the first half going 7 for 10 on third down (and most of them were 3rd and loooong). Bama went 2 for 13 on third down all game. The Buckeyes cooled off a bit in the second half (3 of 8) but big plays made the difference.

If Ohio State doesn't spew the ball all over the field in the first quarter this game is never close. Zeke started gashing Bama for a 54 yard run on Ohio State's first drive and he never looked back. Go back and watch that 54 yard run; it's even better than the more famous 85 Yards Through the Heart of the South.

The only other negative for the Buckeyes was the play calling in their goal-to-go situations:

• Cardale run for no gain
• Cardale pass incomplete
• Cardale pass incomplete (field goal)
• Cardale sack for loss of 8 yards
• Cardale completion for 5 yards
• Cardale pass incomplete (field goal)
• Cardale run for loss of 1 yard
• Cardale pass incomplete, with DPI
• Cardale pass to Marshall for loss of 1 yard (at this point in the game, Zeke has 111 yards on 10 carries but whatever)
• Zeke run for 3 yards
• Zeke run for 3 yards, FIRST TD OF THE DAY

I lied, one last problem. Late in the game, with a 2 TD lead, Ohio State seemed determined to let Bama back in the game. First, Tyvis Powell and Doran Grant both decide to bite on a double move and allow a 50 yard bomb over their heads. Then, the Bucks try for a home run ball instead of eating clock and feeding Zeke. Thankfully, Bama's clock management skills on their last drive are terrible and their Hail Mary is devoured by Tyvis Powell.

One of the most fun things about rewatching these games is the "hey, it's that guy!" moments where forgotten players get a chance to shine. The most "hey, it's that guy!" guy from this game is WR Corey Smith, who blew up multiple Alabama kickoff returns inside the 20 (Urban's coffin corner kickoff strategy was masterfully realized in this game) and had some nice blocks to go along with a catch.

2015 College Football Playoff National Championship: #4 Ohio State 42 - #2 Oregon 20
Game summary: Buckeyes' multiple mistakes barely slow down a complete domination.
I still can't believe Oregon was a 7 point favorite in this game. Did the oddsmakers even watch the Sugar Bowl? At any rate, it looked like they would be vindicated early. Oregon score, Buckeye punt, and Oregon is only stopped by a drop on 3rd down on their next drive.

Zeke was great against Wisconsin and Alabama, but he was virtually unstoppable in this game, as was Cardale on the scramble. After their first drive, the Buckeyes did not punt again until halfway through the fourth quarter (except for a punt right before half as OSU tried to run out the clock and failed). There are four turnovers sprinkled in that mix, but all were on drives on which the offense was moving the ball. The all-important third down? Ohio State converted 5 for 8 in the first half (plus a fourth down conversion), compared to Oregon's 2 for 8.

I love JK Dobbins, and I think he's going to have a big game against Clemson, but give me Zeke any day of the week for his speed advantage and outstanding blocking prowess.

Oregon made a few mistakes as well (mostly drops on wide open deep balls) overall the Buckeye D was pretty solid all day. WR Byron Marshall and RB Travis Tyner (not Royce Freeman for some reason) were the only Ducks to find any room to work.

2016 Fiesta Bowl: #2 Clemson 31 - #3 Ohio State 0
Game summary in one sentence: Unimaginative offensive game plan squanders good defensive effort.

This was the only loss in the bunch that was not a total team failure by the Buckeyes. The defense actually played pretty well, notwithstanding the 31 points. Both second half touchdowns were on short fields, and the defense scored two interceptions early in the game, one to set up the offense with a scoring opportunity (missed field goal #1) and one to end a Clemson scoring threat.

Oh, and Cameron Johnston was unimpeachable: 7 punts averaging 49.7 yards, with a long of 61 and 3 down inside the 20.

The offense didn't just suffer from a lack of preparation; the in-game decision making was maddening as well. On Ohio State's first drive into Clemson territory, Michael Jordan went down to an injury and was replaced by Demetrious Knox at LG. On third and 1, the Buckeyes run JT TO THE LEFT and Knox misses the snap count, standing there like a statue while the DL devours JT. Tyler Durbin, who at this point is a total head case after missing two easy FGs against Michigan, then blows a scoring chance.

The receiving corps was a hellscape this year. After the departure of Devin Smith and Michael Thomas, the only upperclassman of note was Corey Smith, and the only other options were the young guns Noah Brown, Binjamin Victor, K.J. Hill, Terry McLaurin, and Parris Campbell (who was involved kickoffs only), who at this point, we know, were not getting any meaningful guidance from their position coach. All day it seemed like the only guy JT even looked at was Curtis Samuel, who was had 9 catches on 11 targets. OSU's other receivers? 7 catches on 22 targets.

Not that the coaches trusted the receivers or JT anyway. I don't think I saw a deep route until the game was practically out of hand and the Buckeyes just said "screw it" and started chucking it on every play (which, incidentally, gave them their best drive of the game).

Also, for a team that supposedly couldn't throw down field, Ohio State showed zero commitment to the run game. Mike Weber didn't get a single carry until halfway through the second quarter and didn't get a second until the second half. Of course, he did fumble on his second and third carries, so maybe the coaching staff knew something we didn't...

Once more, the third downs tell the story. Clemson went 8 for 17 (not a bad performance by the defense) and Ohio State went 3 for 14, including an abysmal 2 for 9 in the first half.

New Year's Six - Tiger Slam

Final Regular Season Standings:
1. Hoying 44-11 (4-10 upset)
1. Schweinfurth 44-11 (2-12 upset)
1. Seeberg 44-11 (1-13 upset)
4. Draper 39-16 (2-12 upset)

The #1 seed may have eluded our beloved Buckeyes but we're back in the Playoff again to face a familiar foe, the Tigers. Just like Oklahoma. And Penn State (except for the playoff part, great but not elite). Thankfully, none of these games is on a weekday New Year's Eve (although the Orange Bowl is strangely on a Monday night). For the Bucks, it's just another college football Saturday before a championship Monday night. Beat Clemson.

SATURDAY, DECEMBER 28

Cotton Bowl: Memphis Tigers vs. Penn State Nittany Lions
Draper: Oh joy....will the Lions be able to get interested in the Little Sister's of the Poor Bowl? Memphis is a fine team, but the athletes don't match up.  Add on top of that the fact that Mike Norvell is in Tallahassee equals trouble for the Tigers.  Regardless, Memphis is a decent team to beat UC twice, but Penn State is a different monster.  If Penn State doesn't take umbrage at the matchup vs. the Group of 5 representative, Sean Clifford and Co. should take care of business.  Look for the Tigers to come out swinging but falter in the 2nd half.  Mem: 17 -- PSU: 31
Hoying: Welcome to this year's token little brother bowl. The group of Group of 5 teams vying for this slot was a bit thicker than usual, but that was mostly because none of the contenders really set itself apart. Memphis got the nod thanks to the AAC being a bit deeper than the other Group of 5 conferences (maybe even the ACC) but have they really been so great? Beating bad Ole Miss by 5 is nice, but Penn State has been getting real live wins over real live teams not named Ohio State or...Minnesota. Expect this on to be close, as Penn State hasn't put away a quality opponent all year, but the Lions' stifling D is too much for Memphis to handle, especially with their coach already out the door. Mem: 24--PSU: 30
Schweinfurth: As much as I railed on and made fun of Penn State this year, they are the better team here. Not only that, they were passed over for the Rose Bowl. Penn State should win, unless they are caught sulking. Mem: 13–PSU: 31
Seeberg: Rough situation for Penn State here, really a no-win scenario (not near as ugly TTUN/Bama, however.  I really wish neither team could win).  Win even in decent fashion and it still looks iffy for the program to not be able to dominate a group of 5 champion.  And in all honesty, that's probably what will happen.  In theory, the Nittanys should be able to lean on a reasonably talented but far less deep team than themselves and the talent gap should be evident over four quarters.  Here's hoping that theory comes to fruition.  Mem: 24--PSU: 35

MONDAY, DECEMBER 30

Orange Bowl: Virginia Cavaliers vs. Florida Gators
Draper: This is the one.  On paper, this shouldn't be close.  The Gators defense has been phenomenal all year and the Hoos are coming off a beatdown to Clemson in the ACC championship, but every year, there's one weird result.  I'm throwing my chips in the upset bucket here.  Florida is a mediocre offensive unit and a power pass rushing team,  Bryce Perkins is going to be able to both run and pass in a surprise showing.  The Gators have nothing to play for, but the Cavaliers see this as the Superbowl.  The Wahoos shock the Gators in Miami (let's not forget this Florida team almost lost in Miami in Week 0...and the Hurricanes are the 2nd best team in the...city. UVA: 24 -- UF: 20
Hoying: Nobody wants to be the bowl stuck with the interloping Group of 5 team, but this year's Orange Bowl may have gotten the shorter end of the stick. You know it's bad when a New Year's Six game has the largest spread (Florida -14.5) in all of bowl season. Although the Peach Bowl's not much better. What's there to say about Virginia? They finally got the Hokie off their back after 15 years, but there's not really another good win on the schedule (because they aren't available in the ACC) and the less said about the Clemson game, the better. UF played a murderer's row including TWO FCS teams and lackluster out of conference matchups against flagging FSU and Miami teams (still better than most of the scheduling in the SEC), picking up a nice win against Auburn and little else. The Gator D has hung tough all year, only faltering against Juggernaut Joe and LSU, and they'll be more than up to the challenge of handling Virginia's pass-only offense. UVA: 13--UF: 27
Schweinfurth: Virginia was the ACC sacrifice to Clemson and felt like they were a bit lucky to be there. Florida has played a much tougher schedule and seemed to be coming on late in the year. Gators win. UVA: 10–UF: 17
Seeberg:  OK, I get all the bowl tie-ins to conferences I really do, but letting any ACC team not named Clemson anywhere near a bowl game of consequence is an outright farce.  It will be ugly to watch but the SEC gets the...bragging rights (?) of beating a 4-loss ACC squad that mustered just 9 points in a loss against Miami (you know, the team that just got shut out by Louisiana Tech).  Bleh.  Onto the next one.  UVA: 10--UF: 31

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 1

Rose Bowl: Wisconsin Badgers vs. Oregon Ducks
Draper: This might be the best matchup outside of the playoff.  Oregon has been playing very well outside of gagging in Tempe while the Badgers are a Lovie Smith miracle from beating undefeated (outside of OSU).  While the Badgers didn't last in Indy, they played much better than I think even they expected.  Jack Coan looked pretty good while Taylor finally had a non-stinker against the Bucks.  Oregon has a defense this year (huh?) but they are led by Justin Herbert who is seen as a top pick in the 2020 NFL Draft (pleeeeease not Cincy).  The Wisconsin defense should drive Herbert's stock down.  I like the Badgers to nip the Ducks in a fairly low scoring contest.  UW: 20 -- Ore: 17
Hoying: The last time these two met in the Rose Bowl it was the Ducks who emerged victorious in a wild shootout that featured Wisconsin spiking the ball on Oregon's 25 down seven with no time left. This year's version of the Ducks gets it done with defense, led by their top 10 ranked rush D. Problem is, Wisconsin's rush defense is even better, and that's after playing JK Dobbins twice. No problem, you may say, Oregon can rely on the big arm of future Bengals #1 overall pick Justin Herbert. Yes problem, because the Wisconsin pass D is stellar as well, and I'm sure you all vividly remember the pressure the Badger pass rush generated against Justin Fields in October and December. Oregon hasn't seen the likes of Jonathan Taylor anywhere in the Pac-12, and now that he's got his mojo working after finally finding some room against the Buckeyes, I expect the Badger momentum to continue into New Year's Day and get the Big Ten its 4th Rose Bowl win this century. UW: 27--Ore: 20
Schweinfurth: Wisconsin is a sneaky good team. The defense is legit...if Chris Orr is healthy.Justin Herbert is good, but the Badgers are very good rushing the passer. The fewer possessions in this game, the better chance the Badgers have to win. Jonathan Taylor goes for 200 and the Badgers win. UW: 28–Ore: 13
Seeberg: Oregon finally looked as good as we THOUGHT they were in not letting Utah off the hook, thrashing them in the PAC-12 title game to the misery of its leaders, further relegating the conference to obscurity.  Meanwhile, Wisconsin looked all-world for a half against the Buckeyes before things ultimately righted themselves.  Make no mistake, however, both teams are good, but Oregon has exactly 0 answer for Jonathan Taylor, and that's a problem, because when Wisconsin has an elite back, it can make their how-did-this-guy-manage-to-get-a-Division-I-scholarship litany of quarterbacks look so good that some metrics actually have them ahead of Buckeye QBs (no seriously, Hornibrook was rated higher than Haskins last year by a couple measures- it's absurd).  Taylor runs wild, the D clamps down, the B1G gets coveted back-to-back Rose Bowl wins.  UW: 31--Ore: 16

Sugar Bowl: Baylor Bears vs. Georgia Bulldogs
Draper: Does Georgia care? I have no idea, but I'd lean, no.  Regardless, can Baylor keep the points flowing against an extremely stingy Dawg D (except against LSU).  Georgia has little to no offense as it is, but the defense has been enough in every game but 2 this year.  Baylor has been fine nearly winning the Big 12 but continuing to come up short against the Big Bad Sooners.  Unfortunately for those that hate the conference that must not be named, if Georgia cares, they should win easily, and if they don't care....I have no idea.  I think the smock falls short in the Bayou.  Baylor: 13--UGA: 17
Hoying: Let's gaze into our magic crystal snowball and see whether Georgia thinks it can win this game or would prefer to phone it in and then blow off the loss as a lack of motivation. 2019 Baylor isn't quite 2018 Texas: the Longhorns blew a huge lead against OU but came up for a last gasp FG to finish the upset, where as Baylor went to pieces against the Sooners when it mattered and narrowly missed out on being LSU's sacrificial lamb in the Peach Bowl. The Bears blew through their first and second string QB on their way to just missing the playoff (Cardale's legacy is secure) and their status for game day is not clear. On the other sideline, Georgia's already anemic offense is still depleted at wide receiver, and you saw what they did against a good-not-great LSU defense with the pieces they currently have in place. I'm tempted to pick Baylor based on what they did in the first half against OU the first time and their hilarious comeback win over TCU, but Georgia is still much more talented top to bottom, and their defense is angry after being shredded in their home state by Burrow & Co. Baylor: 20--UGA: 23
Schweinfurth: Can Georgia score more than 21 points? That will determine how this goes. The Bulldog offense has been bad and Baylor’s D has been good (for a BIG-12 team). To be honest, Ikm not sold on Georgia. Baylor wins late. Baylor: 24–UGA: 21
Seeberg:  Don't expect a lot of points in this one kiddos.  Injuries to both squads coupled with less-than-explosive offenses to begin with resulted in both losing title games and shots at the CFP, albeit one team (cough Bulldogs cough) in far more spectacularly awful fashion than the other.  The proverbial $64,000 question is as follows:  Does Georgia care?  Or will they lay an ostrich-sized egg that is somehow swept under the rug by the mainstream ESPN-led media?  Honestly I don't know.  Georgia is clearly more talented, Baylor likely more motivated (and possibly better coached as well).  I truly think it's first to 20 will win...and Baylor may just get there late.  In the immortal words of Stephen Colbert, what's the biggest threat to America? (Georgia, at least).  BEARS.  Baylor: 20--UGA: 13

SATURDAY, DECEMBER 28 again

Peach Bowl: Oklahoma Sooners vs. Louisiana State Tigers
Draper: This playoff features 2 games in which everyone is picking the same teams.  No one....NO ONE is giving the Sooners a shot in this game.  I think the Heisman tour and the constant barrage of the one seed being perceived as a bye will lull the Tigahs into a false sense of security.  Oklahoma, while not on the level of the top 3 teams, is still very good.  I expect this to be much tighter than the experts, but LSU is good enough to come back when in a hole.  Coach O and company escape with a nailbiter to return to New Orleans for the title.  OU: 38--LSU: 41
Hoying: This year's playoff field may be the deepest in the six years of the tournament. Oklahoma, however, is no part of that calculus. Oh sure, they're more appealing than 2017 Alabama (entering the playoff at least) and maybe even their 2015 and 2018 counterparts, but this year's postseason is all about the undefeated blue bloods in the Fiesta Bowl and the Tide-vanquishing unstoppable LSU Tigers. Nobody is giving the Sooners much of a shot in this game, and it doesn't help when you lose your best pass rusher and your change of pace running back to suspension, and then your star safety gets all busted up in practice (not a game). I still don't fully trust LSU and Coach O, and I think the winner of this game loses in New Orleans regardless of how each semifinal plays out, but this seems like an obvious LSU win. So I'm picking LSU, obviously. OU: 27--LSU: 44
Schweinfurth: LSU is clearly the better team. An already overmatched Oklahoma team now has to deal with a few suspensions. The Sooners best chance is to make this a shootout and hope to have the ball last. Unfortunately, LSU should be able to get a few stops. OU: 35–LSU: 42
Seeberg: Ah we jump from what will likely be brutal to watch to what should be a helluva lot of fun.  This really shouldn't be a blowout despite the -13.5 betting line in LSU's favor.  The Tiger D has shown signs of improvement in recent weeks, but that may be due to playing lackluster offenses, which is certainly not what they'll see here.  Still, it's tough to imagine any Big 12 D holding the LSU juggernaut down, so unless the Heisman curse (see:  Troy Smith, 2006) bites again, LSU rolls into Nola to try to grab a natty.  OU: 34--LSU: 45

Fiesta Bowl: Clemson Tigers vs. THE Ohio State University Buckeyes
Draper: Another game in which NO ONE is picking the Buckeyes (this isn't bulletin board material...I haven't found anyone outside of Columbus picking OSU).  Clemson is a stellar team, but so is this OSU team.  Most of the talking heads have touted the great (#2 in the nation!) average margin of victory for the Tigers (+35.2) which is the excuse for why Clemson's schedule doesn't matter... One problem with this argument...The Bucks are #1 at +36.2 against a MUCH better schedule.  Honestly, this game is a pure toss-up.  Both teams are extremely talented and fairly similar (stud QB, great skill players, stout defense, etc.).  Can Clemson continue their dominance against a real team? Can the Bucks defeat a team that has been a thorn in their side...forever? Let's hope Fields' knee holds up and Chase continues wrecking up the place.  The playoff revenge tour starts here.  OSU: 35--Clem: 31
Hoying: Clemson sure has looked good this year, haven't they? There was the puzzling sputtering offensive performance against North Carolina (that would have knocked Clemson to, what, the #4 seed had they lost?) but the Tigers have otherwise been basically flawless. They have playoff experience (talking point alert). But big whoop, the Buckeyes have been to a NY6 or BCS bowl every year for the last 7 seasons, and after weathering the Rose Bowl last year I don't think they're going to get caught in the big lights of the big game. The Buckeyes have showed even fewer vulnerabilities than the Tigers, and, to steal the other talking point going into this game, they are battle tested, carving a path of destruction against some of the top defenses and most complete teams in the country. Yes, we know that Clemson has been doing what they can against the terrible competition they've been dealt. Yes, we know the advanced stats put them nearly on par with Ohio State. But the advanced stats loved Utah. Then they folded like a house of cards against the attack of the Ducks. The advanced stats really loved Alabama. Then the Tide played the only two decent teams on their schedule and fell flat against both. Don't let the "eye test" fool you: whom have you played and whom have you beaten? On Sunday morning, after a steady dose of JK Dobbins, who has yet to be stopped in any meaningful way this season, and a few Clemson miscues in the passing game, the Buckeyes will be able to wake up and answer that question for the first time in program history with "the Clemson Tigers". Go Bucks. Beat Clemson. Clem: 28--OSU: 38
Schweinfurth: This is the first time this year I am not absolutely confident that Ohio State will win. Clemson has talent all over the field and Travis Entienne is a beast. Add in all world QB Trevor Lawrence and Clemson has the best offense Ohio State has played all year. Fortunately, Clemson hasn’t played a team anywhere near the talent of Ohio State. Clemson played one ranked team (UVA) and they were barely ranked. The Bucks have a great shot if Dobbins and the Buckeye offensive line control the Clemson front. I think they can. Lawrence has a tendency to throw the ball in dangerous places so Okudah and company needs to get their hands on passes when the time arises. This feels like the 2015 Sugar Bowl. The outcome should be the same. Clem: 35–OSU:42
Seeberg:  Apologies in advance, Buckeye Nation, I have a bad feeling about this one.  Six weeks ago I was ready to anoint this 2019 Ohio State iteration the champions of all creation...but that was six weeks ago.  Now in late December, chinks have shown in the armor.  An injury here, a loss of stud rusher Jonathan Cooper there.  A slow start (twice), a defense that was pasted for over 140 rushing yards in a half a week after giving up 250 (!) passing yards in a half.  Were those issues ultimately fixed?  Mostly.  Did the Bucks win those games going away?  You bet.  Were either of those teams in the same stratosphere as Ohio State or, more importantly, the current opponent?  Not even close.  Despite all the recent relative struggles, I was still picking the Bucks to win this one until video surfaced a couple days ago of a supposedly "80 to 85 percent" Justin Fields noticeably limping in practice.  That was the last straw.  I suspect he will still be mobile enough to escape the pocket at times (though he tends to hold the ball too long too often anyhow), but his run threat is compromised, which makes keying to stop Dobbins actually feasible for the first time all season.  My other concern is legitimately all-world coach Ryan Day.  He admitted he got tight with his play-calling in the PSU game after the miscues made the game close.  This game will be close throughout, will he tighten?  Maybe, maybe not, but we know Dabo and Venables will be composed and adjust reasonably well.  Make no mistake, Ryan Day will have many more opportunities on this stage as the Bucks' head coach, but to be the king you gotta beat the king, and an 80% starting quarterback just isn't gonna do it.  *sigh  Tigers late.  Clem: 31--OSU; 27